Supreme Court rejects rule to make ballot challenges easier | Arkansas Blog

Friday, August 4, 2017

Supreme Court rejects rule to make ballot challenges easier

Posted By on Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:52 AM

click to enlarge SCOTT TROTTER: Loses bid before Supreme Court to make it easier for voters to challenge ballot issues referred by the legislature.
  • SCOTT TROTTER: Loses bid before Supreme Court to make it easier for voters to challenge ballot issues referred by the legislature.
The Supreme Court has rejected a rule change proposed by lawyer Scott Trotter that would  have made it easier to challenge legislatively-referred constitutional amendments to the ballot, the AP reports.

AP reporter Andrew DeMillo writes that "Trotter’s proposal also would have required justices to consider whether a legislatively referred proposal is intelligible, honest and impartial, which is the standard used for those initiated by voters. He said the court currently uses a much narrower standard: Whether the legislatively referred proposal is a “manifest fraud” on the public."

Trotter is opposed to an amendment placed on the 2018 ballot to limit damages awarded in civil lawsuits, cap attorneys fees and that would give lawmakers the power to write court rules.
The amendment caps damages — both punitive and for pain and suffering — at $500,000 and limits attorney fees to one-third of net damage awards. Opponents say it restricts the right to a trial by jury, sets a low value on lives of children and the elderly, who can't demonstrate economic damages, and encourages neglectful and abusive nursing homes, among others, because the risk of lawsuit is so diminished.

Challenges of ballot measures initiated by voters — a process the legislature has made more difficult — can be heard directly by the state's high court, but measures referred by the legislature must start first in lower courts.

Trotter's proposed constitutional amendment to counter the legislative amendment was rejected in July by Attorney General Leslie Rutledge.

Trotter took on the fight after a vote on a similar proposal failed to win enough votes in the state Bar Association House of Delegates.

Tags: , , ,


Favorite

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

More by Leslie Newell Peacock

Readers also liked…

Slideshows

Most Viewed

  • Marijuana makes Harding University grad a billionaire

    Meet a new Arkansas-native billionaire — Michael Blue, who grew up in Searcy and graduated from Harding University. He owes his wealth to marijuana.
  • Are the Razorbacks out of their league?

    Ouch. The Southeastern Conference football schedule hasn't yet begun and the New York Times offers an article suggesting the Arkansas Razorbacks aren't up to playing in the league.
  • French Hill carefully vetting crowd for Mike Pence visit

    Mike Pence will appear at a campaign rally for Republican U.S. Rep. French Hill today in Little Rock and the campaign is monitoring carefully who'll be allowed to attend or cover the event. Hill is running a hide-and-seek campaign, making himself available only in safe settings. Maybe 1,200 of the right sort of people will atternd.
  • Demonstrators, small crowd greet Mike Pence at French Hill rally

    Demonstrators have been allowed near the front door of the Statehouse Convention Center where carefully screened guests, not many, will be enjoying Mike Pence's endorsement of Republican Rep. French Hill. Plenty of security and I think it might be more fun outside.
  • Six Supreme Court justices found to have violated ethics code

    The Arkansas Judicial and Disability Commission has announced the filing of formal charges of ethics violations against six members of the Arkansas Supreme Court for their handling of a case involving Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen.

Most Recent Comments

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation