Satanic Temple demands public hearing after legislature moves to block monument effort | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, February 9, 2017

Satanic Temple demands public hearing after legislature moves to block monument effort

Posted By on Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:42 PM

click to enlarge THE DEVIL CAME DOWN TO ARKANSAS: Rapert backs Ten Commandments monument but is more squeamish about other ideas. - BRIAN CHILSON
  • BRIAN CHILSON
  • THE DEVIL CAME DOWN TO ARKANSAS: Rapert backs Ten Commandments monument but is more squeamish about other ideas.

The Satanic Temple today delivered a demand letter to state officials threatening litigation if they are denied a public hearing for their proposed eight-and-half-foot-tall bronze statue of the goat-headed pagan god Baphomet on the grounds of the Arkansas State Capitol.

The letter comes in response to a bill passed 91-0 by the House earlier this week, which would halt consideration of new monuments on the Capitol grounds unless they're first approved by the legislature. The bill, co-sponsored by Rep. Kim Hammer and Sen. Jason Rapert, appeared to be aimed at putting a stop to the Satanic Temple's efforts.

It was Rapert who inspired the Satanists and their mission. The backstory is familiar to readers of this blog: Rapert and other Republicans pushed a law in 2015 decreeing the placement of a Ten Commandments monument on the Capitol Grounds, an apparent violation of the U.S. Constitution. In response, the Satanic Temple requested their own privately funded monument, which they describe as a symbol of religious pluralism. A few weeks ago, a subcommittee of the Capitol Arts and Grounds commission deemed a monument site plan submitted by the Satanic Temple sufficient to move forward to a public comment phase.

While the legislature has already approved the planned Ten Commandments monument, lawmakers have been less gung-ho about ideas from other traditions, such as goat-headed pagan gods. (Of course, this is precisely the Satanic Temple's point: the government seems to be privileging one religion over another, in violation of the law.) In fact, lawmakers are apparently so unhappy about the Temple and its idea for a monument that they are now aiming to block the group from even going  through the normal public process of commission meetings and public comment periods. Hammer's bill would prevent the Capitol Arts and Grounds Commission from beginning the process for new Capitol monuments without approval from lawmakers; currently, the commission may consider monuments and make recommendations but final approval must come from the legislature.

Of course, the Satanic Temple has already begun the approval process with the commission and is set to move to the public comment phase. The Temple argues that even if Hammer's bill passes and is signed into law, it should only be applied to new monument requests, not halt their monument request that is already in process.

In a press release today, the Satanic Temple stated that its attorney "informed Arkansas officials by letter today that the new monument request standards — if approved by the Governor — cannot halt monument requests already in process, as to do so would be to apply the new standards retroactively, and illegally."

From the letter:

To be clear, House Bill 1273, even if made effective immediately, can not be applied ex post facto to The Satanic Temple's monument request, which is already in process. The procedural revision proposed by House Bill 1273 can only be legally applied to any and all monument requests submitted after its passage. The Satanic Temple, having expended significant costs including, but not limited to, travel, lodging, and architectural designs, in pursuance of following pre-existing protocols for private monument donations to the Arkansas State Capitol Grounds, reasonably expect that Arkansas will grant their monument request the public hearing it is due… Retroactive application of proposed Bill 1273 would give rise to numerous legal claims against the State of Arkansas at the expense of the taxpayers.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

More by David Ramsey

Readers also liked…

  • The long and winding road: No exception yet for 30 Crossing

    The Arkansas highway department's representative on the Metroplan board of directors told the board today that the department is requesting an exception to the planning agency's cap on six lanes for its 30 Crossing project to widen Interstate 30 from six to 10 (and more) lanes.
    • Jun 29, 2016
  • Arkansas legislature rejects bipartisan effort to study race relations

    On Friday, the Arkansas Legislative Council soundly rejected a bipartisan effort by two senators to to create a temporary legislative subcommittee to study race relations in the state.
    • Sep 15, 2017
  • Arkansas Times Recommends: A Literary Edition

    Arkansas Times Recommends is a series in which Times staff members (or whoever happens to be around at the time) highlight things we've been enjoying this week.
    • Jul 1, 2016

Most Shared

  • In the margins

    A rediscovered violin concerto brings an oft-forgotten composer into the limelight.
  • Donald Trump is historically unpopular — and not necessarily where you think

    My colleagues John Ray and Jesse Bacon and I estimate, in the first analysis of its kind for the 2018 election season, that the president's waning popularity isn't limited to coastal cities and states. The erosion of his electoral coalition has spread to The Natural State, extending far beyond the college towns and urban centers that voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. From El Dorado to Sherwood, Fayetteville to Hot Springs, the president's approval rating is waning.
  • Arkansans join House vote to gut Americans with Disabilities Act

    Despite fierce protests from disabled people, the U.S. House voted today, mostly on party lines, to make it harder to sue businesses for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act. Of course Arkansas congressmen were on the wrong side.

Most Recent Comments

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation