Arkansas Health Department blasts medical marijuana | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Arkansas Health Department blasts medical marijuana

Posted By on Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:22 PM

It's unsurprising that an agency under the control of Republican Gov. Asa Hutchinson has come out against legalization of medical marijuana. But the Arkansas Health Department has done so. It has issued this statement:

pot.jpg
click to enlarge ON THE BALLOT: This proposal has qualified for a November vote. A second proposal is being reviewed by the secretary of state. A vote for either is a vote for relief for many people who've found marijuana useful.
  • ON THE BALLOT: This proposal has qualified for a November vote. A second proposal is being reviewed by the secretary of state. A vote for either is a vote for relief for many people who've found marijuana useful.
I don't like that a state-funded agency is using state-funded employees to get involved in a political campaign. But we went down this road in 2014 when Human Services was the outspoken opponent of medical marijuana. The law prohibiting such activities by state employees in behalf of partisan candidates specifically exempts use of public materials in ballot issue campaigns. Other laws, as an analysis done two years ago indicates, also aim at activity for candidates, not ballot issues.

Still, the Health Department has made some broad assertions about the efficacy of medical marijuana that its adherents will vigorously dispute.

Science is of only modest relevance to me. The anecdotal testimony of sick people on the benefits of pot is good enough for me, along with the continuing futility of the state's war on drugs. For once, I guess, a state agency is at least not oppressing gay people or women's medical rights, though Health Department officials have been accomplices in those efforts, too.

A Health Department spokesman, Meg Mirivel, responded to my question about the department's political activity:

This ballot measure names ADH as the regulatory agency, so we have an obvious stake in it. We have gotten many questions about our position, and have noticed misinformation circulating about our position, so we are clarifying what our position is. This is not the first time ADH has articulated this position on medical marijuana.

Tags: , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (34)

Showing 1-34 of 34

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-34 of 34

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Judge Griffen: Why black lives matter

    Another few words from Judge Wendell Griffen growing from the controversy over the sale of Black Lives Matter T-shirts at the state black history museum — removed by the administration and restored after protests from Griffen and others stirred by a story in the Arkansas Times:
    • Mar 13, 2016
  • Women's March planned in Arkansas to mark Trump inauguration

    Speaking of Donald Trump and in answer to a reader's question: There will be a women's march in Arkansas on Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, as well as the national march planned in Washington.
    • Dec 30, 2016
  • Judge anticipates punishment of lawyers in Fort Smith class action case

    Federal Judge P.K. Holmes of Fort Smith issued a 32-page ruling yesterday indicating he contemplates punishment of 16 lawyers who moved a class action lawsuit against an insurance company out of his court to a state court in Polk County after a settlement had been worked out.
    • Apr 15, 2016

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation