Taxi driver sues the city over cab monopoly | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Taxi driver sues the city over cab monopoly

Posted By on Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:39 PM

click to enlarge Leininger with one of his cabs.
  • Leininger with one of his cabs.
Ken Leininger, owner of Ken's Cabs, filed suit against the city today, claiming its contract with Yellow Cab violates the Arkansas Constitution's prohibition against monopolies.

Leininger, who City Attorney Tom Carpenter believes has been operating anyway, applied for a permit last year but was turned down because he was unable to show the company would serve as a “public convenience and necessity,” as required by ordinance. He appealed to the city Board of Directors; they did not overturn the denial but recommended he apply again this year, Carpenter said. To Carpenter's knowledge, he has not reapplied. Carpenter said he had not seen the suit.

The city does restrict new tax permits, Carpenter said. Leininger would have had to show that Yellow Cab (Greater Little Rock Taxi Service LLC) was not adequately serving the whole city. 

The suit was filed in Pulaski Circuit Court. Leininger's lawyer is Chris Burks, who is working with the Institute for Justice in Virginia.
 
A full press release is on the jump.

Lawsuit Seeks to End Little Rock’s Taxi Monopoly

Institute for Justice Joins with Entrepreneur to Stop Government-Imposed Taxi Monopoly
Little Rock, Ark.—The Arkansas Constitution says that monopolies are “contrary to the genius of a republic, and shall not be allowed,” but that has not stopped the City of Little Rock from enforcing an ordinance that grants a monopoly to the only taxi company in town. Today, the Institute for Justice has joined a local taxi-driver-turned-entrepreneur in filing a lawsuit that seeks to end the city’s taxi monopoly once and for all.

The City of Little Rock currently prohibits any new cab companies from competing with its one existing company, Greater Little Rock Taxi Service, LLC (“Yellow Cab”), by allowing new taxi permits to be issued only if “public convenience and necessity” leave no other choice and if doing so will not harm the existing permit holder. In other words, a newcomer to the Little Rock taxi market needs to obtain arbitrary approval from the city government and permission from their competitor.

After eight years of working as a driver for Yellow Cab, Ken Leininger decided to start his own business. He founded Ken’s Cab, a taxi company that only uses hybrid vehicles and offers reliable service at competitive fares. Ken believed he could deliver a better service to the people of Little Rock, provide a better deal for drivers, and successfully compete with Yellow Cab. But when Ken tried to get permits for his new business early last year, his applications were repeatedly denied.

Little Rock’s Fleet Services Department admitted that Ken met all of the requirements other than “public convenience and necessity” and approval from Yellow Cab, and therefore denied Ken’s application. Shocked, Ken appealed the decision to Little Rock’s Board of Directors. When the Board heard Ken’s appeal at its meeting in October, Fleet Services again admitted that Ken met all of the other requirements. Some Directors even admitted that Little Rock had created a private monopoly. But when Yellow Cab’s owner asked the Board to reject Ken’s appeal, it did, preserving the monopoly for Yellow Cab.

“Little Rock has only one taxi company, and it is illegal to start a second one,” said Institute for Justice Attorney Justin Pearson, who represents the plaintiffs in the lawsuit. “The government should not be Yellow Cab’s henchman, doing what’s best for Yellow Cab rather than what’s best for the citizens of Little Rock.”

Ken was not going to give up his right to earn a living, especially when he felt that consumers—not the government—should decide whether a new taxi business is “necessary.” So, he teamed up with the Institute for Justice to end the Little Rock taxi monopoly.

“It doesn’t seem right that the government can tell me that I can’t have a taxi service when I know I’ve fulfilled all of the requirements and more,” explained Ken Leininger.

“As Ken’s story shows, monopolies are harmful to small businesses and to customers, which is why the Arkansas Constitution prohibits them,” said IJ Attorney Allison Daniel, who also represents Ken. “Unfortunately, it will take a lawsuit to make Little Rock’s Board of Directors acknowledge that.”

Tags: , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (9)

Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

More by Leslie Newell Peacock

  • UAMS layoffs: Details for faculty

    Emails released under the state Freedom of Information Act reveal discussions at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences about how to terminate tenure-track and tenured faculty.
    • Jan 13, 2018
  • Lawmakers weigh in: Haiti's not a shithole. It's just depraved.

    In trying to explain the president's vulgar indictment of millions of people today, U.S. Rep. Steve Womack told 49/20 News he tries "to look beyond the exact words he [Trump] uses." The 3rd District congressman used a different word: depraved. Un-Norwegianlike.
    • Jan 12, 2018
  • UAMS closes weight-loss clinic; staff at Children's may be hired by research institute

    The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences has terminated its weight loss program due to budget constraints. The move was part of UAMS' termination of 600 positions, including 258 employees, on Monday.
    • Jan 11, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Civil War over in Fort Smith; lawyer strikes his Rebel mascot battle tent

    KSFM reports that Joey McCutchen, the lawyer who's been trying to restart the Civil War in Fort Smith over the School Board's decision to drop the Rebel mascot and related trappingsfor Southside High School, is dropping his School Board takeover campaign.
    • May 27, 2016
  • Two plead in fraud of sheriff's office

    A former employee of the Pulaski County sheriff and a North Little Rock woman who sold goods to the sheriff's office have pleaded guilty to mail fraud in a scheme to steal from the sheriff's office, according to a news release from the U.S. attorney's office.
    • May 16, 2017
  • The long and winding road: No exception yet for 30 Crossing

    The Arkansas highway department's representative on the Metroplan board of directors told the board today that the department is requesting an exception to the planning agency's cap on six lanes for its 30 Crossing project to widen Interstate 30 from six to 10 (and more) lanes.
    • Jun 29, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation