Arkansas Supreme Court rules predictably in case created to delay same-sex marriage ruling | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, May 7, 2015

Arkansas Supreme Court rules predictably in case created to delay same-sex marriage ruling

Posted By on Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:17 AM

click to enlarge RERUN: More redundancy from the state Supreme Court on the marriage question. - COURTS.ARKANSAS.GOV
  • COURTS.ARKANSAS.GOV
  • RERUN: More redundancy from the state Supreme Court on the marriage question.

The Arkansas Supreme Court ruled today that the Court's current seven members should decide Smith v. Wright, the case challenging the state's ban on same-sex marriage.

The opinion issued by the Court today was in regards to a secondary case over the question of which justices should rule on the original lawsuit.

Here's the opinion, with Justice Karen Baker writing for the majority:


Three of the seven justices recused themselves from today's opinion: Justice Rhonda Wood because the decision directly concerned her participation, and Chief Justice Jim Hannah and Justice Paul Danielson because they were strongly opposed to hearing the secondary case at all. In Hannah's recusal letter, he said he believed the new case was created out of "whole cloth" by the majority of the court in order to delay the decision in the original marriage case.

In April, Governor Asa Hutchinson appointed Shawn Womack, Betty Dickey and Brett Watson as special justices to hear the secondary case. In a separate concurrence today, Watson said he believed the majority's opinion was written too broadly, though he agreed on the fundamental question of allowing Wood to participate in the marriage case.

Previously, Tippi McCullough of the Stonewall Democrats filed a complaint with the Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission against the remaining justices — Karen Baker, Courtney Goodson, Jo Hart and Robin Wynne — on the basis of the recusal letters from Danielson and Hannah. 

According to the Times' sources, the Court voted on the original case Nov. 20, with one justice drawing the majority opinion. That opinion wasn't completed by the end of the year, and soon thereafter the composition of the court changed due to the November elections.

Attorney General Leslie Rutledge filed a motion in April contending that the matter should be reargued and that the current members of the Court should decide the case. Plaintiffs' attorneys originally objected to the new panel deciding the case, but relented in hopes of speeding up the case (which further should've made the secondary case unnecessary). 

Special Justice Robert McCorkindale and now-retired Justice Donald Corbin were part of the panel of justices who heard the original appeal in November. McCorkindale served in place of former Justice Cliff Hoofman, who recused from the original case and now serves on the Arkansas Court of Appeals. Justice Wood filled Hoofman's place on the Court. Justice Wynne was elected to replace Corbin.

What's next? Either the current Court will conference again, vote again, assign a majority opinion again and so forth, or it'll ask for oral arguments again. In either case, as we've said before, don't expect a decision before the U.S. Supreme Court has its say.

Tags: , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

More by Lindsey Millar

  • An Arkansas-themed gift guide

    Get out your shopping list.
    • Nov 23, 2017
  • The Marshmallows on Sweet Potatoes Edition

    The legacy of Bill and Hillary Clinton and answers to readers' questions on politics, ancient canoes and more — on this week's podcast.
    • Nov 22, 2017
  • The Tom Cotton's Bright Idea Edition

    The downfall of Jeff Long, Tom Cotton’s terrible contribution to the Republican tax plan, a no-bid consulting contract in state government and #metoo in Arkansas — all covered on this week's podcast.
    • Nov 17, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Judge anticipates punishment of lawyers in Fort Smith class action case

    Federal Judge P.K. Holmes of Fort Smith issued a 32-page ruling yesterday indicating he contemplates punishment of 16 lawyers who moved a class action lawsuit against an insurance company out of his court to a state court in Polk County after a settlement had been worked out.
    • Apr 15, 2016
  • Trump immigration protest at LR: Quick and fierce

    It was not even 24 hours ago that Sophia Said, director of the Interfaith Center; City Director Kathy Webb and others decided to organize a protest today of Donald Trump's executive order that has left people from Muslim countries languishing in airports or unable to come to the US at all — people with visas, green cards,a  post-doc graduate student en route to Harvard, Google employees abroad, families. I got the message today before noon; others didn't find out until it was going on. But however folks found out, they turned out in huge numbers, more than thousand men, women and children, on the grounds of the state Capitol to listen to speakers from all faiths and many countries.
    • Jan 29, 2017
  • LR speakers blast state board for double standard

    A series of speakers, beginning with Sen. Joyce Elliott, denounced what they saw as a hidden agenda favoring charter schools at the state Department of Education and asked the state Board of Education for return of local control.
    • May 12, 2016

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation