I wrote Sunday
about the Little Rock City Board’s push to talk to congressmen, including recalcitrant local U.S. Rep. French Hill, on pushing for a federal law to encourage collection of local sales taxes on Internet sales.

I also wrote that some states, most recently Louisiana, had passed state laws that had prompted Amazon, the major online retailer, to begin collecting and remitting state and local sales taxes. Sen. Jake Files of Fort Smith, a Republican, has said he intends to introduce similar legislation in Arkansas today. It would be a boon to local and state governments, maybe $100 million worth. The idea will be fought as a new tax when it only guarantees collection of a use tax already authorized but not collected and not voluntarily remitted by online customers.

Advertisement

Further reporting on this topic this morning in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette sent me to state tax records because of the moaning about the Internet’s impact on the city. When Little Rock passed a sales tax increase in 2011, it expected a 2 percent annual growth in the revenue. It hasn’t come close, with a rise of only .5 percent expected for 2016. Mayor Mark Stodola and City Director Dean Kumpuris want to blame the shortfall — which is pinching all areas of city government — on the loss of commerce to the Internet.

Make no mistake, Internet commerce is punishing not just sales tax collections but also local merchants. But I don’t happen to think it’s the full story in Little Rock. For some anecdotal idea of what I mean, let’s look at a year-to-year collection of sales taxes for the most recent two full years available, 2014 and 2015. They are compiled by the state Finance and Administration Department, which serves as collector of all sales taxes and then redistributes the money to the various entities. Increase in local tax revenue from year to year, 2014 and 2015, when Little Rock tax income rose 3.9 percent:

Advertisement

Bentonville 16.4%
Rogers 6%
Conway 2.6%
Cabot 4.4%
Bryant  9.5%
Benton 23.4% (it increased its sales tax in April 2014)
Fayetteville 9.7%
Springdale 8.7%

(Figures for all of 2016 are not yet available.)

Is the Internet Little Rock’s only problem? Why have other cities done so much better? Might a general lack of growth and loss of commerce to growing suburbs with expanding major retailers also contribute? I’ve argued that for years.

Advertisement

I’ve also argued broader growth issues should be considered when city officials neglect or, worse, tear down the local public schools and drive people elsewhere. I’ve said the same when city officials enthusiastically get behind plans to move commuters home to the suburbs faster (and further damage the city with wider freeways), so they’ll have more time to shop in their local shopping centers.

City Director Kumpuris says the city is in crisis. Indeed, but the Internet is not the only maker of it. We are helping our own demise. They have the web in Bentonville, Bryant, Fayetteville and Springdale, too.

Advertisement

Be a part of something bigger

As a reader of the Arkansas Times, you know we’re dedicated to bringing you tough, determined, and feisty journalism that holds the powerful accountable. For 50 years, we've been fighting the good fight in Little Rock and beyond – with your support, we can do even more. By becoming a subscriber or donating as little as $1 to our efforts, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be helping us hire more writers to expand our coverage and continue to bring important stories to light. With over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, it's clear that our readers value our great journalism. Join us in the fight for truth.

Previous article Analysis: New landlord-tenant bill seems weighted to landlord Next article Poore, on short notice during work day, to talk about Little Rock school closings