30 Crossing 3D videos assume more widening of I-30 | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, April 28, 2016

30 Crossing 3D videos assume more widening of I-30

Posted By on Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 3:35 PM

click to enlarge People at Tuesday's open house study videos of traffic prepared by the AHTD. Some information was missing.
  • People at Tuesday's open house study videos of traffic prepared by the AHTD. Some information was missing.

The 3D videos prepared by the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department to allow viewers to compare the 8-lane options for Interstate 30 to the 10-lane options (called 6+4 for various reasons by the AHTD, one of them possibly to get around the requirement to get Metroplan to amend its 6-lane limit on I-30) show such a dramatic difference — with traffic at a near standstill with 8 lanes and moving quickly with plenty of room between cars on the 10-lane — that I called the highway department's design build project engineer, Ben Browning, and asked why.

Browning explained at the public hearing on Tuesday night that it was because the collector/distributor lanes that make up the four lanes of the 10 lane plan are removing 80 percent of the traffic off the interstate's thru traffic. He also said the models used in creating the videos, which compare traffic at the evening rush hour in 2041, took into account induced demand — that more people will choose to use I-30 because, at first, it won't have congestion, though given what the 8-lane video shows and the fact that there are alternatives to cross the river, I can't imagine anyone choosing I-30 under that scenario.

We don't know how much "induced demand" the AHTD factored into its models. But Browning told me there is another factor making the 2041 traffic in the 6+4 scenario appear to be such smooth sailing: It assumes that Interstate 30 south of its interchange with I-530 and I-440 will be widened all the way to 65th Street, I-30 becoming three lanes rather that the current two at that conjunction.

That stretch of interstate is not part of the 30 Crossing project; 30 Crossing stops at 530 and 440. Widening of I-30 from there to 65th Street is unfunded. But the widening of I-30 to 65th Street — included in both 8- and 10-lane models — was included because "there is a likelihood that widening could happen in the future," Browning said, and that such widening could be recommended by AHTD next year. On the other hand, the AHTD took out the widening of I-630 to University as an assumption because it was not likely to be funded. 

What if that widening never occurred? Browning said that southbound traffic on I-30, even with the 10-lane alternative, would be "significant." 

It seems to me the videos should have included information on all the traffic data assumed for them.

The AHTD 30 Crossing website also includes an image called the "8-lane general purpose backup," showing that only two northbound lanes connect with I-40 traffic under that scenario rather than three lanes under 10-lane plan.  

So what would happen if rather than two lanes, a third lane for northbound traffic onto I-40 were added? "You're getting away from the 8-lane mentality at that point," Browning said. The AHTD didn't model it to know whether that would make a difference in the bumper-t0-bumper traffic under the 8-lane scenario.

At any rate, if the AHTD is to assume I-30 will be widened from 440 and 530 to 65th Street, what happens west of 65th Street? Or is that assumed as well? And if I-30 is widened all the way to Benton, will that put pressure on Interstate 430? And if it does — well, you see the logic here. Pushing bottlenecks down the road might make for a nice video of swift rush hour traffic in Little Rock, but what does it do elsewhere? 

PS — As we wrote yesterday, the powers-that-be have agreed to go in the tank on the latest iteration of the 10-lane-plus concrete chasm through the heart of Little Rock. Any time the establishment has cut a deal, you can expect the Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce to be in their orchestrating the string-pulling. No different today.  They naturally join the Big Lie PR strategy of the Freeway Department in calling it a six-lane freeway with four lanes of collectors. Even in Arkansas that adds up to 10, and as noted, sometimes more.

Tags: , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (10)

Showing 1-10 of 10

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-10 of 10

Add a comment

More by Leslie Newell Peacock

  • No Red Cross number on the wall? For shame, Planned Parenthood

    It would be interesting to know why Arkansas Department of Health inspectors have, for the first time, been concerned whether there is a Red Cross phone number posted in clinics that provide abortion services.
    • Dec 14, 2017
  • No more net neutrality: FCC votes along party lines in favor of telecom companies

    As expected, the FCC today voted along party lines 3-2 to dump net neutrality and allow broadband providers to block or slow upload of websites and charge for certain content and high-quality delivery.
    • Dec 14, 2017
  • Tech Park 2.0: Architects present for next phase

    The three finalists in the Little Rock Technology Park's search for an architect to design the next phase of park development — a six-story, 100,000-square-foot building on the empty lot between the park, at 417 Main St., and the KATV, Channel 7, building at 401 Main — presented to the board this afternoon.
    • Dec 13, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • IHOP coming down, but .....

    I always scan the Little Rock City Board for items of interest this week and this one caught my eye: A zoning measure required by a proposal to tear down the IHOP at Markham and University.
    • Apr 30, 2016
  • Campus gun bill clears committee

    The so-called compromise amendment that will allow anyone 25 or older with a training certificate carry a concealed weapon on public college campuses was approved in a Senate committee this afternoon.
    • Feb 21, 2017
  • Kenneth Starr: A comment from Betsey Wright

    Betsey Wright, former President Bill Clinton's chief of staff when he was Arkansas governor, responds bitterly to a New York Times article today quoting Whitewater Prosecutor Kenneth Starr's warm words about Clinton. She can't forget the lives Starr ruined in Arkansas.
    • May 24, 2016

Most Shared

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Campus carry rules approved

    • There's not much of a way to "prevent" these sorts of events in our society…

    • on December 17, 2017
  • Re: Campus carry rules approved

    • doigotta Not a surprise that you might identify with bigoted cultural profiling. That superior position…

    • on December 17, 2017
  • Re: Campus carry rules approved

    • baked needs a ladder for some of these posts since it's over his head anyway…

    • on December 17, 2017

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation