Favorite

Bush's mean budget 

I’ve been thinking a lot about fairness lately. It’s the Word of the Month right now at my son’s school — a public school, where, contrary to the railings of conservative pundits, he receives steady doses of “character education” and “values education.” This instruction comes not only from studying great people’s lives and deeds, but also from regular lessons on specific moral values that are taught by the guidance counselor, posted on the walls, and spoken over the intercom. Fairness is also what’s on my mind when I pick up the budget proposal that President Bush just sent to Congress. As even elementary students know, fairness means that people are treated equally — that no one is given special privileges or allowed to shirk consequences. Fairness is a situation where all people have commensurate opportunities. But our current Administration repeatedly un-levels the playing field, blocks the fair shot, and withholds the fair share. The budget that President Bush sent to Congress includes deep cuts in that wedge of the federal pie called “domestic programs.” These include both entitlement programs like food stamps and Medicaid, which float to meet fluctuating needs, and discretionary programs, which are set at fixed levels every year. Both are slated for substantial cuts that will be achieved by immediate, substantial reductions as well as by caps that would lock in their funding for years to come. As an example, by 2010 elementary and secondary education in Arkansas will be cut by $110.4 million. This includes radical cuts to education for the disadvantaged, special education, and school improvement money. The cuts are not only deep, but broad in scope: farm subsidies, rural development programs, conservation and environmental protection programs, food stamps, WIC, job readiness programs, community food and nutrition, housing vouchers, utility assistance, Head Start, police community development, and community services are all on the cutting block. Whatever happened to compassion (Word of the Month for December)? These cuts are aimed at middle- and low-income taxpayers as if to punish them for not being well-off. Those most affected are the same people who disproportionately send their children to war — people who were not born to privilege and who, despite hard work and regular bill-paying, will find it harder to acquire basic financial security. The Word of the Month for November was honesty. In several ways this budget is less than straightforward. First, many of the cuts the president has proposed are designed to appear less severe on paper, because they take the form of structural changes in individual programs (such as collapsing programs into others, or consigning them as block grants to the states for state legislators to decide what to do with them). This allows the federal government to wash its hands of many crucial programs, ducking the hassle and expense of running them while denying any blame for their demise. Also, certain truncated programs have been given false and misleading names, such as the “Strengthening America’s Communities” Act, which actually eliminates $9 billion in community services. A third disingenuous strategy of the administration is subverting established congressional procedures. In order to push the cuts through on a fast track, Republicans are using something called the budget reconciliation resolution, which was created to speed budget decisions back when members of Congress were truly trying to balance the budget by restraining spending and raising taxes. Now they are using this mechanism to expedite their gouging of civic services in hopes that the public won’t have time to notice or respond. In the next few weeks Republicans are going to spew a lot of verbiage about so-called waste and fraud in domestic programs. They’re going to holler about the need for tightening our belts. Ironically, though, these program cuts have come about as a result of an unprecedented, deficit-bloating removal of taxes on the richest. Those who have profited from the largesse of our economy and the bounty of our natural resources are shirking their taxpaying duties. They’re not tightening their own belts, they’re loosening them as fast as they can. And to give them a tax break — to lighten millionaires’ and multimillionaires’ tax burden by an average $136,295 apiece — we are giving up the core health of our schools, our natural heritage, and our community. At the urging of the administration, Congress is considering making these tax cuts more extensive and permanent. Which reminds me, I do give them high marks on one character trait. That would be perseverance — the Word of the Month for January. The majority leaders are certainly persevering in their mission of making the rich richer, the poor poorer, and our nation unstable and disliked. Coulter is the executive director of the Arkansas Hunger Coalition and an instructor in the English Department at Hendrix College.
Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • No tax help for Trump

    The big conundrum is supposed to be why Donald Trump does so well among white working-class people, particularly men, who do not have a college education.
    • Aug 11, 2016
  • Dollars and degrees

    Governor Hutchinson says a high graduation rate (ours is about the lowest) and a larger quotient of college graduates in the population are critical to economic development. Every few months there is another, but old, key to unlocking growth.
    • Aug 25, 2016
  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018

Most Shared

  • In the margins

    A rediscovered violin concerto brings an oft-forgotten composer into the limelight.
  • Donald Trump is historically unpopular — and not necessarily where you think

    My colleagues John Ray and Jesse Bacon and I estimate, in the first analysis of its kind for the 2018 election season, that the president's waning popularity isn't limited to coastal cities and states. The erosion of his electoral coalition has spread to The Natural State, extending far beyond the college towns and urban centers that voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. From El Dorado to Sherwood, Fayetteville to Hot Springs, the president's approval rating is waning.
  • Arkansans join House vote to gut Americans with Disabilities Act

    Despite fierce protests from disabled people, the U.S. House voted today, mostly on party lines, to make it harder to sue businesses for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act. Of course Arkansas congressmen were on the wrong side.

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Conley's plea

    Even with his facial stubble, Garrard Conley looks and acts like a diffident teenager, not a 33-year-old man who is a leading exponent of the "gay agenda," as right-wingers refer to the movement to gain equal treatment for sexual minorities.
    • Feb 15, 2018
  • Inspired by LBJ

    Ordinarily, you turned to Lyndon B. Johnson to dislocate a congressman's elbow and to get things done, not for oratory and inspiration. For that, you had Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and John F. Kennedy.
    • Feb 1, 2018
  • Love that deficit

    Is 2018 the year that Americans finally learn to love the deficit? It has all the makings for such a phenomenon, at least for one year.
    • Jan 25, 2018
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

February

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28  

Most Viewed

  • Donald Trump is historically unpopular — and not necessarily where you think

    My colleagues John Ray and Jesse Bacon and I estimate, in the first analysis of its kind for the 2018 election season, that the president's waning popularity isn't limited to coastal cities and states. The erosion of his electoral coalition has spread to The Natural State, extending far beyond the college towns and urban centers that voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. From El Dorado to Sherwood, Fayetteville to Hot Springs, the president's approval rating is waning.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Out of control

    • And Olphart - hey, That is a witty reply - good for you!

    • on February 17, 2018
  • Re: Out of control

    • Oh for god's sake - read the play - just read the play before going…

    • on February 16, 2018
  • Re: Out of control

    • Aloysius, Not even a large man with a bodyguard detail acting in a way intended…

    • on February 16, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation