Is Hutchinson's line-item veto scheme legal? | Arkansas Blog

Friday, April 15, 2016

Is Hutchinson's line-item veto scheme legal?

Posted By on Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:50 AM

click to enlarge ASA: Wants to save Obamacare through line-item veto. - BRIAN CHILSON
  • Brian Chilson
  • ASA: Wants to save Obamacare through line-item veto.

You've read here that Gov. Asa Hutchinson and his legislative leaders have cooked up a scheme to get the Obamacare Medicaid expansion approved with some procedural maneuvers.

The deal: The Medicaid budget will be amended to kill Arkansas Works, Hutchinson's new brand for the Obamacare expansion. The money is kept in the appropriation bill for all state medical services, however. The bill gets approved. The Terrible Ten who opposed Obamacare will have voted for a bill that kills Obamacare, knowing that when it reaches Hutchinson, he'll line item veto the provision killing Obamacare. The legislature can't come up with a majority to override the veto. Obamacare lives. The Terrible Ten claim they won.

It is one way to skin a cat, though I think it sets a poor precedent for future business. But .... is it legal?

An observer points me to a couple of past attorney general opinions on line item vetoes. These opinions have no force of law. But they are products of legal research unburdened by the partisan considerations that guide that office these days.

This is what the Constitution says about vetoes:

The Governor shall have power to disapprove any item or items of any bill making appropriation of money, embracing distinct items; and the part or parts of the bill approved shall be the law, and the item or items of appropriations disapproved shall be void, unless repassed according to the rules and limitations prescribed for the passage of other bills over the executive veto.

A 1997 opinion by Winston Bryant said a governor couldn't line-item veto a portion of an education appropriation that year. The analysis turned on whether an item vetoed "can be fairly characterized as setting aside or dedicating funds for a specified purpose, or whether instead it imposes a condition, limitation, restriction, or other proviso on the expenditure of the separately appropriated funds." It seems you could argue the Arkansas Works killer amendment is more of a limitation, rather than a specific appropriation. The 1997 opinion notes the Arkansas law lacked precedent for guidance. But the 1997 opinion said a governor couldn't veto a restriction without also vetoing the appropriation.

Then, in 2001, the attorney general was asked about a veto in a Finance and Administration appropriation. Bryant again noted the lack of precedent for guidance. Again citing similar rules in other states and their construction, he wrote:

The general view in this regard is that the governor cannot veto provisions in an appropriation which act as a qualification, condition, or restriction on the appropriation without also vetoing the entire appropriation itself. 
He also wrote:
As pointed out in Masciocchi, The Item Veto Power In Washington, 64 Wash. L. Rev. 891, the rationale for what is termed this “narrow view” is that “removal of conditions and restrictions supplants the governor’s intent with that of the legislature in violation of the separation of powers doctrine.”
Of course, we know from public comments that the governor's intent is to pass Obamacare while giving opponents a fig leaf. But, under well-established Arkansas law, the only gauge of  legal "intent" is the plain language of the law. It doesn't matter what's been said in legislative debate, by the governor or by anyone else.

The Arkansas Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter, presuming somebody like the anti-Obamacare Koch political organization sued to overturn this scheme if it passes. You'd have to like the chances of the law being upheld, given growing court deference to the legislature. But the past  attorney general's opinions illustrate the core flaw of this little scheme. When you have to stand the law on its ear to pass a law — all to cater to 10 tyrants — you haven't exactly distinguished yourself.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Sunday open line

    Open line and “news” on the Hog football coach.
    • Nov 19, 2017
  • The Clintons side by side in Little Rock 25 years after

    Bill and Hillary Clinton side by side taking questions from Donald Carville. The only thing more I could have asked for was a seat for Donald Trmp to handle the same topics.
    • Nov 19, 2017
  • Arkansas a leader in laws against better working conditions

    The Economic Policy Institute has compiled a national look at state laws that prevent local governments from mandating better working conditions in cities and counties than state law provides.As you might expect, Arkansas is among the leaders
    • Nov 19, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Judge anticipates punishment of lawyers in Fort Smith class action case

    Federal Judge P.K. Holmes of Fort Smith issued a 32-page ruling yesterday indicating he contemplates punishment of 16 lawyers who moved a class action lawsuit against an insurance company out of his court to a state court in Polk County after a settlement had been worked out.
    • Apr 15, 2016
  • UPDATE: Hutchinson moves to cover himself on cut to War Memorial Stadium

    Gov. Asa Hutchinson apparently felt the burn from KARK's exclusive Tuesday night on his plans to cut state support of War Memorial Stadium in half beginning July 1, 2018. He has a so-far secret plan to make the stadium self-sustaining. We bet that doesn't include state support.
    • Oct 20, 2016
  • LR speakers blast state board for double standard

    A series of speakers, beginning with Sen. Joyce Elliott, denounced what they saw as a hidden agenda favoring charter schools at the state Department of Education and asked the state Board of Education for return of local control.
    • May 12, 2016

Most Shared

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Sunday open line

    • Charlie Manson is dead yet Donald Trump lives......life ain't fair at all. Durango has the…

    • on November 20, 2017
  • Re: The Medicaid charade explained

    • Get THE 2017 BLANK ATM Programmed Card and cash money directly in any ATM Machine…

    • on November 20, 2017
  • Re: Sen. Greg Standridge dies at 50

    • He put up a good fight. I know his family is grieving. I wish his…

    • on November 19, 2017

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation