Fear and the U.S. Supreme Court | Arkansas Blog

Sunday, July 5, 2015

Fear and the U.S. Supreme Court

Posted By on Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 7:59 AM

Linda Greenhouse, who once covered the U.S. Supreme Court for the New York Times, still writes smartly on the court, including this latest about the fear-based campaigns by Republican politicians to use recent court rulings for political purposes. She notes that fear is a tool in the dissents on the court as well.

Not that any of the Republicans have asked me for advice, but I’ll give them some anyway: Fomenting backlash is not a winning strategy. Just as fire needs oxygen, stoking public anger against the Supreme Court can’t succeed in a vacuum. Backlash needs to be fed and sustained by fear: fear of crime; fear of a threat to “our Southern way of life”; fear, in the case of abortion, of a revolution in women’s traditional role in the family and in society.

And what, exactly, are people supposed to be afraid of now? A same-sex married couple with affordable health insurance?

Reading the opinions in the marriage case, Obergefell v. Hodges, I was struck by how determined the dissenters were to fan the flames of resentment. Be afraid, be very afraid, the dissenting justices warn those with religious objections to same-sex marriage. People who “cling to old beliefs” will be left having to “whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes,” Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. cautioned. “The majority graciously suggests that religious believers may continue to ‘advocate’ and ‘teach’ their views of marriage,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote, adding: “The First Amendment guarantees, however, the freedom to ‘exercise’ religion. Ominously, however, that is not a word the majority uses.” That is quite a word choice, “ominously.”

But is it ominous? Greenhouse notes that recent polling shows majority support for both the health care and marriage rulings.

So too is there danger in a recent Gallup poll indicating that for the first time in seven years, more Americans identify themselves as “pro-choice” than “pro-life.”

A week after the end of a remarkable court term, the message may be this: It’s not the voters, but the Republican presidential candidates, who should be afraid.

Greenhouse, of course, doesn't live in Arkansas. Much less Toad Suck.

Tags: , ,

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (13)

Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • We have met the enemy: The open line

    The open line with a dose of Trump and other unhappy news.
    • Jul 15, 2018
  • Welcome to the United States, children

    Recommended reading: The New York Times' report on the conditions for the hundreds of children being held in detention since they arrived at U.S. borders seeking asylum. There are many rules and they included no touching of other children, not even a hug for a little brother or sister.
    • Jul 15, 2018
  • Bills arrive for petition campaigns, including term limits

    Filings are expected next week on the campaigns to put a minimum wage increase and casino gambling expansion on the November ballot. One other campaign reported financial information last week
    • Jul 15, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation