Arkansas group knocks GOP tax bills effort for families | Arkansas Blog

Saturday, November 11, 2017

Arkansas group knocks GOP tax bills effort for families

Posted By on Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:27 AM

click to enlarge aacf-logo-sticky-20170419.png
Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, a progressive lobby, isn't impressed by the increased child credit included in proposed Republican tax legislation. Both Senate and House bills raise the credit from $1,000 to $1,600.

Like the rest of the legislation, this provision is better for higher-income families than others, the group says. It explains:

This is a huge missed opportunity to help our working families.

First, the House proposal. It would increase the credit from $1,000 to $1,600. According to a new analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, it would leave out or give only partial benefits to 46 percent of children in working families. About 20 percent, or 120,000 Arkansas children in working families, would be completely excluded from the change. Another 26 percent, or 153,000 Arkansas children in working families, would receive less than the full value of the $600 increase proposed in the credit under the House bill.

Currently, the Child Tax Credit is only “partially refundable,” which means that families with incomes too low to owe federal income tax only partially benefit from it. The refundable part of the credit is currently limited to 15 percent of a family’s income over $3,000 (no refundability for incomes less than $3,000). Because of the credit’s slow phase-in, families with two children do not receive the full $1,000 credit until their income reaches $16,333. The poorest children in working families qualify for only a small credit, or none at all.

The House proposal to increase the maximum would do nothing to make the credit more available for low-income working families (it still would be limited to 15 percent of earnings over $3,000). In other cases, low income families would receive just a partial bump up in the credit. However, the House proposal would increase the income level at which the credit phases out, thus making more higher income families eligible to take advantage of it. Under current tax law, a married couple with two children and income above $150,000 aren’t eligible for the Child Tax Credit. But in this proposal, couples with two kids who make between $150,000 and $294,000 would be eligible for the credit for the first time.

It’s not a bad idea to make more families eligible for the Child Tax Credit, but it is bad policy to fully extend it to higher-income people without making it available to more lower-income families at the same time.

The Advocate statement lists other problems, particularly the increased restrictions on help for the poor with increased benefits for the well-off. Example from the House bill, with similar changes in the Senate version:

* A single mother with two kids earning just $14,500 would be completely left under the House proposal and receive no increase in her credit.

* A married couple with two kids earning $24,000 would only receive a $100 increase in the credit per child (a total increase of $200).

* A married couple with two kids earning $200,000 would be newly eligible and would now receive a $3,200 credit for the first time.
In short, the tax bill afflicts the afflicted and comforts the comfortable.

Tags: , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • The assault weapon open line

    The open line. And report of the arrest of a man with an AR-15 who threatened to shoot people at a Springdale business.
    • Feb 17, 2018
  • A primary challenger for Rep. Laurie Rushing

    Blue Hog Report has some news on a Republican primary challenge of an incumbent legislator, Rep. Laurie Rushing, by Ernie Hinz of Hot Springs.
    • Feb 17, 2018
  • A common-sense gun measure draws no sponsors from Arkansas

    Republicans, including at least one from Arkansas, are talking about repealing the Dickey Amendment which prohibits gun research from a public health perspective. But none of them are yet willing to DO anything about it.
    • Feb 17, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

  • A mayor stands up against freeway widening. No. Not in Little Rock.

    Another booming city, Indianapolis, fights ever wider urban freeways. Meanwhile, back in Little Rock .....
  • In the margins

    A rediscovered violin concerto brings an oft-forgotten composer into the limelight.
  • Donald Trump is historically unpopular — and not necessarily where you think

    My colleagues John Ray and Jesse Bacon and I estimate, in the first analysis of its kind for the 2018 election season, that the president's waning popularity isn't limited to coastal cities and states. The erosion of his electoral coalition has spread to The Natural State, extending far beyond the college towns and urban centers that voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. From El Dorado to Sherwood, Fayetteville to Hot Springs, the president's approval rating is waning.
  • Arkansans join House vote to gut Americans with Disabilities Act

    Despite fierce protests from disabled people, the U.S. House voted today, mostly on party lines, to make it harder to sue businesses for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act. Of course Arkansas congressmen were on the wrong side.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: The assault weapon open line

    • "Americans Mark Second Straight President's Day Without One."--Andy Borowitz "It is unfair that Trump has…

    • on February 17, 2018
  • Re: A common-sense gun measure draws no sponsors from Arkansas

    • If mental health problems were slaughtering everyone other countries would have the same problem but…

    • on February 17, 2018
  • Re: An open line to end the week

    • Mag--if you copied your post from and earlier thread, it doesn't contain the full link…

    • on February 17, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation