Bipartisan virtue 

Bipartisan virtue

Extremism in support of private insurers is no virtue, and President Bush was defiantly unvirtuous in resisting a Medicare bill that preserves and strengthens government-funded health care for elderly Americans. The president was so out of the moral mainstream on Medicare that he alienated just about everyone who doesn't own an insurance company. The elderly, consumer groups, physicians, state health officials — even members of Bush's own party turned on him. The only Republican in the Arkansas congressional delegation, Rep. John Boozman, joined his five Democratic colleagues in voting for the bill and for the override of Bush's veto. One of those colleagues, Sen. Blanche Lincoln, said it was “unfortunate” that the president chose to veto a bill that would improve care and access for Arkansas Medicare beneficiaries, and provide critical financial assistance to doctors who treat Medicare patients. A stronger adjective would not have been out of place. The bill that was passed over Bush's veto blocks a cut in Medicare payments to doctors, and instead cuts payments to private companies who offer their own policies for the elderly in association with Medicare, and who typically are paid more than Medicare pays directly to doctors. A reduction in Medicare payments to doctors would have been particularly harmful in Arkansas, which already has the lowest such payments in the country, and which struggles to keep physicians treating Medicare patients. “I am proud Congress put partisan politics aside and stood united with our seniors, military families, and providers,” Lincoln said. To put partisan politics aside is something Bush has never seemed able, or willing, to do.


No-growth policy needed

Every one of the many studies done on the subject — including at least one the trucking industry paid for itself — has shown that big trucks do not pay their fair share for highway maintenance, that the cost of the damage they do to roads and bridges exceeds the amount of the taxes they pay. And yet, the truckers never stop asking permission to use even bigger vehicles, and quite often they get it. The current weight limit is 80,000 pounds. The industry is asking Congress to authorize a “demonstration project” that would allow trucks weighing up to 100,000 pounds in six states — Georgia, Maine, Michigan, South Carolina, Texas and Washington. Congress should put a stop to this scheme quickly. There's already plenty of research showing what bigger trucks do to highways. The results are not going to change, not in an honest study. Ample data is available on the subject of trucks and highway safety too. One statistic: Heavy trucks make up 3 percent of all registered vehicles. They account for 9 percent of fatal crashes. 


From the ArkTimes store


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Arkansas Times Staff

Most Shared

  • Guest Playlist: Flap Jones of "Not Necessarily Nashville" schools us on real country music

    "Not Necessarily Nashville," which airs on KUAR-FM 89.1 every Saturday, 7 p.m.-9 p.m., celebrates three decades of the "best of the rest of country music" Saturday, October 21 at the White Water Tavern with Brad Williams of The Salty Dogs & The Creek Rocks, and we asked host Flap Jones to curate a playlist for us ahead of that anniversary celebration.
  • Discussion: State killing of the mentally ill

    The Arkansas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and others will have a forum on mental illness and the death penalty at 6:30 p.m. Monday at the Bowen School of Law's Friday Courtroom.

Latest in Editorials

  • The end of an era

    We're sad to report that Doug Smith has decided to retire. Though he's been listed as an associate editor on our masthead for the last 22 years, he has in fact been the conscience of the Arkansas Times. He has written all but a handful of our unsigned editorials since we introduced an opinion page in 1992.
    • May 8, 2014
  • A stand for equality

    Last week, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel became the first elected statewide official to express support for same-sex marriage. His announcement came days before Circuit Judge Chris Piazza is expected to rule on a challenge to the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Soon after, a federal challenge of the law is expected to move forward. McDaniel has pledged to "zealously" defend the Arkansas Constitution but said he wanted the public to know where he stood.
    • May 8, 2014
  • Same old, same old

    Remarking as we were on the dreariness of this year's election campaigns, we failed to pay sufficient tribute to the NRA, one of the most unsavory and, in its predictability, dullest of the biennial participants in the passing political parade.
    • May 1, 2014
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »


1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31  

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Caution: government at work

    • The people of Arkansas need to keep demanding that our state government be accountable to…

    • on October 21, 2017
  • Re: Cotton to CIA?

    • Watching C-Span last week, they were talking about Cotton for the head of the FBI…

    • on October 21, 2017
  • Re: The casting couch

    • sigh............ I would argue that the idea of 'freedom from fear' is part of the…

    • on October 19, 2017

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation