The House completed action today on Sen. Trent Garner’s SB 522, intended to discourage “mass picketing,” a  piece of legislation similar to many being passed by Republicans lawmakers nationwide to tamp down political demonstrations. The vote was 58-22.

Rep. Bob Ballinger insisted 1st Amendment rights would not be infringed — the bill even says so. What the bill says and what law enforcement officers might do when faced with, for example, an unexpectedly large turnout of protesters that might obstruct what an officer believes is “free use” of a roadway, are two potentially very different things.

Advertisement

Look, too, at Garner’s definition of unlawful obstruction of a private residence.  That could, by definition, include “intimidation communicated near or contiguous to the private residence.” What does THAT mean? What if a thousand or so people gathered a block from Trent Garner’s residence and said they didn’t much like his lawmaking or that of his employer,  U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton? Intimidating? Near? Maybe if you’re not a big fan of robust 1st Amendment speech and assembly.

Invest in the future of great journalism in Arkansas

Join the ranks of the 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts who know that the Arkansas Times is the go-to source for tough, determined, and feisty journalism that holds the powerful accountable. For 50 years, our progressive, alternative newspaper in Little Rock has been on the front lines of the fight for truth, and with your support, we can do even more. By subscribing or donating to the Arkansas Times, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be helping us hire more writers and expand our coverage. Don't miss out on the opportunity to make a difference with your subscription or donation to the Arkansas Times today.

Previous article A further assault on lawmaking by the people Next article Parole board recommends no clemency for death row inmate Marcel Williams