New report on ill consequences of charter schools | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

New report on ill consequences of charter schools

Posted By on Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 7:45 AM

click to enlarge screen_shot_2017-11-21_at_7.41.52_am.png
A new report by the Network for Public Education challenges the talking points for the charter school movement and details ways they can be damaging to children and real public schools.

Charter schools are publicly funded quasi-private schools, typically operated by opaque private corporations whose foundational records are not open to public inspection. They aren't accountable to voters. States have a spotty record of holding them accountable. Arkansas, for example, has often forgiven shortcomings, most recently in forgiving a raft of accounting problems by a "virtual" charter school. Meanwhile, the state refuses to give up control of the Little Rock School District for low test scores at a couple of its 48 schools. It's a district buffeted by leaching of higher achieving students to proliferating charter schools established where no demonstrable need existed.

As Diane Ravitch writes in heralding the new report:

The first law authorizing charter schools was authorized by Minnesota in 1991, and the first charter school opened in St. Paul in 1992. The original idea of charters was that they would enroll students with high-needs, would try new approaches, and would share what they learned with the public schools. They were not intended to be competitors with public schools, but to be akin to research and development centers, abetting the work of the public schools.

Now, 25 years later, the charter sector has burgeoned into nearly 7,000 schools enrolling some three million students. Some charters are corporate chains. Some are religious in character. Some operate for profit. Some are owned and run by non-educators.

Instead of collaborating with public schools, most compete for students and resources. Instead of serving the neediest students, many choose the students who are likeliest to succeed.

It is time for a thorough inquiry into the status and condition of charter schools today, and that is what Carol Burris, executive director of the Network for Public Education, has done in this report.

An experienced high school principal, Burris has traveled the country, visiting charter schools and talking to parents, teachers, students, and administrators.

Not only has she examined many charters, she reviews the marketing of charters and their fiscal impact on traditional public schools. Policy makers have not expanded the funding at the state or local level to pay for new charters. Instead, they have cut funding for the public schools that typically enroll 85-90% of students. Thus, most students will have larger classes and fewer curriculum choices because of the funding taken away for charter schools. Burris also analyzes the report on charters by the NAACP and the response to it by charter advocates.

This is neither fair nor just nor wise.

Here's the full report.

And, as the blogger Curmudgucation notes, this report isn't a policy statement, though he acknowledges that NPE has a negative point of view on the charter movement. It is compilation of 11 specific investigations over the course of a year. The findings range from dubious schools to financial shenanigans and the enduring problem of a lack of equal accountability for the same outlay of dollars that public schools receive from states.

Tags: , , , , ,

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Huckstering in the desert; a payday in Qatar

    The Huckster mines some Qatari gold.
    • Jun 19, 2018
  • Marijuana applications need a recount

    More evidence emerged today for the overwhelming case that the state Medical Marijuana Commission must rescore the applications to cultivate cannabis, preferably using an independent contractor such as a national accounting firm.
    • Jun 19, 2018
  • Casino amendment starts (misleading) advertising

    Driving Arkansas Forward launched its first campaign advertisement today, encouraging Arkansas voters to make sure they can cast their ballots Nov. 6 for a measure that will spur economic growth and create jobs.
    • Jun 19, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Women's March planned in Arkansas to mark Trump inauguration

    Speaking of Donald Trump and in answer to a reader's question: There will be a women's march in Arkansas on Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, as well as the national march planned in Washington.
    • Dec 30, 2016
  • Trump administration approves Medicaid waiver for Kentucky, including work requirements

    The Trump administration today approved Kentucky's request for a waiver of Medicaid rules to implement certain changes to its Medicaid expansion program, including work requirements. Next up, Arkansas?
    • Jan 12, 2018
  • Trump immigration protest at LR: Quick and fierce

    It was not even 24 hours ago that Sophia Said, director of the Interfaith Center; City Director Kathy Webb and others decided to organize a protest today of Donald Trump's executive order that has left people from Muslim countries languishing in airports or unable to come to the US at all — people with visas, green cards,a  post-doc graduate student en route to Harvard, Google employees abroad, families. I got the message today before noon; others didn't find out until it was going on. But however folks found out, they turned out in huge numbers, more than thousand men, women and children, on the grounds of the state Capitol to listen to speakers from all faiths and many countries.
    • Jan 29, 2017

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation