Russian collusion is all about Trump. And a question for French HIll | Arkansas Blog

Sunday, August 12, 2018

Russian collusion is all about Trump. And a question for French HIll

Posted By on Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 8:35 AM

click to enlarge CHOOSING SIDES: Today's question: When French Hill was supplied information by Russians, did he tell the FBI or Republican campaigners? And what exactly was contained in that document.
  • CHOOSING SIDES: Today's question: When French Hill was supplied information by Russians, did he tell the FBI or Republican campaigners? And what exactly was contained in that document.

The Washington Post has a useful editoria
l explaining Donald Trump's faulty effort to turn attention from his campaign's Russian collusion to Hillary Clinton, an explanation that again presents questions for Republican 2nd District Congressman French HIll.

Here is what the Trump team did: Senior campaign officials, including then-chairman Paul Manafort, Donald Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner, met in June 2016 with Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Kremlin-connected lawyer. They were told the lawyer could give them “very high level and sensitive information” on Ms. Clinton, as “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”

Here is what the Clinton campaign did: It employed a U.S. law firm that hired a U.S. research outfit that brought in Christopher Steele, a British ex-spy, to gather information on Mr. Trump from his network of sources. That network included Russians.

For all of Mr. Trump’s efforts to muddy the waters, the two cases are decidedly different. There is no evidence of any direct meetings or even tenuous connections between Ms. Clinton’s senior staff and Russian operatives. When the information he was gathering on Mr. Trump seemed alarming, Mr. Steele informed the Federal Bureau of Investigation about his concerns. When the Russian government offered dirt on Mr. Trump’s opponent, his campaign didn’t alert authorities about this sketchy behavior. It eagerly took the meeting.

Mr. Trump’s whataboutism obscures the fundamental difference between engaging in opposition research that includes contacting foreign sources and lapping up information peddled by a foreign government.
Which brings us, again, to French Hill. He met, in Russia, with Natalia Veselnitskaya. He was given a document that news accounts have said was virtually the same as that given to Trump campaign representatives in a meeting in Trump Tower. Did French Hill call the FBI? Or did he provide that document to the Trump campaign? What, precisely, was in that document? This is another question French HIll has dodged. The next time one of the softballers to whom he regularly offers access sitdown with him, perhaps they could press him on the point. Would he rather be Russian than a Democrat?

Tags: , , ,


Favorite

Comments (9)

Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Also on the legislative agenda: Implanted microchips

    Also in the bill hopper today, legislation by Rep. Stephen Meeks to prohibit employers from implanting microchips in employees without their written consent and prohibiting making implantation of a chip a condition of employment.
    • Jan 16, 2019
  • The legislative shop of horrors: Kim Hammer's campus speech bill

    The latest in the parade of horrors in legislative bill filing is a proposal by Sen. Kim Hammer that purports to protect free speech on campus. Its point is to usurp control of campuses as a reaction to the widespread, but not particularly well-supported belief that liberal political correctness is running rampant on campus.
    • Jan 16, 2019
  • Wednesday: Headlines and the open line

    A legislative outrage leads the daily video roundup. Here's the open line.
    • Jan 16, 2019
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Slideshows

Most Recent Comments

 

© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation