Q&A: John Schafer | Rock Candy

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Q&A: John Schafer

Posted By on Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:36 PM



Tonight, at Riverdale, "Slumberland," a buzzy feature film made by three dudes you've probably seen around town or at Pizza Cafe (all work there) — John Schafer, Rhett Brinkley and Zach Turner — debuts before what's sure to be a packed house. In advance of the debut, director Schafer talked to me about influences, shooting a movie on the cheap and working with friends. "Slumberland" screens at Riverdale 7:45 p.m., Thu. and 6:30 p.m. Sat.

How long has the project existed? Where’d it start?

It took about two years exactly. We were just kind of bored and started filming Rhett [Brinkley] and Zach Turner, who had some ideas they’d kind of developed on their own. We put together a little story arc and chipped away.

So this a just slightly fictionalized version of the real Rhett and Zach’s lives?

It’s loosely fictionalized. The emotions are real. Rhett’s relationship really had ended and that’s where his character was coming from. And Zach’s run-in with the law happened and gave him something to work from.

At least from the trailer, it seems like it fits in with the sort of films that Joe Swanberg and Andrew Bujalski are making, something from the so-called “mumblecore” movement.

Honestly, I’ve never seen any of those movies. Zach saw “Funny Ha-Ha” several months into filming and that kind of burst our bubble. We were kind of naïve. We thought we were doing something new. But as far as young people making movies with no budget, yeah, it fits in.

Another unifying thing about those films is that they’re all about post-collegiate, young-ish folks who can’t communicate at all.

That’s kind of central to our plot. Rhett and Dirty not really getting to the core of their problems with each other.
 
If not mumblecore, what were some other stylistic influences?

When we were beginning to put it together, I was watching films by the Maysles brothers and D.A. Pennebaker. I was watching “Don’t Look Back” almost every day. Films like “Salesmen,” “Grey Gardens.” I really wanted to make a ’60s documentary about my friends. I knew that it might be boring, so I wanted to give it some stylistic flourish.


Did you shoot with film or digitally?

On a digital camera. My parents got it for almost as “a we’re sorry” gift for sending me to UALR. It’s several years old. One of those 24P cameras.

What about editing?

I edited the whole thing on Mac Mini, using Sony Vegas, and for the most part, I edited as we shot, so we finished filming and editing just about the same time.

What about financing? Or was there any budget at all?

We only spent whatever money it cost for mini DV tapes. And I had to get a hard drive for editing.

Was it hard to convince your friends, beyond Rhett and Zach, to appear?

Everyone that was in it we had some kind of relationship. Luke Hunsicker’s been making movies with us for a while. Laura Fleishauer only had like three or four days before she was moving to Austin, so we had to do her scenes quickly, and we only had one take. The only thing we really worried about was wasting our friends’ time. Because we didn’t really know what we were doing.

Did you have a script, or more of a story outline?

That’s pretty much the way it was. We had a three-act structure. And we would get together between shooting and decide, “This is what’s happening.” “This is where this is going to go in the movie.” And Rhett and Dirty would think about their lines between shoots and write things down.

So does the finished product meet your expectations?

It’s really what we thought it would be. We knew it wasn’t going to look as good as we wanted. And we knew it wasn’t going to sound that great. We knew that we were making a low budget, homemade movie. But I feel like it’s entertaining enough and moves at a quick enough pace that people will sit through it and hopefully be entertained.

Are you hoping that this is something you can do as a career?

Isn’t that what everyone wants? We didn’t go all in for this movie. But going through this process, we’ve learned how to make a better movie.

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Lindsey Millar

  • The Guns and Taxes Edition

    Governor Hutchinson’s tax cut promises, guns, Medicaid and pharmacists and the Babe Bracket — all covered on this week's podcast.
    • Feb 16, 2018
  • Locked away and forgotten

    In 2017, teenagers committed to rehabilitative treatment at two South Arkansas juvenile lockups did not receive basic hygiene and clothing supplies and lived in wretched conditions.
    • Feb 14, 2018
  • The Dancin' with Bart Hester Edition

    A new lawsuit challenging the state’s photo ID law, Bart Hester vs. the humanities, signs of a threat to governors school, big bills for the state Supreme Court and Clarke Tucker making a run for Congress — all covered on this week's podcast.
    • Feb 9, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Arkansas Times Recommends: A Literary Edition

    Arkansas Times Recommends is a series in which Times staff members (or whoever happens to be around at the time) highlight things we've been enjoying this week.
    • Jul 1, 2016
  • Checking in with Hard Pass

    Shayne Gray talks with Mitch Vanhoose and Chad Conder of Hard Pass (formerly Cosby) ahead of the band's album release on July 22.
    • Jul 21, 2016
  • The trailer for Jeff Nichols' 'Loving' looks great

    The latest from Little Rock's Jeff Nichols hits theaters Nov. 4. It's Nichols' telling of the story of Richard and Mildred Loving, whose marriage led to the landmark civil rights case Loving v. Virginia, which ended laws preventing interracial marriage. Ruth Negga's performance as Mildred Loving generated Oscar talk after the film debuted at Cannes.
    • Jul 14, 2016

Most Shared

  • In the margins

    A rediscovered violin concerto brings an oft-forgotten composer into the limelight.
  • Donald Trump is historically unpopular — and not necessarily where you think

    My colleagues John Ray and Jesse Bacon and I estimate, in the first analysis of its kind for the 2018 election season, that the president's waning popularity isn't limited to coastal cities and states. The erosion of his electoral coalition has spread to The Natural State, extending far beyond the college towns and urban centers that voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. From El Dorado to Sherwood, Fayetteville to Hot Springs, the president's approval rating is waning.
  • Arkansans join House vote to gut Americans with Disabilities Act

    Despite fierce protests from disabled people, the U.S. House voted today, mostly on party lines, to make it harder to sue businesses for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act. Of course Arkansas congressmen were on the wrong side.

Most Recent Comments

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation