Supreme Court refuses to hear Walmart appeal of $187 million class action case | Arkansas Blog

Monday, April 4, 2016

Supreme Court refuses to hear Walmart appeal of $187 million class action case

Posted By on Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:38 AM

The U.S. Supreme Court today refused to hear an appeal of lower court decisions that could mean $187 million in payments to thousands of Walmart and Sam's Club workers in Pennsylvania who weren't paid for work during lunch breaks.

The first decision in the case came from a jury in 2006.

Walmart fought the class action designation in the case. It argued that each worker should have to sue individually.

Wells Fargo similarly lost a bid to fight a class action over overdraft fees on credit cards. Two weeks ago, Tyson Foods also lost a fight against class action status for Iowa woekrs seeking pay for time spent donning and doffing safety clothing.

The labor-supported group Making Change at Walmart cheered the news today:

“Today, the highest court of the United States affirmed that Walmart workers have the right to be paid for every hour of hard work, not just the hours that Walmart wishes to acknowledge,” said Jess Levin, communications director for MCAW. “Earlier this year, a labor board administrative law judge ruled in favor of Walmart workers who were unlawfully retaliated against for participating in strikes. The tide is turning in this country against Walmart.”

Levin added: “The world’s largest retailer won’t be able to continue to mistreat its workers and get away with it. Walmart workers, when they come together, have a powerful voice that cannot be silenced, and these recent rulings are a testament to the countless hours of work they do every day, as well as their commitment to being treated fairly and with respect.”
Walmart also issued a statement:

We are disappointed the Supreme Court decided not to review our case. While we continue to believe these claims should not be bundled together in a class-action lawsuit, we respect the court's decision. We will now determine how we move forward in the trial court.

Most of these claims are over 10 years old. Walmart has had strong policies in place to make sure all associates receive their appropriate pay and break periods. We have taken additional steps over the last decade, including enhancing our timekeeping systems and additional training, to make sure all our associates understand the importance of those policies and comply with them.

Tags: , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Federal judge wants John Goodson to explain class action maneuvering

    A show-cause order filed Monday by federal Judge P.K. Holmes of Fort Smith indicates class action attorney John Goodson has some explaining to do about the move of a class action complaint against an insurance company from federal to state court with an instant pre-packaged settlement that has been criticized as a windfall for Goodson.
    • Dec 22, 2015
  • Satanic Temple: Make Rapert pay for Ten Commandments monument

    A petition drive has begun to encourage a demand that Sen. Jason Rapert pay for the legal fees in defending his Ten Commandments monument proposed for the state Capitol grounds. It's more work by the Satanic Temple, which has fought church-state entanglement around the country.
    • Aug 28, 2016
  • Auditor Lea caught not telling the truth

    State Auditor Andrea Lea, who began her tenure in statewide office with a degree of competence unseen in some other Republican counterparts (think Treasurer Dennis Milligan particularly), is becoming more deeply mired in a political scandal.
    • Mar 4, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation