Favorite

A friend in a high place 

All that President Bush wanted to do was to put someone on the U. S. Supreme Court who would always be his friend because he might one day need one there. He remembered when Bill Clinton desperately needed friends on the court and didn’t have them, even among his own two appointees, the only Democrats on the court.

Roe v. Wade, Griswold v. Connecticut, Meyer v. Nebraska, stare decisis — all those things matter little as long as through thick and thin you can count on someone’s personal loyalty, like you can Karl Rove’s.

But all that Bush’s appointment of his friend and attorney Harriet E. Miers has proved is that he needed loyal friends even more than he knew. National Public Radio carried a report from Dallas Monday in which his right-wing Texas supporters were denouncing Miers’ appointment. Even a close female friend of Miers said that while Bush’s lawyer was a very sweet and charming lady she was a lightweight who never did anything in her life worthy of appointment to the highest court in the land, where Roe v. Wade might be overturned. Maybe Miers could sit on a district court or a court of appeals but not the Supreme Court. Spare us such close friends.

What they and apparently Bush’s whole evangelical base want is someone you know absolutely will say to hell with precedent and throw out everything back at least to 1953.

Someone like Judge Priscilla R. Owen, the angry Texas jurist whom the Senate recently confirmed to the 5th U. S. Court of Appeals. Owen had warmed the cockles of conservatives’ hearts by stretching Texas law to keep a young girl from getting an abortion and sitting on the case of a black kid who was left a quadriplegic when a sports car struck his stepfather’s pickup and delaying a decision until the boy died. His parents had sued Ford Motor Co. over a defective seat belt and Ford was represented by a big Texas law firm close to the Bush family that had given $20,450 to Owen’s campaign.

If Bush is forced to get Harriet Miers to “voluntarily” withdraw for the good of the court, which now seems to be the likeliest course, either Owens or Janice Rogers Brown of the District of Columbia Circuit is the likeliest successor. Both have made it clear that there is no cruelty they would not visit upon a supplicant for justice if a big corporation or the almighty government is on the other side.

Conservatives should understand the president’s need for loyalty, which is underscored by the campaign against Miers by a raft of right-wing commentators who until now have cheered his every move and explained away every disaster.

Even the right-wing scribblers are making fun of the girlish exclamations Miers regularly penned in notes to Bush when he was governor of Texas and she was his attorney or appointee to the Texas Lottery Commission: “Texas is blessed!,” “You are the best!,” “You are the best Governor ever — deserving of great respect!,” “You and Laura are the greatest!” “The state is in great hands.”

Then, the cruelest cut of all, from David Frum, Bush’s former speech“In the White House that hero worshipped the president,” Frum wrote, “Miers was distinguished by the intensity of her zeal: She once told me that the president was the most brilliant man she had ever met.”

Frum had already stung the president by his disloyalty. In a generally congratulatory book about the president after he left the White House, Frum made it clear that he did not share Miers’ view of Bush’s brilliance.

In one passage, Frum called Bush “impatient and quick to anger; sometimes glib, even dogmatic; often uncurious and as a result ill-informed; more conventional in his thinking than a leader should be.”

The spectacle over Miers’ nomination — Bush’s reversals over the importance of her religious convictions, the White House weird mating dance to signal conservatives that her secret agenda is theirs, its empty search for her Supreme Court bona fides (they are coming next week is the promise this week), the attacks from the far right as well as from liberals — has other and more serious consequences than the further weakening of a politically limp president.

The Supreme Court is the biggest loser by an incalculable margin. Whatever was left of its majesty has vanished. For 200 years it was the fortress for the rule of law in a democratic society, but the charade that politics is left at the door is stripped naked finally, if anyone continued to invest in that doctrine after the conservative majority intervened in 2000 to award the presidency to the man who finished second. It will not be allowed to recover that majesty anytime soon.


Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Trump's 'deal' on wall and dreamers is no bargain

    Donald Trump unveiled his great plan today — temporary protection for "dreamers" in return for  $5.7 billion worth of wall — but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has already explained why it falls short and some on is side are already crying "no amnesty."
    • Jan 19, 2019
  • An open line for reproductive justice

    Rain drove the speakers inside to the old Senate chamber at the state Capitol, but the rally for reproductive justice went on today as does the fight in a state where the majority who assemble at the Capitol most often act to restrict women's medical rights. The line is open on this and other topics.
    • Jan 19, 2019
  • Cotton, Boozman propose estate tax bonanza for billionaires

    Tom Cotton and John Boozman are dishonestly touting legislation that is a bonanza for the super wealthy as help for small businesses and farmers.
    • Jan 19, 2019
  • More »

More by Ernest Dumas

  • ACA will stand

    If you are worried about your health care — and that ought to be nearly everyone — pay no attention to the triumphant tweet of President Trump last Friday or the hurrah the same day from Leslie Rutledge, the Arkansas attorney general, after the most political judge in America declared the whole Affordable Care Act null and void.
    • Dec 20, 2018
  • Sex and Trump

    No one, least of all Donald Trump, should be surprised when sex puts him in mortal jeopardy, which seemed to be the case last week when his personal lawyer pleaded guilty to violating the law by arranging $280,000 in hush payments to a porn actress and a Playboy model who were prepared to tell voters about having sex with him.
    • Dec 13, 2018
  • A decent man

    The beatification of George H.W. Bush, which even the current president signaled was OK, would have surprised the 41st president, who seemed to have accepted the public's verdict that, although a waffler, he was a decent man who did his best and didn't do any harm to the people of the country or the world with whose well-being he was entrusted for a time.
    • Dec 6, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • Shrugging off sulfides

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported a shocker on its front page Sunday. The rotten-egg odor from the Koch brothers' sprawling paper plant at Crossett is still making people sick, but the state's pollution control agency is unaware of the problem.
    • Mar 29, 2018

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • ACA will stand

    If you are worried about your health care — and that ought to be nearly everyone — pay no attention to the triumphant tweet of President Trump last Friday or the hurrah the same day from Leslie Rutledge, the Arkansas attorney general, after the most political judge in America declared the whole Affordable Care Act null and void.
    • Dec 20, 2018
  • Sex and Trump

    No one, least of all Donald Trump, should be surprised when sex puts him in mortal jeopardy, which seemed to be the case last week when his personal lawyer pleaded guilty to violating the law by arranging $280,000 in hush payments to a porn actress and a Playboy model who were prepared to tell voters about having sex with him.
    • Dec 13, 2018
  • A decent man

    The beatification of George H.W. Bush, which even the current president signaled was OK, would have surprised the 41st president, who seemed to have accepted the public's verdict that, although a waffler, he was a decent man who did his best and didn't do any harm to the people of the country or the world with whose well-being he was entrusted for a time.
    • Dec 6, 2018
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • How nice... the lawyerly Democritus offers a personal criticism, without benefit of the reason for…

    • on January 18, 2019
  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • Please tell me that the Times did not give Lyons money to produce this drivel…

    • on January 17, 2019
 

© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation