Private option, GOP-style. More bureaucracy and confusion | Arkansas Blog

Monday, January 19, 2015

Private option, GOP-style. More bureaucracy and confusion

Posted By on Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:31 AM

click to enlarge GETTING READY: Asa Hutchinson posed for an official portrait last week. This week, he gets down to serious business, such as health care. - GOV. HUTCHINSON TWITTER
  • GETTING READY: Asa Hutchinson posed for an official portrait last week. This week, he gets down to serious business, such as health care.

Gov. Asa Hutchinson
gives his long awaited pronouncement on health care Thursday. If he doesn't recommend continuation of the private option expansion of Medicaid through Obamacare — albeit with a new name and a new conservative spin — he's been the best poker bluffer in the world.

The unified Republican resistance to Obamacare has given way nationally to a parade of Republican governors that Asa Hutchinson seems likely to join. They say they are "reinventing" and "improving" the original model to create something even a Tea Party adherent could love.

David Ramsey has written about this change in tone for The New Republic.  He points out some inconvenient facts about the GOP's Obamacare 2.0. Tennessee, Arkansas, Iowa, Michigan and Pennsylvania are in this movement. Others are in the process of talking to the feds about more rule changes.

That’s good news for those states' poorer residents, who have been left to fend for themselves while state legislatures offer massive resistance to Obamacare. In practice, however, crafting plans that are ostensibly more conservative has tended to add layers of bureaucracy and administrative complexity. The Republicanized versions of Medicaid thus far have ended up more complicated, confusing, and possibly costlier than the program Republicans refused to expand in the first place.

Take, for example, Arkansas—the state that got the ball rolling for red states seeking GOP twists on Medicaid expansion with its privatized version known as the “private option.” Last month the state got approval for a byzantine new program, called Health Independence Accounts, that imposes co-pays on some beneficiaries unless they pay a small monthly fee. Those who have paid their fees are eligible, under certain conditions, for up to $200 to pay for the costs of private health insurance if their income goes up and they transition off of Medicaid. To run the program, the state will pay a third-party administrator about $15 million annually (covered by the feds as part of the cost of expansion).

The private option — though it was far better than the alternative of doing nothing — always had a flaw in its tout as a "market-based" solution. Rather than having a single-payer, efficient, lower-overhead government insurance program like conventional Medicare, the Arkansas plan dictated that private insurance companies get a profit cut. That means a greater overall cost. 

The "transformational nature" of additionally burdening poor people to instruct them on living more virtuously fits the majority mood. Republicans believe people who need assistance are generally unworthy (though many of them shout loud amens every Sunday in churches nominally built on the example of Jesus.) They think the poor are lucky ducks happy to get something for nothing. (Think of the 40 percent of Arkansas working taxpayers who make less than $21,000 a year, but are exempted from Hutchinson's proposed income tax cuts because he thinks they already get enough from government.)

Those lucky ducks may soon be confused lucky ducks. Writes Ramsey:

More complex programs can also be more confusing for beneficiaries. State officials in Arkansas have suggested that the Health Independence Accounts would serve as an educational tool, modeling how to be consumers of private insurance, but it's just as likely that beneficiaries will simply be baffled by the genuinely confusing structure and rules. Trying to latch GOP hobby horses onto Medicaid and low-income beneficiaries can make for an awkward fit—in practice, the HIAs aren’t much like private insurance, aren’t much like Health Savings Accounts, and don’t clearly incentivize the most cost-effective ways of using the health care system. To make matters worse, state Republicans have banned state-appropriated outreach funds to help eligible beneficiaries enroll in the private option and navigate the system

Ramsey quotes David Sanders and many others throwing around that misleading word "reform." A change is not necessarily a reform. Reform means make something better. Making something you've already received harder to hang onto is a reform? I think that's a philosophical, not empirical inquiry.

Tags: , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (7)

Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • A Highway 10 traffic solution recommendation

    The Arkansas Department of Transportation has announced its preferences for interchange and other improvements along the Highway 10 corridor between Pleasant Valley Drive and Pleasant Ridge Road.
    • Sep 22, 2017
  • Radical government: The Obamacare repeal

    Apart from the damage that pending Republican legislation will do to millions of American in terms of lost health insurance, it represents conservatives' long-sought upending of the Medicaid safety net for 74 million poor, disabled and elderly (Medicaid pays for most nursing home costs).
    • Sep 22, 2017
  • Legislators must give testimony in Fayetteville rights case UPDATE

    Interim word from the hearing in Circuit Court in Fayetteville in which the ACLU and others are challenging the constitutionality of the state law that prevents cities from adopting civil rights ordinances to protect gay people.
    • Sep 21, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • More on how highways were used to wipe out "blight" of non-white neighborhoods

    Vox, a news website that concerns itself with energy and other issues, has a fine piece, including before and after images, on the history of the U.S. interstate system and why roads were built through the middle of cities (unless people of influence stopped them — see Manhattan, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.)
    • Mar 22, 2016
  • Presidential thriller, co-author Bill Clinton, coming to bookstores in 2018

    June 2018 is the expected publication date for a novel collaboration by former President Bill Clinton and crime writer James Patterson.
    • May 9, 2017
  • IHOP coming down, but .....

    I always scan the Little Rock City Board for items of interest this week and this one caught my eye: A zoning measure required by a proposal to tear down the IHOP at Markham and University.
    • Apr 30, 2016

Most Shared

  • ASU to reap $3.69 million from estate of Jim and Wanda Lee Vaughn

    Arkansas State University announced today plans for spending an expected $3.69 million gift in the final distribution of the estate of Jim and Wanda Lee Vaughn, who died in 2013 and 2015 respectively.
  • Bad health care bill, again

    Wait! Postpone tax reform and everything else for a while longer because the Senate is going to try to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act one more time before September ends and while it can do it with the votes of only 50 senators.
  • Sex on campus

    Look, the Great Campus Rape Crisis was mainly hype all along. What Vice President Joe Biden described as an epidemic of sexual violence sweeping American college campuses in 2011 was vastly overstated.
  • The inadequate legacy of Brown

    LRSD continues to abdicate its responsibility to educate poor black students.

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation