Favorite

Bullying the new guy 

Bullying the new guy

If a legislator wants an interim study of whether water flows uphill, his colleagues will oblige him, and likely pitch in a few thousand dollars of taxpayers' money to aid the investigation. As a matter of legislative etiquette, requests for interim studies are always approved.

Or so was the case until last week, when the joint Committee on Insurance and Commerce showed Rep. Richard Carroll the discourtesy of killing his proposal to study whether home warranties should be regulated. From this unusual action, we can deduce that: (1) Powerful special interests — realtors in this case — were opposed to the study. The realtors' fearful lobbyist, former Rep. Ted Mullenix, was working the room; committee members were armed with hostile questions for Carroll, who was unprepared for such an attack. (2) The proposal had merit. The General Assembly does not treat bad ideas cavalierly, whether they be in the form of bills, resolutions or interim studies. Truly, only the good die young in this arena. (3) Legislators were displeased with the sponsor of the study. One outspoken committee member, Rep. Allen Maxwell of Monticello, said openly what others would not — that committee members seemed to be conducting a vendetta against Carroll.

A winningly naive first-termer, Representative Carroll himself has not alleged that committee members were laying for him personally. He professes to believe that it was only his proposal that riled them. (The study, incidentally, was requested by Carroll constituents who feel that home warranty companies took advantage of them. The companies presently run loose.) But Carroll represents a working-class, predominantly black district in North Little Rock, and Carroll himself is a working man, a boilermaker. He's also white standing up for blacks. There are legislators who find all these circumstances distasteful. A representative of an upscale white district never need fear such harsh treatment for his interim-study requests.

Let it be noted that the committee co-chairmen, Sen. Barbara Horn of Foreman and Rep. Eddie Hawkins of Vilonia, both insurance agents, didn't just sit on their hands while a fellow legislator was being abused. To the contrary, they joined in the abuse, both voting to kill Carroll's request. They should apologize, or resign, and the committee should reconsider Carroll's request and approve it. If the study produces an actual bill, those who believe consumers need no protection can vote against it then. A slight delay before caving in is surely not too much to ask.

 

An odor of insincerity

For the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to say it's protective of workers' rights is like the Ku Klux Klan announcing support for affirmative action.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Favorite

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

More by Arkansas Times Staff

Latest in Editorials

  • The end of an era

    We're sad to report that Doug Smith has decided to retire. Though he's been listed as an associate editor on our masthead for the last 22 years, he has in fact been the conscience of the Arkansas Times. He has written all but a handful of our unsigned editorials since we introduced an opinion page in 1992.
    • May 8, 2014
  • A stand for equality

    Last week, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel became the first elected statewide official to express support for same-sex marriage. His announcement came days before Circuit Judge Chris Piazza is expected to rule on a challenge to the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Soon after, a federal challenge of the law is expected to move forward. McDaniel has pledged to "zealously" defend the Arkansas Constitution but said he wanted the public to know where he stood.
    • May 8, 2014
  • Same old, same old

    Remarking as we were on the dreariness of this year's election campaigns, we failed to pay sufficient tribute to the NRA, one of the most unsavory and, in its predictability, dullest of the biennial participants in the passing political parade.
    • May 1, 2014
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • The battle over Issue 1

    The odds are that the most spending in a statewide campaign in Arkansas this year will not be for a constitutional office, but instead in a battle over a proposed state constitutional amendment.
  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
  • Trump doctrine

    Let's face it: President Trump enjoys hurting and humiliating people, and that's the thing some of his loudest supporters like about him. Making women and children cry makes him feel manly and powerful. The more defenseless, the better. He particularly enjoys punishing racial minorities.
  • Inhuman America

    Our history has included some evil passages — slavery and white supremacy, the forced removal of Native Americans from their homes, the imprisonment and dispossession of Japanese Americans during World War II, the torture of prisoners in latter-day wars — but it is also a part of our history that we came to officially regard them all with shame, as offenses to the human rights that were our original values.
  • Where's the outrage?

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Him, again

    • That's why it is better to bag babes at the bigger libraries. You get a…

    • on June 20, 2018
  • Re: Legislative boodlers

    • The U6 unemployment rate is still at 8%, partly because they can get benefits and…

    • on June 19, 2018
  • Re: Him, again

    • Regardless of my success or lack of it, I've been way ahead of Trump all…

    • on June 19, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation