Dreaming of university independence on guns | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, June 7, 2017

Dreaming of university independence on guns

Posted By on Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:42 PM

click to enlarge A LEG TO STAND ON? Michigan case raises an argument for Arkansans who oppose guns on campus.
  • A LEG TO STAND ON? Michigan case raises an argument for Arkansans who oppose guns on campus.
The Associated Press reports that a Michigan state appeals court has ruled that the University of Michigan can ban guns on campus despite a state law that prevents local governments from putting limits on guns.

As you know, the Arkansas legislature just opened up most of the state, including state universities, to concealed pistol packers, once they get a new special guns-anywhere concealed carry permit to be issued in a few months. There also remain gun nuts in Arkansas who think open carry just about anywhere is already the law.

What if the University of Arkansas Board of Trustees said Amendment 33 to the Arkansas Constitution is imbued with the power of university independence intended on its adoption in 1942. What if powers invested in the university board could not be "transferred" to the legislature unless an institution is abolished?

Great deference, or effective transfer of power, has been given to the legislature in university matters, mainly appropriations. But what if the university board demanded sovereignty over campus public safety, including on gun toting?

It's a pipe dream to think the UA board (or any lesser state university board) would risk defiance of the legislature on something like guns, I grant you. (Playing Arkansas State is another matter.) But why not assert an argument similar to that upheld in  Michigan? There, the court held:
The university is a “state-level, not a lower level or inferior level, governmental entity. More specifically, it is a constitutional corporation of independent authority,” judges Mark Cavanagh and Deborah Servitto said.
If the University of Arkansas Board DID assert such an argument, would the Arkansas Supreme Court, increasingly deferential to the legislature, dare back the university?

Slow news day. Just day dreaming.

Tags: , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Judge Griffen: Why black lives matter

    Another few words from Judge Wendell Griffen growing from the controversy over the sale of Black Lives Matter T-shirts at the state black history museum — removed by the administration and restored after protests from Griffen and others stirred by a story in the Arkansas Times:
    • Mar 13, 2016
  • The two cities of Little Rock: East/west, black/white

    The Little Rock City Board illustrated this week a community divided over public schools, another blow to the Little Rock School District and another illustration of the need for ward elections to the board.
    • Mar 23, 2017
  • Judge anticipates punishment of lawyers in Fort Smith class action case

    Federal Judge P.K. Holmes of Fort Smith issued a 32-page ruling yesterday indicating he contemplates punishment of 16 lawyers who moved a class action lawsuit against an insurance company out of his court to a state court in Polk County after a settlement had been worked out.
    • Apr 15, 2016

Most Shared

  • Discussion: State killing of the mentally ill

    The Arkansas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and others will have a forum on mental illness and the death penalty at 6:30 p.m. Monday at the Bowen School of Law's Friday Courtroom.

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation