Abortion rights group protests new anti-abortion law | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, March 29, 2017

Abortion rights group protests new anti-abortion law

Posted By on Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:53 PM

An abortion rights group today blasted the latest anti-abortion law signed by Gov. Asa Hutchinson — HB 1434, which nominally prohibits an abortion on grounds of sex of the fetus.

The Center for Reproductive Rights says the bill is  a groundbreaking version of a so-called sex selection abortion bans that forces doctors to investigate a woman's "entire pregnancy history" before she is allowed to have a constitutionally protected health procedure.

Said a release:

The bill would ban abortion until the physician has spent an undefined amount of “time and effort” obtaining her complete medical records, potentially causing an indefinite waiting period. These new measures are an effort to force doctors to police the reasons a patient is seeking abortion care, as the bill also criminalizes health care providers who knowingly perform an abortion sought on the basis of the sex of the fetus.

Governor Hutchinson has already signed three other measures restricting a woman’s access to safe, legal abortion this legislative session, including a ban on a safe, proven method of ending a pregnancy in the second trimester.

“Health care providers should never be forced to investigate patients for the reasons behind their personal, private decisions,” said Lourdes Rivera, Senior Vice President, U.S. Programs at the Center for Reproductive Rights. “When a woman has made the decision to end a pregnancy, she needs high-quality health care, not an interrogation.

“Measures of this kind are fueled by harmful and racist stereotypes about women of color. The Center for Reproductive Rights has serious concerns about an abortion ban that will discourage women from getting the health care they need and unfairly targets communities of color. We vow to stand with Arkansas women until their rights are fully respected and protected.” 

The bill, which takes effect Jan. 1, is described by the Center for Reproductive Rights as the first  to allow such an investigation.

 Like the bills before it, this measure masquerades as an effort to prevent sex discrimination, but is simply another thinly veiled attempt to restrict a woman’s ability to get the health care she needs. In fact, measures of this nature exacerbate discrimination by discouraging women from obtaining reproductive health care, particularly among minority communities that already face substantial barriers to care. Moreover, they target communities of color, particularly Asian Pacific Islander (API) communities, and are fueled by stereotypes and misinformation.

Arkansas actually has one of the poorest track records in the country when it comes to protecting the health of women and their families, with politicians in the state consistently working to restrict a woman’s access to safe, legal abortion. In addition to passing a blatantly unconstitutional abortion ban—which the Supreme Court refused to review in early 2016, thereby ensuring the measure will remain permanently blocked—Arkansas also passed the most anti-choice measures of any state in 2015. 
Perhaps still more lawsuits in the offing. The Supreme Court has, so far, protected abortion rights up to the time of fetal viability. No legislative-created pretexts to curb that right are allowed. Legal experts have doubts about the constitutionality of this latest wrinkle to restrict women's medical autonomy..

Tags: , , ,

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (7)

Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Turkeys rescued in Yellville enjoy their Thanksgiving

    Farm Sanctuary, an animal protection organization, sends word that four turkeys rescued from the Yellville Turkey Trot after the annual drops from buildings and an airplane will enjoy Thanksgiving in friendlier places
    • Nov 23, 2017
  • The New Orleans charter school 'miracle'? It's a ruse

    The New Orleans Tribune has a devastating piece of editorial commentary, based on local reporting and test scores, that lays bare the depiction of the charterization of New Orleans public schools 12 years ago as a miracle of the "reform" movement.
    • Nov 23, 2017
  • More criticism of UA proposal to change tenure policy

    Reason is among the latest to offer critical commentary of a proposal from University of Arkansas System lawyers to change the tenure policy so that a lack of collegiality could be used as a justification for firing a tenured professor.
    • Nov 23, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • IHOP coming down, but .....

    I always scan the Little Rock City Board for items of interest this week and this one caught my eye: A zoning measure required by a proposal to tear down the IHOP at Markham and University.
    • Apr 30, 2016
  • Presidential thriller, co-author Bill Clinton, coming to bookstores in 2018

    June 2018 is the expected publication date for a novel collaboration by former President Bill Clinton and crime writer James Patterson.
    • May 9, 2017
  • LR speakers blast state board for double standard

    A series of speakers, beginning with Sen. Joyce Elliott, denounced what they saw as a hidden agenda favoring charter schools at the state Department of Education and asked the state Board of Education for return of local control.
    • May 12, 2016

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation