Decision on whether hot check court case will proceed coming soon | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, April 13, 2017

Decision on whether hot check court case will proceed coming soon

Posted By on Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:12 PM

click to enlarge DEFENDANTS TURNED PLAINTIFFS: Nakita Lewis (left) and Charles Dade are two of the five plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit filed against the city of Sherwood, Pulaski County and Judge Milas Hale III for operating what the ACLU has called a "debtor's prison." - BRIAN CHILSON
  • Brian Chilson
  • DEFENDANTS TURNED PLAINTIFFS: Nakita Lewis (left) and Charles Dade are two of the five plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit filed against the city of Sherwood, Pulaski County and Judge Milas Hale III for operating what the ACLU has called a "debtor's prison."

Federal Judge James Moody Jr.
said at the conclusion of a hearing Thursday that he would likely decide by early next week whether to dismiss a class action civil rights lawsuit over Sherwood's hot check court, which plaintiffs have described as an unconstitutional debtor's prison.

The ACLU of Arkansas, the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and Morrison and Foerster, an international law firm with 16 offices around the world, filed suit against Pulaski County, the city of Sherwood and Judge Milas "Butch" Hale on behalf of five plaintiffs last August. David Koon wrote a cover story on the lawsuit and Judge Hale's courtroom last year for the Times.

Thursday's hearing came in the wake of a recommendation by federal Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe that the case be dismissed. Volpe said the Younger Abstention Doctrine, established in the 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case Younger v. Harris, made the federal court the wrong jurisdiction for the lawsuit. The doctrine requires federal courts not consider cases where there are ongoing state proceedings.

Plaintiffs attorney Jayson Cohen told Moody that Volpe had misread Younger. Cohen said that none of the plaintiffs had ongoing criminal proceedings at the time the lawsuit was filed. He said that just because a plaintiff owes money doesn't mean there's an ongoing criminal proceeding.

But Mike Mosley, an attorney with the Arkansas Municipal League representing the city of Sherwood and Judge Hale, said the plaintiffs' initial argument in their complaint tied all of the Sherwood court's post-conviction debt collection efforts to additional charges, which all could be appealed. Additionally, Mosley noted that North Little Rock District Court Judge Jim Hamilton had been appointed to serve as judge on the plaintiffs' ongoing cases.

Early in the hearing, Moody asked Cohen, "Assuming you stay in this court, what corrective action are you going to ask me to take?" Moody said he was struggling to imagine any relief for plaintiffs beyond a declaratory judgement. No damages or injunctive relief would be applied in such a judgement.

Cohen said it was too early to say, but a declaratory judgement might be sufficient.

Later, Margaret Depper, representing Pulaski County, said that, though the plaintiffs say they only want future relief, if the court declares the Sherwood court's actions unconstitutional, past convictions could not stand.

Tags: , , ,


Sign up for the Daily Update email
Favorite

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Lindsey Millar

Readers also liked…

  • Women's March planned in Arkansas to mark Trump inauguration

    Speaking of Donald Trump and in answer to a reader's question: There will be a women's march in Arkansas on Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, as well as the national march planned in Washington.
    • Dec 30, 2016
  • Your daily dose of Jason Rapert

    Sen. Jason Rapert really, really didn't like it when a KATV reporter asked him about the hypocrisy of his political arguments.
    • Feb 4, 2017
  • Campus gun bill clears committee

    The so-called compromise amendment that will allow anyone 25 or older with a training certificate carry a concealed weapon on public college campuses was approved in a Senate committee this afternoon.
    • Feb 21, 2017

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Slideshows

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation