Anything for a buck 

Last week’s revelation that the UALR provost was trying to extort financial contributions from professors is just the latest indication of the rising stakes in academia. The pressure never used to be this intense, especially at public universities. There was always the occasional wealthy alum who donated a building or boosted the football team, but those gifts were not crucial to the survival of the campus. They supplemented a taxpayer-financed budget that covered the essentials. Today, our state doesn’t give its higher education institutions enough money to stay competitive. Perhaps that is because we have too many. The result is that Arkansas colleges and universities have to battle each other — and their counterparts around the nation — for the private donations that make the difference between progress and stagnation. The volunteer fundraiser has been replaced by teams of development officers who systematically extract money from every possible source. This new paradigm is epitomized by the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, which recently reached its $1 billion goal. If raising money seems to be the first priority of university administrators, you can barely fault them. Students need to be prepared for the global marketplace, and advanced classrooms and laboratories are expensive. Salaries for the best professors continue to rise as colleges compete for them. In fact, the UALR provost, David Belcher, only minimally apologized for his action, and UALR Chancellor Joel Anderson basically defended him. “The underlying concern his message reflected was valid,” Anderson said in a statement. “Internal participation, particularly of those in leadership positions, is important as we work to achieve increased private support for the university.” Some people might make the case that this kind of pressure is good for our public colleges and universities. It’s the survival of the fittest, and those who can convince the big donors to pony up will get ahead while the losers fall by the wayside. There is validity to that argument, and that kind of competition has always been productive in academia. But things seem to be getting more extreme, and the sense of manic desperation in Belcher’s message to the professors foretells something ominous. Dependent upon private donations for their very existence, will UALR and other colleges do anything to secure them? Belcher said UALR would “never again hire a chair or dean who will not agree as they enter the institution to contribute [$1,000]” and “those not wishing to demonstrate their commitment to the institution should in no way expect any assistance in raising external funds for their units. None, nada, zilch.” If UALR is so determined to get a handful of $1,000 donations, what would it do for more sizable amounts? For one idea, look back to Fayetteville. A Department of Education Reform was established there this year, and as Doug Smith wrote in a recent Arkansas Times cover story, cynical observers suggested it “might be a form of payback to the Waltons for the fabulous $300 million gift they made to the UA a couple of years ago, perhaps even a requirement of the gift.” He went on to say that these observers think “the department’s research and recommendations would unfailingly advance the educational interests of the Waltons, particularly the use of public money for vouchers to help children attend private schools.” Whether or not that is true, the supposedly objective work at a public university is being called into question before it even begins. There is at least the appearance of a quid pro quo. And this is only one example. When the big donors hold all of the cards (and they know it), the institution begins to reflect their priorities. This becomes a concern when the institution is public, because a donor’s priorities don’t necessarily coincide with the general public’s. Then the question becomes: Whose interests does the university serve? By no means should public higher education institutions stop raising money. Private support for scholarships and facilities helps give colleges a competitive edge. However, as a state we need to ensure that our colleges and universities have a basic level of funding through which they can still achieve excellence. A public university that can only survive through private donations isn’t really public anymore. It has lost its soul because it is no longer independent. And like a man who will say or do anything for a buck, that’s a sorry sight.


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

More by Warwick Sabin

  • Helena's disappearing buildings

    Preservationists hope to slow demolitions.
    • Mar 22, 2007
  • Trailers headed to Dumas

    Gov. Mike Beebe issued the following statement earlier today: Although this decision by FEMA to deny emergency funds to Desha County defies common sense, Arkansas will take care of its own people.
    • Mar 9, 2007
  • Youth Ranch robbed, vandalized

    According to a press release we just received: The Donald W. Reynolds Campus of the Arkansas Sheriff’s Youth Ranches (The Ranch) located near Fort Smith was vandalized overnight Thursday.  Items stolen during the break-in included all of the children’s saddles, food, tools and supplies from The Ranch’s carpentry shop and all equipment from its auto shop.  An investigation is underway with the Crawford County Sheriff’s Office.
    • Mar 9, 2007
  • More »

Latest in Warwick Sabin

  • Trickle-up theory

    Through thick and thin, there has always been one group of dedicated Americans whose support for President George W. Bush has been unwavering: The wealthy.
    • Mar 8, 2007
  • Time to go

    Tough questions face us in Iraq and it's time to confront them directly.
    • Mar 1, 2007
  • Plugged in

    One reason why the South remained solidly Democratic during the mid-20th century was the enduring gratitude to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who brought electricity to the poor, rural parts of the region. According to one historical account, “Althou
    • Feb 22, 2007
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • Yes, he's a liar. Yes, he's a stooge. But too few care.

    If the recently released Mueller Report proves nothing else, it’s that almost everything Trump derided as “Fake News” regarding his campaign’s conniving with Russian operatives during the 2016 election has proven to be remarkably accurate.

Most Recent Comments


© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation