Rutledge rejects first try at casino amendment form | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, January 25, 2018

Rutledge rejects first try at casino amendment form

Posted By on Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:57 PM

Attorney General Leslie Rutledge has rejected the form of a proposed constitutional amendment to allow three casinos in Arkansas and use some of the tax revenue for highways.

The proposal was unveiled earlier this month, with the backing of a lobbyist, a law firm including a former and current legislator and an Indian tribe, though no financial details have been disclosed. The amendment will be hotly opposed by powerful special interests at existing casinos at the two racetracks as well as the religious lobby. Even considering that, the attorney general's office tends to be stingy with quick approval of ballot titles.

Here's the attorney general's opinion. It went to the Driving Arkansas Forward committee. It concerns the popular name, the Arkansas Casino Gaming and Highway Funding Amendment, and the more detailed ballot title.

Said the opinion:

In my opinion, there may be some question whether the words �Highway Funding Amendment� in your proposed popular name fairly represent that feature of the proposed constitutional amendment. I cannot confidently predict whether the Court would say this language in the popular name is fatally misleading. But I believe it may overstate that feature of the measure and expose the popular name to the argument that it tends to mislead voters or give them only the impression the proponents wish to convey.

With regard to your proposed ballot title, it is my opinion, based on the above guidelines established by the Court, that a number of additions or changes are necessary in order to more fully and correctly summarize your proposal. I cannot, however, at this time, fairly or completely summarize the effect of your proposed measure to the electorate in a popular name or ballot title without the resolution of some ambiguities in the text of the measure itself. And thus I cannot determine precisely what changes to the ballot title are necessary to fully and correctly summarize your proposal. It is therefore not appropriate, in my opinion, for me to try to substitute and certify a more suitable and correct popular name and ballot title pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. � 7-9-107(b).  

Tags: , , , ,


Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Little Rock school activists announce events for 60th anniversary of Central High crisis

    The group is not affiliated with the official "Reflections of Progress" commemoration of the 60th anniversary. However, at least two of the Little Rock Nine may be joining the group for an event at 2:30 p.m. at the state Capitol in the Old Supreme Court Chamber.
    • Sep 14, 2017
  • Trump tariffs hit farmers hard

    Well, the trade war has begun and the early returns for farmers are not good — sharp reductions in the prices for soybeans and corn. You may have heard that Arkansas, which overwhelmingly supported Donald Trump, has some agricultural interests, particularly in soybeans.
    • Jul 6, 2018
  • Arkansas legislature rejects bipartisan effort to study race relations

    On Friday, the Arkansas Legislative Council soundly rejected a bipartisan effort by two senators to to create a temporary legislative subcommittee to study race relations in the state.
    • Sep 15, 2017

Most Recent Comments


© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation