Bill that may have hindered public photography vetoed by Hutchinson | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Bill that may have hindered public photography vetoed by Hutchinson

Posted By on Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:05 PM

click to enlarge VETOED: Governor says bill would have restricted fere speech and burdened photographers. - MORGUEFILE
  • MORGUEFILE
  • VETOED: Governor says bill would have restricted fere speech and burdened photographers.

Gov. Asa Hutchinson
has vetoed SB 79, a bill that was intended to "protect the names, voices, signatures, photographs, and likenesses of the citizens of the state from exploitation and unauthorized commercial use without the citizen’s consent."

After reviewing the bill, Hutchinson apparently agreed that the bill was too broadly written. In a statement, he said:

“In its current form, the bill unnecessarily restricts free expression and thus could have a chilling effect on freedom of speech and freedom of the press. In addition, SB79 exempts certain types of noncommercial speech while failing to exempt other forms of noncommercial speech. The absence of these exemptions could result in unnecessary litigation and suppress Arkansans who engage in artistic expression.”

The bill was authored by Sen. Jon Woods (R-Springdale) and Rep. Greg Leding (D-Fayetteville). Leding said earlier in the session that it was prompted by the family of Frank Broyles, concerned about the potential use of his likeness for commercial purposes.

But after the bill was passed by the legislature, photographers in Arkansas and elsewhere reacted with alarm, saying that the plain language of SB 79 could require anyone who uses any picture for any purpose that could conceivably be construed as "commercial" to get express written permission from every individual in the picture. The American Society of Media Photographers said of SB 79, "The implications of this bill are staggering. For example, an image showing recognizable people posted to the Internet for a use that would not require written consent anywhere else in the world could leave you open to a lawsuit just because someone in Arkansas could view it online."

Here's the governor's full veto letter:


A quick explainer about veto power in Arkansas: A gubernatorial veto can be easily overridden by the legislature. All it takes is a simple majority vote of both houses, which a bill would have required in order to reach the governor's desk in the first place. So, the legislature could override the governor and force SB 79 into law anyway.

However, overriding the wishes of the governor isn't something the legislature does lightly, especially when they're of the same party. It's unlikely that a Republican General Assembly would defy a Republican governor just to pass SB 79, which is a bill of relatively little consequence.

On a high-profile bill like HB 1228, though, the political calculations are different. It's entirely possible that if Hutchinson were to unilaterally veto such a significant piece of legislation without consulting with Republican legislators first, his own party might feel inclined to reject his wishes and overrule him with a simple majority vote. That would be quite an embarrassment, signalling that his control of the GOP caucus isn't as solid as it might seem from the outside.

Hutchinson thrives on cautious, logical negotiation, not frontal confrontation. But as pressure builds on him to veto HB 1228, he's in quite a dilemma. No surprise, then, that he's seeking a compromise solution instead.

Tags: , , , , , ,


Favorite

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

More by Benjamin Hardy

  • Supreme Court overturns contempt order against DHS for at-home services rule

    The justices were split, 5-2, with Chief Justice Dan Kemp and Justice Jo Hart dissenting. The ruling appears to have no immediate impact for ARChoices beneficiaries.
    • Apr 18, 2019
  • Update: State Supreme Court orders new trial in Torres capital murder case

    The court remanded the case for a new trial. The reversal was due to an underlying flaw in the legal arguments made by prosecutors in the case, turning on the question of whether an Arkansas trial court had jurisdiction in regards to the underlying felony of rape.
    • Apr 18, 2019
  • Arkansas Medicaid sees enrollment bump

    Though the rise is modest, it is notable because the Medicaid expansion population has shrunk almost every month for the past two years. As highlighted by Governor Hutchinson, enrollment peaked at around 330,000 in early 2017 but has been declining ever since.
    • Apr 15, 2019
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Little Rock school activists announce events for 60th anniversary of Central High crisis

    The group is not affiliated with the official "Reflections of Progress" commemoration of the 60th anniversary. However, at least two of the Little Rock Nine may be joining the group for an event at 2:30 p.m. at the state Capitol in the Old Supreme Court Chamber.
    • Sep 14, 2017
  • Trump tariffs hit farmers hard

    Well, the trade war has begun and the early returns for farmers are not good — sharp reductions in the prices for soybeans and corn. You may have heard that Arkansas, which overwhelmingly supported Donald Trump, has some agricultural interests, particularly in soybeans.
    • Jul 6, 2018
  • Arkansas legislature rejects bipartisan effort to study race relations

    On Friday, the Arkansas Legislative Council soundly rejected a bipartisan effort by two senators to to create a temporary legislative subcommittee to study race relations in the state.
    • Sep 15, 2017

Most Recent Comments

 

© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation