Favorite

Banzai Boozman 

"Classicide" is not a word, yet, but we'll need something like it ("economic cleansing"?) if Republicans win their war on the middle class. You can't expect mercy from a party of John Boozmans.

A one-percent warrior with blood in his eye, Boozman is so opposed to any aid for average Americans that he not only voted against President Obama's plan to extend a tax cut for them, he voted against a Republican alternative too. Now understand that Arkansas's junior senator is devoutly partisan. When he doesn't do what Mitch McConnell says, it's for sure he's in a frenzy. He'll be attacking middle-class people on the street before long.

Obama wants to help 160 million people by continuing and expanding his 2 percent reduction in the payroll tax that went into effect this year. A typical family's taxes will go up more than $1,000 next year if the payroll tax reduction is not continued. (The White House has helpfully provided an online calculator so you can determine your own savings.) "Put money back in the pockets of working Americans," the president says. Impervious to the Christmas spirit, the Senate last week rejected the Obama proposal. Are there not workhouses?

To replace the tax revenue lost by continuing the reduction in the payroll tax, Obama would impose a small additional tax on income of more than $1 million. Protecting millionaires is what Republican senators do. But the leadership fears political retribution if the payroll tax reduction is not extended, so they proposed to continue the reduction and replace the lost tax revenue by firing 10 percent of all federal employees and freezing the pay of the rest. Federal employees are middle-class. The strategy fits.

That plan was rejected by the Senate too. As we said, Boozman voted against both. He seems to have drawn a line in the sand. Nothing that would benefit the middle class gets past him.

Part of the reason the Senate defeated Obama's plan — part of the reason the Senate can't get much of anything done these days — is that the body doesn't operate under the principle of majority rule anymore. Until recent years, most legislation required only a simple majority for approval. The Republicans now insist on virtually universal application of a Senate rule that allows them to require an extraordinary majority of 60 votes by threatening a filibuster. This is the same rule — not a constitutional provision — that allowed Southern Democrats and conservative Republicans to block civil rights legislation for years. But it was little used otherwise, and most work got done. Now, extremists like Boozman are at the wheel, and middle-class, middle-of-the-road Americans are at risk.

Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Speaking of John Boozman

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Most Shared

  • Conflicts of interest in the legislatures

    The Center for Public Integrity and the Associated Press collaborated for a project aimed at highlighting state legislators whose lawmaking might be affected by private business interests.
  • Industrial hemp pilot program coming soon to Arkansas

    One of the booths at this week's Ark-La-Tex Medical Cannabis Expo was hosted by the Arkansas Hemp Association, a trade group founded to promote and expand non-intoxicating industrial hemp as an agricultural crop in the state. AHA Vice President Jeremy Fisher said the first licenses to grow experimental plots of hemp in the state should be issued by the Arkansas State Plant Board next spring.
  • Cats and dogs

    I've always been leery of people who dislike animals. To my wife and me, a house without dog hair in the corners and a cat perched on the windowsill is as barren as a highway rest stop. We're down to three dogs and two cats, the smallest menagerie we've had for years.

Latest in Editorials

  • The end of an era

    We're sad to report that Doug Smith has decided to retire. Though he's been listed as an associate editor on our masthead for the last 22 years, he has in fact been the conscience of the Arkansas Times. He has written all but a handful of our unsigned editorials since we introduced an opinion page in 1992.
    • May 8, 2014
  • A stand for equality

    Last week, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel became the first elected statewide official to express support for same-sex marriage. His announcement came days before Circuit Judge Chris Piazza is expected to rule on a challenge to the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Soon after, a federal challenge of the law is expected to move forward. McDaniel has pledged to "zealously" defend the Arkansas Constitution but said he wanted the public to know where he stood.
    • May 8, 2014
  • Same old, same old

    Remarking as we were on the dreariness of this year's election campaigns, we failed to pay sufficient tribute to the NRA, one of the most unsavory and, in its predictability, dullest of the biennial participants in the passing political parade.
    • May 1, 2014
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

December

S M T W T F S
  1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31  

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Where cities go from here

    • So Florida says he was wrong the first time and the second time he says…

    • on December 10, 2017
  • Re: Cats and dogs

    • Dee-lightful column - and wonderfully written comments.

    • on December 10, 2017
  • Re: GOP contempt

    • If ineptitude and irrelevance had a poster boy, it would be Gene Lyons. He harangues…

    • on December 10, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation