UPDATED: Couple with court order gets birth certificate; others turned away | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

UPDATED: Couple with court order gets birth certificate; others turned away

Posted By on Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:25 AM

click to enlarge AT THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT: Mothers seeking birth certificates today had mixed results. Terrah Pavan, a lawsuit plaintiff (right), got a birth certificate. The mother at left, Jennifer Gardner-Glaze, did not. - MICHAEL HIBBLEN/KUAR
  • Michael Hibblen/KUAR
  • AT THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT: Mothers seeking birth certificates today had mixed results. Terrah Pavan, a lawsuit plaintiff (right), got a birth certificate. The mother at left, Jennifer Gardner-Glaze, did not.

click to enlarge DONE: Marissa Pavan with newly issued birth certificate. - MICHAEL HIBBLEN/KUAR
  • Michael Hibblen/KUAR
  • DONE: Marissa Pavan with newly issued birth certificate.
A same-sex couple that won a court order that their names should appear on their children's birth certificate went to the state Health Department today to get the birth certificate. They succeeded, but a couple of other couples did not.

Judge Tim Fox yesterday released his written order, affirming an earlier ruling from the bench that three married same-sex couples who sued were entitled to have names listed on birth certificates just as heterosexual couples are able to do. He noted that a birth certificate doesn't provide  proof of biological parentage. Legal rights aren't necessarily conferred by birth certificate listing either. He said the larger process would take correction by changes in state Health Department rules and perhaps legislation.

Here's John Lynch's article in the Arkanas Democrat-Gazette on yesterday's court proceeding.

Fox denied the state's request for a stay of his ruling pending appeal. Fox said there's no staying constitutional rights.

Here's Fox's detailed opinion in the case.

UPDATE: Michael Hibblen of KUAR reports that the Health Department issued birth certificates ONLY to a couple that was one of three plaintiff couples in the suit, Marisa and Terrah Pavan. Two other couples who were not plaintiffs but who were also married with children, sought birth certificates today, too. Information was taken from them, but birth certificates weren't issued, Hibblen said, though there's some confusion on precisely what counsel the Health Department gave all three couples who went there today. I'm seeking comment from Health Department and the attorney general's office on the matter. It would appear that the state is processing certificates only for those with court orders, such as a legal adoption. Attorney General Leslie Rutledge still plans an appeal, so far as is known.

NOTE CORRECTION: I've been struggling to get the proper names with the photos of the Pavans and have revised original captions.

UPDATE: Meg Mirivel, spokeswoman for the Health Department, said the department would issue birth certificates to plaintiffs in the suit. (At least one couple took formal adoption steps, given uncertainty of the birth certificate process). Others may submit information and be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, as heterosexual couples seeking amended birth certificates are evaluated.

The department hasn't decided if it will appeal the ruling in the case of the three couples. And as for adopting a rule to make it easier for same-sex couples to be listed on birth certificates (a step other states have taken), Mirivel said, "We are still evaluating our next steps." She noted that the judge had said legislation might be necessary.

I can guess that the Health Department will NOT on its own adopt rules making life easier for same-sex couples. That leaves the question of how the Arkansas legislature will react to the necessity to make various rules comply with marriage equality (Fox's ruling cited a long list). Based on the record so far, massive resistance by the legislature and the attorney general seem likely.

This is all a spokesman for Attorney General Rutledge would say:

Attorney General Rutledge has advised the Department of Health to follow Judge Fox’s order with regard to amending the birth certificates of the three minors in this case.

BUT NOW THIS UPDATE: Added to the statement above was this sentence:

However, to avoid confusion and uncertainty created by other parts of the order, the Attorney General will ask the Arkansas Supreme Court to stay the decision and will appeal.”

Tags: , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (10)

Showing 1-10 of 10

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-10 of 10

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Auditor Lea caught not telling the truth

    State Auditor Andrea Lea, who began her tenure in statewide office with a degree of competence unseen in some other Republican counterparts (think Treasurer Dennis Milligan particularly), is becoming more deeply mired in a political scandal.
    • Mar 4, 2016
  • Hospitality, restaurant groups oppose bathroom bill

    Add the restaurant and hospitality association to those opposed to Sen. Linda Collins-Smith's bill to keep transgender people out of public restrooms that match their gender identity.
    • Mar 16, 2017
  • Another Republican miracle-working governor

    Great piece in Washington Post on the budget crisis in Louisiana. Big tax cuts and corporate welfare will do that to a state, particularly to a state whose previous governor, Republican Bobby Jindal, refused to join the Obamacare-funded Medicaid expansion. There's a lesson there for Arkansas.
    • Mar 4, 2016

Most Shared

  • Discussion: State killing of the mentally ill

    The Arkansas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and others will have a forum on mental illness and the death penalty at 6:30 p.m. Monday at the Bowen School of Law's Friday Courtroom.

Most Viewed

  • Dear Little Rock,

    This is not a love letter, Little Rock, though we do love you. This is an intervention.

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation