Study: States that would restrict abortion do poorly to support women's health | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

Study: States that would restrict abortion do poorly to support women's health

Posted By on Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:05 PM

click to enlarge screen_shot_2017-08-01_at_11.50.20_am.png

It's entirely unsurprising that Arkansas, where lawmakers passed a law that said to women, yes, you can have an abortion after 12 weeks, you just can't have a safe one, that a report from the Center for Reproductive Rights and Ibis Reproductive Health finds a correlation between the number of abortion restrictions and policies that limit services for women and families and produce produce bad health outcomes for them.

The report, "Evaluating Priorities: Measuring Women's and Children’s Health and Well-being against Abortion Restrictions in the States, Volume II," concludes that "In general, states that have passed multiple abortion restrictions have passed fewer evidence-based policies to support women’s and children’s well-being, compared to states with fewer restrictions on abortion."

What are supportive polices? The study identified 24 attainable goals, among them expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, no-wait enrollment of children in CHIP (Children's Health Insurance Program), full-day kindergarten, expanded family/medical leave, domestic violence training for health care providers, firearm safety laws to protect children, sex education, etc.

Arkansas, which has passed 13 restrictions on abortion (the highest number is 14), fulfills nine of the 24 supportive policies, placing it in the bottom 15 states. It was one of only two states that met none — zero — of the women's health benchmarks.

From Nancy Northrup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights:
“This report makes clear that politicians in states with the most extreme record of attacking reproductive rights are also far less likely to support the kind of programs and policies that actually advance the health and well-being of families.”

“As a result, women and children in Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas and other states with the harshest abortion restriction also suffer some of the nation’s worst health outcomes.

“What women, children and their families need their elected officials to focus on is increasing access to affordable healthcare, including Medicaid, so women can have prenatal care, cervical cancer screenings, and fewer preterm births. They should invest in healthy kids, who have good nutrition and physical education. This report clearly lays out that politicians pushing extreme anti-choice laws at the expense of public health have their priorities exactly backwards.”
The state legislature says their laws — like requiring rapist consent to an abortion, the demand that every obstetrical record be gathered before an abortion can occur, the demand that a 16-year-old report a pregnancy as a crime even if it was the result of consenting sex — are meant to protect women. Ha. The cynicism and blatant misogyny of the Arkansas lawmakers who would burden women with these laws is unbelievable. Federal Judge Kristine Baker was not fooled; she enjoined enforcement of the laws last Friday.

The Center for Reproductive Rights and Ibis Reproductive Health noted that "For years, politicians have claimed their motive in passing abortion restrictions was to protect women’s health and safety. The Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt challenged that claim, instead underscoring the importance that real data and women’s lived experiences — and not fake news or false information — should play in reproductive health policy. Today’s report emphasizes that legislators should be taking their cues from data and their constituents’ needs to address the real health concerns in their states, and should stop playing politics with women’s reproductive rights and health. [Our emphasis.]

Find helpful infographics here.

Tags: , , , ,


Sign up for the Daily Update email
Favorite

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

More by Leslie Newell Peacock

  • Satia Spencer & Friends at Wildwood

    Elephantom at Stickyz and other things to do.
    • Jul 19, 2018
  • A deeper dive into a wider 30

    A look at ARDOT's environmental report.
    • Jul 18, 2018
  • UAMS restarts cardiac surgery program

    The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, which had to suspend its cardiac surgical care in May when its heart surgeon, Dr. Gareth Tobler, retired before a new hire had been made, has resumed its program.
    • Jul 13, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Former Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel applauds Trump's EPA choice of climate change denier Scott Pruitt

    Dustin McDaniel gives the thumbs up to a man set to dismantle EPA regulations.
    • Dec 8, 2016
  • Antwan Phillips wants to make a difference in reducing Little Rock violence

    KARK/Fox 16's push to do something about Little Rock violence includes a spotlight on people trying to make a difference — in this episode Antwan Phillips, a lawyer at Wright, Lindsey and Jennings.
    • Aug 30, 2017
  • Trump immigration protest at LR: Quick and fierce

    It was not even 24 hours ago that Sophia Said, director of the Interfaith Center; City Director Kathy Webb and others decided to organize a protest today of Donald Trump's executive order that has left people from Muslim countries languishing in airports or unable to come to the US at all — people with visas, green cards,a  post-doc graduate student en route to Harvard, Google employees abroad, families. I got the message today before noon; others didn't find out until it was going on. But however folks found out, they turned out in huge numbers, more than thousand men, women and children, on the grounds of the state Capitol to listen to speakers from all faiths and many countries.
    • Jan 29, 2017

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Slideshows

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation