UT-Fayetteville? Woo. | Arkansas Blog

Monday, May 1, 2017

UT-Fayetteville? Woo.

Posted By on Mon, May 1, 2017 at 9:41 AM

hookem.jpg

This flyer (a slick card) began popping up around Fayetteville recently. Source unknown to me. It is, of course, a spoof. (And, no, I don't think the students who come to the University of Arkansas from Texas are a bunch of law-flouting louts, certainly no more so than any other college freshmen.)

Still, the flyer is evidence of continuing interest in the percentage of students UA draws from out of state. It is a matter that has arisen in legislative halls from time to time, particularly given tuition breaks extended to out-of-state students  and the fact that in-state Arkansas high school graduates who happen to be in the country without proper citizenship documentation are denied scholarship help.

In the fall of 2016, 52 percent of entering UA freshmen came from out-of-state. Texas accounted for 27 percent of entering freshmen. The national appeal of UA, encouraged by scholarship awards pegged to achievement, is reflected in rising credentials for entering freshman. That enhances the university's stature. But Chancellor Joseph Steinmetz has said there's a limit and he hopes to keep the Arkansas percentage at about half of enrollment.

Still, if you like a little satire, here's what's going around.

hookem2.jpg


Tags: , , , ,


Favorite

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Special master clears minimum wage initiative

    Special Master Sam Bird said today that the proposed minimum wage initiated act had sufficient valid signatures to qualify for the November ballot. The Arkansas Supreme Court will review the decision and make the final call.
    • Sep 24, 2018
  • Monday: Open line and the news

    The open line and today's headlines.
    • Sep 24, 2018
  • Special master finds term limits signatures insufficient

    A special master has concluded that petitions to put a term limits amendment on the November ballot were insufficient because 14,810 signatures shouldn't be counted, mostly for discrepancies in complying with a law that applies to paid canvassers.
    • Sep 24, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Slideshows

Most Recent Comments

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation