Trumpcare: 'What were they thinking' | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Trumpcare: 'What were they thinking'

Posted By on Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:56 AM

That's columnist Paul Krugman's question on the House Trumpcare plan in light of the devastating report by the Congressional Budget Office that it would eventually cost 24 million people their insurance coverage.

Still, he says, don't be so sure it won't become law.

Now my questions: First, can this legislation still go through? I have learned never to underestimate the cravenness of Republican “moderates,” who may posture to the center but almost always cave to the hard right when it matters. But even so, it’s hard to imagine this act of cruelty getting 50 senators. And if it can’t pass the Senate, won’t right-wing purists in the House decide to advertise their purity by voting against a bill that still falls short of free-market ideals rather than vote for Obamacare 0.5?

Second, what were Republican leaders thinking? Something like this C.B.O. score was a foregone conclusion; would it really have mattered much if it were 15 million losing insurance, not 24 million? How was this supposed to work out politically?
Perhaps for a clue we can look to U.S. Rep. Bruce Westerman. He Tweeted:


When I suggested that "innovation" means less money to cover fewer people, he responded:


Much to be said here and I think it goes to the heart of the difficulties the Republicans created for themselves. You can't do much about outcomes for people without insurance. You don't have much money to spend if you give a whopping tax cut to rich people and end mandated coverage. Smaller outlays to the states (and the block grants WILL be less than Arkansas is now receiving)  — after the private insurance companies manage the money and take their profit out  — seem certain to have an unavoidable "outcome." Many millions fewer people with insurance coverage. If by focusing on outcomes, you mean reading the obituary page, well OK then.

Tags: , , ,


Sign up for the Daily Update email
Favorite

Comments (9)

Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Rutledge opponent hits her socializing with corporate interests

    Mike Lee, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, has criticized Attorney General Leslie Rutledge over recent reports of her participation at private meetings where corporate interests make big contributions to a political group she heads for access to state legal officers.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Arkansas Supreme Court refuses to rehear invalidation of marijuana act

    The Arkansas Supreme Court today denied a request to rehear its decision invalidating Issue 7, the medical marijuana initiated act.
    • Nov 3, 2016
  • ADEQ denies C&H Hog Farm permit

    The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality has denied a new permit for the C&H Hog Farms' concentrated animal feeding operation near Mount Judea (Newton County). This is a big and somewhat surprising victory for critics who have viewed C&H's large-scale pig farm and the pig waste it generates as an existential threat to the Buffalo National River.
    • Jan 10, 2018
  • Women's March planned in Arkansas to mark Trump inauguration

    Speaking of Donald Trump and in answer to a reader's question: There will be a women's march in Arkansas on Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, as well as the national march planned in Washington.
    • Dec 30, 2016

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Slideshows

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation