Attorney general rejects amendment for ethics, lawsuit damage limits | Arkansas Blog

Friday, July 14, 2017

Attorney general rejects amendment for ethics, lawsuit damage limits

Posted By on Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:30 PM

click to enlarge SCOTT TROTTER: Attorney general shoots down his constitutional amendment proposal.
  • SCOTT TROTTER: Attorney general shoots down his constitutional amendment proposal.
Attorney General Leslie Rutledge today rejected a proposed constitutional amendment to impose stricter ethics standards in judicial raceS and counter a legislative amendment to severely limit damage lawsuits.

The proposal came from Scott Trotter, the Little Rock lawyer who authored a proposed constitutional amendment recently considered for support by the Arkansas Bar Association House of Delegates. That group fell narrowly short of the 75 percent vote required for official endorsement. That meant the Association itself couldn't throw its weight and membership behind the effort, but Trotter said at the time he intended to continue to pursue the idea and hoped to form an ad hoc committee to push the amendment to the ballot by a volunteer petition-gathering process.

But first the attorney general must approve the form of a ballot proposal. And Rutledge said what Trotter proposed had ambiguities and was misleading.  Trotter proposed to: 1) require disclosure of independent sources of money spent to influence judicial elections; 2) remove legislative authority over Ethics Commission rules; 3) require a two-thirds vote, rather than simple majority, for gubernatorial vetoes; 4) limit the legislature's ability to set court rules; 5) preserve the right to sue for damages without a legislative limit on damage awards or attorney fees. The legislature wants to strip the Supreme Court of rule-making authority and set severe limits on damage awards and attorney fees in such cases.

Rutledge said the popular name was misleading for Trotter to write that juries had the right to set damages now, because judges have some ability to alter jury awards. She said further it was misleading for Trotter to say his amendment would require election disclosures, because some disclosure is already required. And she said a political connotation could be found in writing that the amendment placed "limits" on the legislature.

Rutledge's opinion delved more deeply into her perception of shortcomings in virtually all of Trotter's specific proposals, so many that she said she was unable to suggest corrective language.

The odds of Rutledge approving an amendment for the ballot that contravenes the desires of the Republican majority legislature and limits its recently expanded powers in any way seem long from here.

Tags: , , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (8)

Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Auditor Lea caught not telling the truth

    State Auditor Andrea Lea, who began her tenure in statewide office with a degree of competence unseen in some other Republican counterparts (think Treasurer Dennis Milligan particularly), is becoming more deeply mired in a political scandal.
    • Mar 4, 2016
  • 'Million-Dollar Thursday': A visit to Sherwood's hot check court

    We take a visit to the weekly hot check court in Sherwood District Court, the subject of a recent civil rights lawsuit filed by ACLU Arkansas and others, who say the system there results in a modern-day debtor's prison
    • Aug 25, 2016
  • French Hill votes against disaster aid to Puerto Rico

    Republican U.S. Rep. French Hill alone among Arkansas's House delegation voted last week against a measure that provided $36.5 billion in disaster aid, a portion  for hurricane-ravaged Puerto Rico as well as money for wildfire response and to support the flood insurance program.
    • Oct 14, 2017

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation