Jon Woods has apparent way to restore tax money to chambers of commerce | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Jon Woods has apparent way to restore tax money to chambers of commerce

Posted By on Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:10 PM

HELP FOR THE CHAMBERS: Sen. Jon Woods offers some.
  • HELP FOR THE CHAMBERS: Sen. Jon Woods offers some.
The chambers of commerce apparently have their vehicle to restore tax subsidies put in jeopardy by Circuit Judge Mackie Pierce's ruling that the Arkansas Constitution forbids local tax money contributions to private corporations such as chambers of commerce.

Pierce ruled in a lawsuit supported by the Arkansas Public Law Center. He said contracts in Little Rock and North Little Rock were poorly disguised — "lipstick on a pig" — artifices to avoid the constitutional prohibition and enjoined them. Such contracts — some with more care to legal niceties than others — are commonplace around the state. A final version of Pierce's order is still in the drafting process, but chambers apparently have been working behind the scenes

Here's a constitutional amendment proposed by Sen. Jon Woods of Springdale, home to a chamber long a beneficiary of public tax dollars. It ppears aimed at  legalizing these payments.

It purports to encourage economic development. I think this is the key phrase: 

TO ALLOW PUBLIC ENTITIES TO FINANCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES WITH FINANCIAL INCENTIVES

What better incentive than to pay the salaries and benefits of local chamber of commerce officials, which Little Rock and North Little Rock and others have been doing in cumulative millions over the years? Of course, this language would have even broader application. It would allow direct contributions by cities to private businesses, to bribe them to locate somewhere — even merely to move across the Arkansas River from one city to another.

Cities already may enter legitimate — emphasis, legitimate — service contracts. They could request proposals from all comers to provide economic development consulting with specific parameters. They could require explicit performance reports. They could require specific disclosure of expenses. Here, the cities just provide a flat subsidy to operate the chamber, payments to support what the chamber was doing with private money in the first place. It is more offensive to the public because the chambers are political operations. They lobby against unions, workers compensation, universal health care, progressive taxation and any number of other issues on which strong public divisions exist. It's legal, but taxpayers shouldn't finance lobbying against their interests. (Here and elsewhere, taxpayers provide both direct subsidies to chambers and subsidies to regional development organization operated by chambers — same kettle of fish.)

A legislature soon to consider a law to prohibit public employees from lobbying, if it approves this, will approve of shipping money by the truckload to chambers of commerce for lobbying.

Sen. Jon Woods is the right man to tote this corporate welfare. He's the mastermind of Amendment 94, the new "ethics" amendment. It allows Woods, who has no real job outside the legislature, to serve longer at the legislature, soon with a 150 percent pay raIse, and to draw full per diem, including for days not worked and including days where lobbyists have lined up to feed andwater him for free.

If you don't think  freebies don't pay dividends, see corporate welfare proposals such as this.

Tags: , , , , ,


Sign up for the Daily Update email
Favorite

Comments (13)

Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Rutledge opponent hits her socializing with corporate interests

    Mike Lee, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, has criticized Attorney General Leslie Rutledge over recent reports of her participation at private meetings where corporate interests make big contributions to a political group she heads for access to state legal officers.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Women's March planned in Arkansas to mark Trump inauguration

    Speaking of Donald Trump and in answer to a reader's question: There will be a women's march in Arkansas on Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, as well as the national march planned in Washington.
    • Dec 30, 2016
  • Arkansas legislature rejects bipartisan effort to study race relations

    On Friday, the Arkansas Legislative Council soundly rejected a bipartisan effort by two senators to to create a temporary legislative subcommittee to study race relations in the state.
    • Sep 15, 2017
  • Campus gun bill clears committee

    The so-called compromise amendment that will allow anyone 25 or older with a training certificate carry a concealed weapon on public college campuses was approved in a Senate committee this afternoon.
    • Feb 21, 2017

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Slideshows

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation