Justice Hart blasts use of arbitration to resolve disputes instead of courts | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, June 1, 2017

Justice Hart blasts use of arbitration to resolve disputes instead of courts

Posted By on Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:08 AM

JUSTICE HART: No fan of dispute arbitration.
  • JUSTICE HART: No fan of dispute arbitration.
The Arkansas Supreme Court made no new law today in a decision over a dispute resolved by arbitration, but the case prompted a ringing dissent from Justice Josephine Linker Hart on the apparent preference in law for arbitration over judicial resolution.

Hart's solo dissent, though it had no impact in this or future cases as precedent, said arbitration is "eroding the cornerstone of our democracy — judicial process."

The case was brought by Joshua Kilgore, seeking to overturn an arbitration award and lower court rulings upholding it in a dispute with Robert Mullenax, his former partner in a dental care management company. Kilgore left the company after signing a non-compete and non-disparagement agreement that said any future disputes would go to arbitration. He soon entered a business in Tennessee that competed with Mullenax. Mullenax filed an arbitration claim to enforce the non-compete. Kilgore then complained to the state Insurance Department that Mullenax was engaged in a kickback scheme. The complaint was held to be unfounded. The arbitrator said that Kilgore made the claim to get an edge in defending against the non-compete claim. Mullenax was awarded $7,000 for his own defense expenses plus another $135,000 for attorney fees, expert witness fees and expenses.

Kilgore argued in court that the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction and that his statements to the Insurance Department were protected in the interest of public policy. Both Circuit Judge Chris Piazza and the Court of Appeals disagreed. Today, the Supreme Court upheld their rulings.  It said, in addition to agreeing the arbitrator had jurisdiction, courts "must" uphold an arbitrator unless one of four specific grounds to vacate an award are met, such as corruption or misconduct.  Kilgore did not provide such a justification. The court didn't directly rule on the question of whether Kilgore was due protection from the state whistleblower law, but said this would have been a "thin" argument because the arbitrator had found Kilgore was motivated by self-interest, not public protection.

Justice Hart wrote a separate opinion to criticize the "oppression" of alternative dispute resolution, or arbitration, "inexplicably a favorite of Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court."
She said the Arkansas Supreme Court had echoed that view in "finest ovine fashion."

Hart disputed the notion that arbitration is less expensive and more expedient. It should be viewed as "anathema" by every member of the judiciary, she wrote.

First, the case before us should forever dispel the notion that arbitration is "less expensive." ln this $7,000 case, the petitioner engendered $135,000 in legal fees, which were shifted to the respondent. Under Arkansas law, each side would bear its own fees in a tort case. It should also be noted that the arbitrator the petitioner selected billed at $350 per hour. In circuit court, an entire case would be heard for only the filing fee, currently just over $200.

Second, according to the majority, the arbitrator's decision ... is all but immune from judicial review. ...  While the grounds for overturning an arbitrator's decision are limited, they are present here. In this case, the arbitrator completely ignored the General Assembly's clearly stated public policy favoring whistleblowers. The majority has not justified why it has decided to immunize the arbitrator's decision to ignore Arkansas law; certainly a circuit court does not enjoy the same latitude.

Finally, the results achieved by alternative dispute resolution, whether inexpensive or not, speedy or not, or flexible or not, are not guided by the same ethos as our courts of law, which is the concept of justice. If alternative dispute resolution was not skewed in favor of the powerful, it would not be a fixture of the ubiquitous adhesion contracts that we are confronted with on a daily basis. We are losing one of the cornerstones of our democracy —courts of law. 

She then quoted from Harper Lee's "To Kill a Mockingbird," a passage about courts as the "great leveler" in society, a place where despite faults, all people are created equal.

Hart closed:

Forgoing justice in favor of expediency — for some — is too high a price to pay.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Rutledge opponent hits her socializing with corporate interests

    Mike Lee, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, has criticized Attorney General Leslie Rutledge over recent reports of her participation at private meetings where corporate interests make big contributions to a political group she heads for access to state legal officers.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Trump immigration protest at LR: Quick and fierce

    It was not even 24 hours ago that Sophia Said, director of the Interfaith Center; City Director Kathy Webb and others decided to organize a protest today of Donald Trump's executive order that has left people from Muslim countries languishing in airports or unable to come to the US at all — people with visas, green cards,a  post-doc graduate student en route to Harvard, Google employees abroad, families. I got the message today before noon; others didn't find out until it was going on. But however folks found out, they turned out in huge numbers, more than thousand men, women and children, on the grounds of the state Capitol to listen to speakers from all faiths and many countries.
    • Jan 29, 2017
  • Your daily dose of Jason Rapert

    Sen. Jason Rapert really, really didn't like it when a KATV reporter asked him about the hypocrisy of his political arguments.
    • Feb 4, 2017
  • Campus gun bill clears committee

    The so-called compromise amendment that will allow anyone 25 or older with a training certificate carry a concealed weapon on public college campuses was approved in a Senate committee this afternoon.
    • Feb 21, 2017

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation