New Arkansas food labeling law termed 'veg-on-veg crime' | Arkansas Blog

Sunday, April 14, 2019

New Arkansas food labeling law termed 'veg-on-veg crime'

Posted By on Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 8:30 AM

Reason writes here on new Arkansas legislation aimed at preventing vegetable-based food from being called meat and, particularly, on a crackdown in that law aimed at those who'd refer to cauliflower as rice.

The headline:

Arkansas’ New Food-Labeling Law Is Veg-on-Veg Crime

As the behest of agricultural lobbies, regulators around the world are making food marketing way more complicated than it needs to be.

The rice lobby in Arkansas is powerful, of course, and had no trouble passing a law making it a crime punishable by fine to label something cauliflower rice. That is, cauliflower chopped up into a rice shape. The sponsor was Rep. David Hillman, himself a member of the rice industry. Writes Baylen Linnekin, described as a "food lawyer":

“Yes, I will plead guilty to anyone that says I supported this to defend the rice industry,” Rep. Hillman told the Memphis Commercial Appeal. “But this is really a fairness issue and only affects those who intentionally mislead people.”

I’m not so sure.

“Efforts to ban words on food labels won’t stop consumers from purchasing the options they seek,” says Michele Simon, executive director of the Plant Based Foods Association, a trade group, in an email to me this week. “Instead of trying to pass unconstitutional laws, the rice (and meat and dairy) industries should be focusing on how to better meet changing consumer preferences. It’s called market competition.”

That sounds more like it to me.
Could you combine some cauliflower "rice" with soy "milk" and cook up rice pudding for your restaurant? And, if you did and called it rice pudding, would the Arkansas food cops come calling?

Another thought for the legislature to ponder, this one for meat champion Sen. Bruce Maloch: "Beefsteak" tomatoes?

More seriously, can this law really be enforced? It seems to be aimed at products such as the one illustrated above that refers to "riced" cauliflower . The law has this language for a violation:

Affixing a label that uses a variation of rice in the name of the agricultural product when the agricultural product is not rice or derived from rice.
I don't believe the term "riced cauliflower" is misleading. Any more than hot dog. Must cops become lexicographers?

Tags: , , , , ,


Comments (18)

Showing 1-18 of 18

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-18 of 18

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • One dead, two wounded in early morning shooting

    KARK's Susanne Brunner reports that one person has been killed and two wounded in a shooting shortly after 1 a.m. this morning near Roosevelt Road and Cross Street.
    • Apr 17, 2019
  • Reality bites at Little Rock City Hall; spending must be cut

    A followup to Rebekah Hall's earlier report on Little Rock Mayor Frank Scott Jr.'s announcement that cuts will be necessary in the city budget in part to pay for "priorities," such as his desire to expand the police force, but also to deal with the reality often mentioned here of stagnant to decling city sales tax revenue. Some quick ideas on that:
    • Apr 17, 2019
  • Speaking of hard times in newspapers: Democrat-Gazette's move to digital

    Word continues to filter in of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette's pullback from statewide circulation of a print daily edition of the newspaper — the latest from the Hot Springs area, just 50 or so miles down the road from Little Rock. Subscribers there were told home delivery of a print paper would end in May.
    • Apr 16, 2019
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Recent Comments


© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation