Favorite

Bush’s bad math 

It must be hard for most people to believe the two international reports that show a big gap between the math concepts and skills of young Americans and those of much of the rest of the developed world, which continues for a third generation and is growing. But how can you avoid the evidence at President Bush’s press conference Monday, when he tried to explain how his “reforms” were going to save Social Security and not aggravate its long-term financial problem? That has perplexed people since he first said he was going to rescue Social Security by having workers direct part of their payroll taxes into the stock and bond markets. Now and for the next 15 years, Social Security will add to its vast surplus, and it will support full benefits to everyone until at least 2042 or 2052, depending on whether you believe the Social Security trustees or the Congressional Budget Office. If something isn’t done, like lifting the earnings cap on the payroll tax, benefits would be lowered then. Reporters asked Bush to explain how reducing the amount of payroll taxes that are invested in government bonds for Social Security at every pay period and transferring the money instead into private investment accounts that workers would manage themselves would keep Social Security flush far beyond 2042 or 2052. “Yeah, I will try to explain how without negotiating with myself,” Bush said with a chuckle. But he couldn’t do it. “I think what you all — people ought to do is to go look at the Moynihan commission report,” he suggested, referring to the President’s Commission to Strengthen Social Security. That helps us a little, that is if the president is going to choose Model 2 of the Moynihan report, which seems most like what he is proposing. Bush hints that benefits will be cut under his plan but not for people who are already retired or are approaching retirement. Every worker would see his or her benefits cut but Bush says those who put payroll taxes aside in a private account would earn so much from it that it would more than offset the reduction in regular Social Security. It would be voluntary but if you didn’t choose to play with the stocks your benefits would be cut anyway to make the system solvent. Not many current workers would be excited about it. Under the commission’s plan —and presumably Bush’s — a worker who is 37 today and retires in 2032 would receive 17 percent less in regular benefits. For young workers the reduction would grow to a third. Today’s babies would see cuts of more than 40 percent from currently expected benefits. A study of the commission’s plans at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2002 concluded that the role of Social Security in allowing the elderly to maintain their standard of living after retirement would decline “rather sharply” over time if the private investment option becomes law. But Bush says he’s sure that younger workers who invested in the markets would see such big gains that it would offset the reductions in pensions and that those retirees could enjoy perhaps an even better life than they would under the present Social Security system. That calls for some wildly rosy assumptions, starting with the notion that the stock market will perform the next 30 years as it has the past 30. The most bullish analyst, even Bush’s Treasury Department, will have trouble showing an array of stock returns and dividend yields that will add up. It also assumes low administrative costs, although obviously not as low as Social Security’s 1 percent, which is one reason that it is the most efficiently run government program in world history. The Moynihan commission — Bush wanted us to check it out, remember — figured that it would cost about 10 times as much to administer if a government office managed the investments. But Bush says every worker would manage his own investments, subject to some limits so he doesn’t squander money on lottery tickets or some wild scheme, because otherwise he would not have real ownership, which to the president is the real reason to do it. If Wall Street or local banks and brokerages get their hands on the money, which is why the investment industry has been cheerleading for the “reform,” all bets are off. But that seems to be the key to the Bush plan. Chile and England do it that way now, and the government is having to come to the rescue. But none of that answers the basic math question. How will the private accounts and the diminished payroll taxes solve the cash problems of Social Security when they do finally come to roost? The commission’s answer was to divert trillions of dollars from general revenues. But that was when we thought we would always have a surplus. Bush’s loyal treasury secretary said it was easy. Just pick a figure in the trillions and we’ll borrow it. If that’s the answer, who needs math at all?
Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Silly acts, good law

    It was unavoidable that the struggle by sexual minorities to gain the equal treatment that the Constitution promises them would devolve into silliness and that the majestic courts of the land would have to get their dignity sullied in order to resolve the issues.
    • Dec 14, 2017
  • Renowned reporter and author Roy Reed dies at 87

    Obituary by Ernie Dumas.
    • Dec 11, 2017
  • Tax lies

    If Aristotle's famous principle can be stretched from the theater of art to the theater of politics, we may soon discover whether the Republican tax cuts will challenge the public's "willing suspension of disbelief."
    • Dec 7, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • No tax help for Trump

    The big conundrum is supposed to be why Donald Trump does so well among white working-class people, particularly men, who do not have a college education.
    • Aug 11, 2016
  • Dollars and degrees

    Governor Hutchinson says a high graduation rate (ours is about the lowest) and a larger quotient of college graduates in the population are critical to economic development. Every few months there is another, but old, key to unlocking growth.
    • Aug 25, 2016

Most Shared

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Silly acts, good law

    It was unavoidable that the struggle by sexual minorities to gain the equal treatment that the Constitution promises them would devolve into silliness and that the majestic courts of the land would have to get their dignity sullied in order to resolve the issues.
    • Dec 14, 2017
  • Tax lies

    If Aristotle's famous principle can be stretched from the theater of art to the theater of politics, we may soon discover whether the Republican tax cuts will challenge the public's "willing suspension of disbelief."
    • Dec 7, 2017
  • Not net neutral

    The Washington swamp that Donald Trump was going to drain gets deeper and wider every week.
    • Nov 30, 2017
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

December

S M T W T F S
  1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31  

Most Viewed

  • A difference

    How low can a columnist go? On evidence, nowhere near as low as the president of the United States. I'd intended to highlight certain ironies in the career of U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.). The self-anointed moral arbiter of the Senate began her career as a tobacco company lawyer — that is, somebody ill-suited to demand absolute purity of anybody, much less Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.).
  • Gratitude

    Now, more than ever, I find myself thankful for those who resist. Those who remind us of our higher common values. The fact-checkers and truth-tellers. Those who build bridges in communities instead of walls to segregate. The ones who stand up and speak out against injustice.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Gratitude

    • Thanks for the information about the rally Saturday.

    • on December 15, 2017
  • Re: Money talks

    • I understand what you are saying about money, but there are always exceptions and a…

    • on December 15, 2017
  • Re: A difference

    • History is likely to move with light speed in concluding that in late 2017 society…

    • on December 14, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation