U.S. Supreme Court preserves disclosure of political spending | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, April 5, 2016

U.S. Supreme Court preserves disclosure of political spending

Posted By on Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:23 AM

Right-wingers and dark money advocates have been making noise about legislative proposals to require more disclosure of spending in political races, particularly for judicial races. They're raised specious First Amendment claims against disclosure, claiming a right to privacy of contributions (though state and federal laws are full of requirements for disclosure of names in direct campaign spending.)

A relevant case passed through the U.S. Supreme Court yesterday.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review an appellate court ruling upholding a Mississippi campaign finance law that requires reporting by people or groups spending at least $200 to support or oppose a ballot measure.

Five Mississippi residents sued in 2011, arguing that the law limited their free speech and association rights. 
They lost.

It's time to end the dark money sewer and time particularly to upend laws that give a pass to obvious electioneering that avoids scrutiny for lack of magic words like Vote For or Against. If corporations may spend, let them disclose that spending. Who's electing our judges and lobbying for constitutional amendments and initiated acts?

Tags: , ,


Sign up for the Daily Update email
Favorite

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Rutledge opponent hits her socializing with corporate interests

    Mike Lee, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, has criticized Attorney General Leslie Rutledge over recent reports of her participation at private meetings where corporate interests make big contributions to a political group she heads for access to state legal officers.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Arkansas Supreme Court refuses to rehear invalidation of marijuana act

    The Arkansas Supreme Court today denied a request to rehear its decision invalidating Issue 7, the medical marijuana initiated act.
    • Nov 3, 2016
  • Women's March planned in Arkansas to mark Trump inauguration

    Speaking of Donald Trump and in answer to a reader's question: There will be a women's march in Arkansas on Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, as well as the national march planned in Washington.
    • Dec 30, 2016
  • Trump immigration protest at LR: Quick and fierce

    It was not even 24 hours ago that Sophia Said, director of the Interfaith Center; City Director Kathy Webb and others decided to organize a protest today of Donald Trump's executive order that has left people from Muslim countries languishing in airports or unable to come to the US at all — people with visas, green cards,a  post-doc graduate student en route to Harvard, Google employees abroad, families. I got the message today before noon; others didn't find out until it was going on. But however folks found out, they turned out in huge numbers, more than thousand men, women and children, on the grounds of the state Capitol to listen to speakers from all faiths and many countries.
    • Jan 29, 2017

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Slideshows

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation