U.S. Supreme Court hears landmark same-sex marriage case; crucial Kennedy has questions for both sides | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

U.S. Supreme Court hears landmark same-sex marriage case; crucial Kennedy has questions for both sides

Posted By on Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:37 AM

HISTORIC DAY: Crowd gathers for arguments on same-sex marriage case. - HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN
  • Human Rights Campaign
  • HISTORIC DAY: Crowd gathers for arguments on same-sex marriage case.

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments this morning on the consolidation of appeals of rulings in same-sex marriage cases around the country.

scotusblog.com live blogged the action here.

Comments from the justices seemed to follow along expected lines, though I note this reporting on comments by Justice Anthony Kennedy, viewed as the potential swing vote for marriage equality.

Justice Kennedy said he had "a word on his mind .. and that word is millennia"

He pointed out that the definition of marriage had prevailed for millennia and it seemed a fast change; on the other hand, he noted that the time between Lawrence and this case was about equal to the time between Brown and Loving — this raised the question for him of whether this might all be too fast to redefine such a long standing institution

Commentators have also noted liberal Justice Stephen Breyer's question of the plaintiffs' attorney about leaving the decision to the states. The lawyer made the point that the choice is not only between the court and states, but also involves a decision on the part of the people who wish to marry.

And what of the sometimes pivotal Chief Justice John Roberts? A comment on scotusblog:

If court decides, said Roberts “there will be no more debate” on same-sex marriage, which “can close minds.”

When it was defenders of the ban's turn for questions, Kennedy had questions more heartening (more scotusblog analysis):

He said that his sense was that a principal purpose of marriage was to afford dignity to the couples, which is denied to same-sex couples.

He also said that he thought that the fact that same-sex couples raise adopted children cut strongly against the state's arguments.

That said, the balance between Justice Kennedy's comments in the first and second halves of the argument leaves things in a state of flux. You couldn't confidently predict the outcome.

He is clearly weighing two things: the definition of marriage has been the same for "millennia" versus the fact that denying marriage to same-sex couples is an affront to their dignity (and that of the children they raise) - See more at: 

And the chief justice also asked this question, which could give comfort to marriage equality supporters: He asked whether bans on same-sex marriage amount to sex discrimination.

Here's the first write-through by the New York Times.

Recording of the oral arguments available at this link.

  • PS: You'll undoubtedly be happy to know that a Mike Huckabee support filed an amicus brief today in opposition to equality. Among others, it says judicial supremacy is hooey. Fear not. As a scotusblog link his news release mentions, there are dozens of amicus briefs and most are ignored by the Supreme Court.


Tags: , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (22)

Showing 1-22 of 22

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-22 of 22

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Sunday open line

    Open line and “news” on the Hog football coach.
    • Nov 19, 2017
  • The Clintons side by side in Little Rock 25 years after

    Bill and Hillary Clinton side by side taking questions from Donald Carville. The only thing more I could have asked for was a seat for Donald Trmp to handle the same topics.
    • Nov 19, 2017
  • Arkansas a leader in laws against better working conditions

    The Economic Policy Institute has compiled a national look at state laws that prevent local governments from mandating better working conditions in cities and counties than state law provides.As you might expect, Arkansas is among the leaders
    • Nov 19, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Judge anticipates punishment of lawyers in Fort Smith class action case

    Federal Judge P.K. Holmes of Fort Smith issued a 32-page ruling yesterday indicating he contemplates punishment of 16 lawyers who moved a class action lawsuit against an insurance company out of his court to a state court in Polk County after a settlement had been worked out.
    • Apr 15, 2016
  • Police identify two women found fatally shot on Chicot Road

    Little Rock police have identified two women found dead of gunshot wounds in an SUV parked next to a vacant trailer in a mobile home park at 11500 Chicot Road.
    • May 16, 2017
  • IHOP coming down, but .....

    I always scan the Little Rock City Board for items of interest this week and this one caught my eye: A zoning measure required by a proposal to tear down the IHOP at Markham and University.
    • Apr 30, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation