Hillary Clinton tacks left on immigration reform, a strategy that might help her in the general election | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Hillary Clinton tacks left on immigration reform, a strategy that might help her in the general election

Posted By on Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:42 PM

Hillary Clinton continues to appeal to the liberal base in the early-going of her candidacy for president, first with a speech critiquing "mass incarceration" last week, and then yesterday with a speech on comprehensive immigration reform that was more forceful, and more liberal, than most expected. She pledged to fight for a path to citizenship, greater protections from deportation for many undocumented immigrants, and reforms to the immigration detention system. Crucially, she also backed President Obama's use of executive action, and said she would do even more: 

If Congress continues to refuse to act, as president, I would do everything possible under the law to go even further.

All this from a candidate who has generally been cautious on immigration in the past (and who was previously viewed with wariness from immigration reform advocates). Today? The headline on MSNBC"s Maddow Blog: "Clinton goes all in on immigration reform." At Vox: "Hillary just took a stunningly aggressive stance on immigration reform." 

Of course, Clinton could always move back to the center in the general election. But it's possible that, in addition to being more humane and better for economic growth, Clinton's move to the left on immigration represents a canny strategy looking ahead to November 2016. Clinton is aiming to force the issue with GOP candidates, who are in a tough spot: a Republican might not be able to survive the primary without going full Tea Party nativist, but pissing off Hispanic voters is likely to be a political disaster in the general. By staking out a strong position, Clinton is putting on the heat. From her comments yesterday: 

Make no mistake, today not a single Republican candidate, announced or potential, is clearly and consistently supporting a path to citizenship. Not one. When they talk about legal status, that is code for second-class status.

New York's Jonathan Chait called it "a power play that demonstrates how swiftly the immigration issue has moved in her party’s favor, and how she plans to box in her opponents." 

Republicans want to avoid clear stances, Chait argues, and Clinton is forcing the issue: 

By clarifying the questions Republicans would like to keep muddled, she is making the conversation as uncomfortable for them as possible. She is likewise demonstrating how quickly the political power of the immigrants-rights movement has blossomed.

As a side note, I'd argue (cynically, I suppose) that the other piece of context here is that in an increasingly polarized electorate, she really had nothing to lose here. Her husband's coalition depended on voters who simply aren't going to vote for Democrats in 2016. The demographic trends suggest that Hillary Clinton is better off courting a coalition that looks more like Barack Obama's. 

Tags: , , , , , , ,


Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

More by David Ramsey

Readers also liked…

  • Your daily dose of Jason Rapert

    Sen. Jason Rapert really, really didn't like it when a KATV reporter asked him about the hypocrisy of his political arguments.
    • Feb 4, 2017
  • French Hill votes against disaster aid to Puerto Rico

    Republican U.S. Rep. French Hill alone among Arkansas's House delegation voted last week against a measure that provided $36.5 billion in disaster aid, a portion  for hurricane-ravaged Puerto Rico as well as money for wildfire response and to support the flood insurance program.
    • Oct 14, 2017
  • Campus gun bill clears committee

    The so-called compromise amendment that will allow anyone 25 or older with a training certificate carry a concealed weapon on public college campuses was approved in a Senate committee this afternoon.
    • Feb 21, 2017


Most Viewed

  • Breaking: Ken Starr doesn't like the Clintons. Look who's talking about morality

    Surprise. Former Whitewater persecutor Kenneth Starr's new book trashes Bill and Hillary Clinton, as the Democrat-Gazette made clear this morning. You'd think Starr was some moral exemplar as he whines about his "persona non grata" status in Arkansas.
  • Pine Bluff native wages war on fraternity culture

    Bloomberg has an interesting feature on Deborah Dunklin Tipton of Memphis, a native of Pine Bluff and heiress to an Arkansas agricultural fortune, who's put her money to work investigating the death of her son Robert in 2012 of what's been ruled an accidental drug overdose following fraternity hazing at High Point University in North Carolina.
  • Judge denies Jon Woods' request to be free pending appeal UPDATE

    Judge Timothy Brooks has rejected former state Sen. Jon Woods' request that he be allowed to remain free pending appeal of his public corruption conviction to the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals. UPDATED with news on co-defendant Randell Shelton and a request for a trial delay by Jeremy Hutchinson in another public corruption case.
  • School superintendent Poore not registered to vote

    Blogger Russ Racop dug up a factoid of interest this week on Little Rock School Superintendent Mike Poore: He's not registered to vote in Pulaski County.
  • Tuesday's open line and the daily report

    The open line and a video roundup of news and comment.

Most Recent Comments


© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation