Another misguided invasion 

As in the invasion of Iraq, the Bush administration is evoking 9-11 to justify the punishment of people who weren't responsible for 9-11.

It's the American people and their state governments who would suffer from this latest initiative. The administration demands that all state driver's licenses conform to new federal standards. In the name of national security, more information would be gathered about drivers, and the information would be shared among more government agencies. Individual Americans would lose more of what little privacy they have left. The states would once again lose millions of their own tax dollars in order to satisfy federal whim. And who would gain? Big Government, obviously. It would obtain more weapons with which to keep obstreperous citizens in line. Criminals would have more opportunity to steal identities and otherwise misuse what should be private information.

Seventeen states, including Arkansas, are resisting the administration's efforts to establish this national ID card. Other countries have such things. America has always been too free.

Civil libertarians are naturally hostile to the administration's plan. The American Civil Liberties Union says a national identity-card system “would irreparably damage the fabric of American life.” The Libertarian Party says the administration's plan is not only an unacceptable invasion of privacy, but an unconstitutional violation of states' rights. With courage, the people and the states can hold off the national ID card until the Bush administration leaves office next January. The next administration, whoever it is, will be more freedom-friendly than this one.

Chuck, not Huck

Unless God is on the Huckabee bandwagon too — a Huckabee suggestion as yet unconfirmed — Chuck Norris is the candidate's most famous supporter, and accompanies him at public appearances. We'd thought Norris another empty-headed entertainer lending his image, but it seems we misunderestimated him, as George Bush would say. At a recent rally, supporter Norris sounded wiser than candidate Huckabee.

Norris jabbed — figuratively — at a Huckabee opponent, Mitt Romney, for pouring more than $17 million of his own fortune into his presidential campaign. It's unfair that a rich candidate can have such an advantage, Norris said. He said presidential races should be federally funded and financially capped.

Of course, they should. But Huckabee hasn't endorsed Norris' proposal. Reason enough to prefer Norris to Huck, and probably to anyone else seeking the Republican nomination. Economic advantage is sacred in that party.



Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Arkansas Times Staff

Latest in Editorials

  • The end of an era

    We're sad to report that Doug Smith has decided to retire. Though he's been listed as an associate editor on our masthead for the last 22 years, he has in fact been the conscience of the Arkansas Times. He has written all but a handful of our unsigned editorials since we introduced an opinion page in 1992.
    • May 8, 2014
  • A stand for equality

    Last week, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel became the first elected statewide official to express support for same-sex marriage. His announcement came days before Circuit Judge Chris Piazza is expected to rule on a challenge to the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Soon after, a federal challenge of the law is expected to move forward. McDaniel has pledged to "zealously" defend the Arkansas Constitution but said he wanted the public to know where he stood.
    • May 8, 2014
  • Same old, same old

    Remarking as we were on the dreariness of this year's election campaigns, we failed to pay sufficient tribute to the NRA, one of the most unsavory and, in its predictability, dullest of the biennial participants in the passing political parade.
    • May 1, 2014
  • More »

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation