8th Circuit cancels hearing on Arkansas same-sex marriage case | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

8th Circuit cancels hearing on Arkansas same-sex marriage case

Posted By on Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:55 PM

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals announced today that it had canceled hearings scheduled May 12 on appeals from four states, including Arkansas, of lower court decisions invalidating bans on same-sex marriage. It is awaiting the U.S. Supreme Court decision in similar cases from other circuits.

The decision was announced on the court's website and posted links to identical orders in each case.

On the court’s own motion, oral arguments and any further consideration of these cases will be deferred pending the Supreme Court of the United States’ decisions in Nos. 14-556, 14- 562, 14-571, and 14-574 James Obergefell, et al. v. Richard Hodges, etc., et al.

The reference is to arguments yesterday before the U.S. Supreme Court, which is expected to rule by June. A decision by the Supreme Court won't necessarily address issues identical to those in the 8th Circuit cases, just as the decision won't resolve all questions pending in a separate case before the Arkansas Supreme Court.

The Arkansas court could, for example, rule that the state's own equal protection provision in our constitution prevents discrimination against gay people, a holding that would be rooted in the decision that overturned the state's criminal sodomy statute. That would be courageous decision, of coure, should the U.S. Supreme Court say states are free under the U.S. Constitution to discriminate against gay people in state law.

PS: New polling shows a majority of the people in Iowa — Iowa — support same-sex marriage, 50-41. 80 percent say it has had no or a positive effect on their lives.

UPDATE: Attorney General Leslie Rutledge, who is fighting to preserve legal discrimination against gay couples in Arkansas, issued a statement of disappointment:

“I am disappointed by the Eighth Circuit’s decision not to hold oral argument in Arkansas's appeal in defense of the constitutionality of Arkansas Amendment 83. This case is important to the people of Arkansas, and the Eighth Circuit has the authority to rule regardless of what is occurring before the U.S. Supreme Court.”

Tags: , , ,

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Ted Suhl seeks Supreme Court review of conviction. Also a note on a similar case

    Ted Suhl has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review his federal bribery conviction for giving money to Steven Jones, a legislator and an official of the state Human Services Department, which oversaw millions in Medicaid reimbursements to his in-patient and out-patient businesses working with troubled youth. Which reminds me of the ongoing Preferred Family Healthcare probe.
    • Jun 25, 2018
  • 1,000 words in mug shot after murder arrest

    A murder arrest mug shot speaks volumes.
    • Jun 25, 2018
  • Supreme Court again dodges gay bias case

    The U.S. Supreme Court today in an unsigned order said a lower court should reconsider the case of a florist in the state of Washington who refused to make an arrangement for a same-sex wedding.
    • Jun 25, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation