NY Times defends its interview with Donald Trump | Arkansas Blog

Saturday, December 30, 2017

NY Times defends its interview with Donald Trump

Posted By on Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:32 AM

click to enlarge UNFILTERED: When Trump talks, whether to Coast Guard members who joined him for golf or to a New York Times repirter who got a sit-down with him at lunch the practice is to listen, not question. - NEW YORK TIMES
  • New York Times
  • UNFILTERED: When Trump talks, whether to Coast Guard members who joined him for golf or to a New York Times repirter who got a sit-down with him at lunch the practice is to listen, not question.

The New York Times' Michael Schmidt got a rare one-on-one interview with Donald Trump Thursday at his resort in Florida.

How? Well Schmidt was taken to lunch at the Trump National Golf Course grill by Trump insider (and Whitewater conspiracy loony) Chris Ruddy, who regularly defends Trump on TV. Ruddy brought Schmidt over to Trump's neighboring table and they were soon off and running.

The interview has been widely disseminated and discussed, for Trump's incoherency and bragging. But the interview has also been criticized for Schmidt's decision to act primarily as a transcriptionist and not ask followup questions.

The Washington Post jumped on the transcript and compiled a list of 24 Trump false or misleading statements.

Long after the interview, but not in the account of the interview itself, the Time got around to pointing out 10 falsehoods.

Schmidt details how the interview came to be today.  He explains his approach.

During our conversation in July, I learned the challenges this president poses in interviews. He can jump from an issue like the Russia investigation to a policy matter before going off on a tangent about something like his golf game. If you try to interrupt him, he often continues talking. Given this, I employed a strategy in which I asked questions about the most pressing issues of his presidency and then allowed him to talk.

Some readers criticized my approach, saying I should have asked more follow-up questions. I believed it was more important to continue to allow the president to speak and let people make their own judgments about his statements. It was the best way to learn as much as possible about the president’s mind-set and his views on issues like North Korea.
Perhaps. But giving Trump an unchallenged megaphone is of benefit to him. I think the reporter had a duty to challenge him occasionally. As Jamil Smith of the Los Angeles Times put it: "Trump is dictating the means of engagement with the media to a point where the interview loses meaning."

Maggie Haberman, the Times' White House correspondent, huffily defended Schmidt's approach on Twitter. She commented at one point:

Half of Twitter thinks the Schmidt interview was revealing about the POTUS because it was his unfiltered thoughts. The other half is angry that @nytmike did not audition as an extra for the courtroom remake of "A Few Good Men" and interrupt him constantly.
This is straw man logic, as one person commented to Haberman. Schmidt had more options, including a few carefully chosen queries.

I liked what writer Elizabeth Spiers said.

I'm a Times subscriber and think it's a great paper, but in my experience, people inside the Times think it's far more important than people outside of the Times do. And culturally, it creates a sensibility that everything the NYT produces is above reproach. And any criticism is met with hostile dismissal.
Yes indeed.  I remember the hauteur of New York Times people during the great Whitewater snipe hunt, bungled so badly by that newspaper that Gene Lyons wrote a book about it. The newspaper's Clinton animus then continued through the Hillary Clinton candidacy. Michael Schmidt, you might know, was a lead reporter on the overplayed Hillary e-mail story that ultimately provided a key contribution to her defeat.

Would Schmidt have allowed Hillary Clinton to talk uninterrupted or unchallenged had he gotten similar time with her so that people could "make their own judgments"?

Tags: , , , , ,


Comments (17)

Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • One dead, two wounded in early morning shooting

    KARK's Susanne Brunner reports that one person has been killed and two wounded in a shooting shortly after 1 a.m. this morning near Roosevelt Road and Cross Street.
    • Apr 17, 2019
  • Reality bites at Little Rock City Hall; spending must be cut

    A followup to Rebekah Hall's earlier report on Little Rock Mayor Frank Scott Jr.'s announcement that cuts will be necessary in the city budget in part to pay for "priorities," such as his desire to expand the police force, but also to deal with the reality often mentioned here of stagnant to decling city sales tax revenue. Some quick ideas on that:
    • Apr 17, 2019
  • Speaking of hard times in newspapers: Democrat-Gazette's move to digital

    Word continues to filter in of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette's pullback from statewide circulation of a print daily edition of the newspaper — the latest from the Hot Springs area, just 50 or so miles down the road from Little Rock. Subscribers there were told home delivery of a print paper would end in May.
    • Apr 16, 2019
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Recent Comments


© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation