Favorite

Building a health plan 

The biggest and potentially best news in many months was The New York Times’s report of secret meetings of business, union, liberal and conservative groups to produce a national health insurance plan, which they expect to present to Congress and the president by year’s end. Conducted away from the politicians and the public eye, the deliberations are supposed to yield a consensus middle way to dramatically broaden health coverage among the more than 45 million Americans who aren’t insured. Then all 24 of the groups, which sure enough represent enough muscle to sway Congress, will stand united until the program is enacted. That is the idea. While Congress is distracted by President Bush’s futile campaign to alter the character of Social Security, at least someone has their eye on the prize. Health insurance is the nation’s most urgent problem. But let’s not let our hopes soar. If the United States Chamber of Commerce, the Heritage Foundation, the insurance industry and drug companies find common ground with Families USA, AARP and the Service Employees International Union, how broad and helpful could it be? One of the ideas is state insurance purchasing pools, where individuals and small businesses could acquire coverage. The federal government would toss in a little money to help states administer them. But states, including Arkansas, have enacted such laws and they have tended to produce little. Another idea sounds equally familiar: tax credits for poor people and small businesses to help them purchase insurance. That was a big part of President Bush’s health insurance strategy in the campaign. He hasn’t mentioned it since then, for a reason. What benefit are tax credits to the poor unless the government provides a refundable credit large enough itself to buy insurance? Tax credits are nice incentives for the rich, who don’t need them to buy insurance. But the secret deliberations, which we are told were undertaken with some urgency, are a giant step. They are a recognition by big business that universal health insurance is not a scheme of crybaby liberals but a boon to business — no, a necessity for American business now that it has achieved a global economy. Corporations like General Motors, Ford and Daimler-Chrysler are increasingly uncompetitive because of their health-care costs. Arkansas has fresh reason to take notice. The giant Toyota plant that the state had hoped would build at a prime site in Crittenden County apparently will go instead to a site near Toronto, where the company can save more than $4 an hour per worker because Canada furnishes splendid medical coverage for everyone. Of course, the automakers realized that years ago. They supported President Clinton’s universal health care plan until the conservative campaign against it got too hot. Only Chrysler supported it at the end. Chrysler still favors a single-payer national system. General Motors admires the Canadian system but the chairman, who supported the single-payer idea in 1994 when Clinton was crafting his plan, now backs away from calling for the same in the United States, knowing that it will make him a pariah in boardrooms. That is what makes the secret negotiations for a national health program such a longshot for producing real remedies. A single-payer system apparently is off the table, and probably even a hybrid system that would be publicly financed and privately administered. The Times’ report said the participants worried about significantly increasing health-care spending, an element of almost any plan to enlarge coverage that doesn’t embrace the single-payer system. A single-payer system is the only way to avoid dramatically higher costs. You see, while Americans have less access to health care than almost every developed country, they spend far more on health care than all the others. In short, we spend more, get less. In 2001, the United States devoted 13.9 percent of GDP to medical care, compared with 9.7 percent in Canada, 9.5 percent in France and 8.7 percent in Sweden, countries with universal single-payer systems. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services expects healthcare outlays in the United States to rise from $1.8 trillion in 2004 to $2.7 trillion in 2010 with a smaller and smaller share of people covered. Much of the money — more than 30 percent — is spent on administration, or trying to get someone else to pay the bill. A study published in the International Journal of Health Services concluded that the country wastes more on healthcare bureaucracy than it would take to cover every single American. That part of the current system, the wasteful one, is the one part that the negotiators apparently are committed to maintain. But you can build on that. Hillary Clinton did in the failed 1994 plan. It would have maintained private administration, but the federal government would have made everyone, including every business, a player. Private insurance would have been acquired competitively through state and regional purchasing pools. It would be expensive but by maintaining the present system, waste and all, it should meet the test of the negotiators. If someone stripped out a thousand pages of needless rules and didn’t mention Hillary’s name, it would fly tomorrow.
Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

More by Ernest Dumas

  • ACA will stand

    If you are worried about your health care — and that ought to be nearly everyone — pay no attention to the triumphant tweet of President Trump last Friday or the hurrah the same day from Leslie Rutledge, the Arkansas attorney general, after the most political judge in America declared the whole Affordable Care Act null and void.
    • Dec 20, 2018
  • Sex and Trump

    No one, least of all Donald Trump, should be surprised when sex puts him in mortal jeopardy, which seemed to be the case last week when his personal lawyer pleaded guilty to violating the law by arranging $280,000 in hush payments to a porn actress and a Playboy model who were prepared to tell voters about having sex with him.
    • Dec 13, 2018
  • A decent man

    The beatification of George H.W. Bush, which even the current president signaled was OK, would have surprised the 41st president, who seemed to have accepted the public's verdict that, although a waffler, he was a decent man who did his best and didn't do any harm to the people of the country or the world with whose well-being he was entrusted for a time.
    • Dec 6, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • Shrugging off sulfides

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported a shocker on its front page Sunday. The rotten-egg odor from the Koch brothers' sprawling paper plant at Crossett is still making people sick, but the state's pollution control agency is unaware of the problem.
    • Mar 29, 2018

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • ACA will stand

    If you are worried about your health care — and that ought to be nearly everyone — pay no attention to the triumphant tweet of President Trump last Friday or the hurrah the same day from Leslie Rutledge, the Arkansas attorney general, after the most political judge in America declared the whole Affordable Care Act null and void.
    • Dec 20, 2018
  • Sex and Trump

    No one, least of all Donald Trump, should be surprised when sex puts him in mortal jeopardy, which seemed to be the case last week when his personal lawyer pleaded guilty to violating the law by arranging $280,000 in hush payments to a porn actress and a Playboy model who were prepared to tell voters about having sex with him.
    • Dec 13, 2018
  • A decent man

    The beatification of George H.W. Bush, which even the current president signaled was OK, would have surprised the 41st president, who seemed to have accepted the public's verdict that, although a waffler, he was a decent man who did his best and didn't do any harm to the people of the country or the world with whose well-being he was entrusted for a time.
    • Dec 6, 2018
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • How nice... the lawyerly Democritus offers a personal criticism, without benefit of the reason for…

    • on January 18, 2019
  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • Please tell me that the Times did not give Lyons money to produce this drivel…

    • on January 17, 2019
  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • Perhaps, dss, the relevant data is found in the types of jobs held by men…

    • on January 16, 2019
 

© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation