Charter school wisdom 

The state Board of Education last week demonstrated a more searching approach to charter school applications than it has sometimes shown.

Faced with eight charter school applications, the Board approved only the KIPP Academy's expansion of its charter to Blytheville. KIPP's proven success at reaching disadvantaged students in Helena made it an obvious choice.

Among others, the board rejected transparent efforts to avoid school consolidation plus an Oklahoma charter school operator's effort to expand into Springdale. The Springdale School District argued persuasively that the charter school would provide nothing the district wasn't already providing.

The legislative history is clear. Charter schools are supposed to provide opportunities for students being failed by existing conventional school districts or to provide programs not otherwise available. They also must demonstrate the tools to succeed.

Some schools approved in Pulaski County demonstrated little more than a desire to create a place for students who prefer not to attend any of the three majority-black, majority-poor conventional local school districts. Several of the schools are now majority-white and majority-middle-class, with little in the way of unique programs. Where they've taken students from public schools, they've overwhelmingly been students already making good academic progress.

The Little Rock School District argues that the state should consider such resegregation when it reviews charter school applications. The state may seek a legal opinion on that, but it should consider more than a strict legal reading.

The Little Rock district wants the state to consider the county's special circumstances in charter reviews as a condition of ending state financial payments in the Pulaski desegregation case. Until now, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel has refused to give any ground on charter schools.

But Chris Heller, Little Rock's attorney, recently made a reasonable suggestion. Little Rock could, for example, end its opposition to a pending charter proposal for a school for black males. But why can't the state impose some designated percentages for at-risk populations in the charter schools created in Pulaski County? The state also could commit to careful review of existing charter schools. Are they reaching students who need the most help?

The state has been in court for better than 50 years precisely because of official efforts to separate people by color and class. It makes no sense for the state to end that court case by demanding, in the name of charter schools, “separate but equal” all over again.



Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Arkansas Times Staff

  • Friday's headlines and your holiday open line

    What happened at the State Board of Education and what does it mean; Legislation filed for Hutchinson's government reorganization plan; Pediatric flu-related death in Arkansas reported; Suspect arrested in unsolved 2008 North Little Rock homicide.
    • Dec 21, 2018
  • New episode of Rock the Culture: "Juice In Your Own Life"

    In this week’s episode, Charles and Antwan provide perspective and conversation on the Little Rock Mayoral Election and State Board of Education’s consideration of the anticipated request to waive the Fair Teacher Dismissal Act. In addition, Charles and Antwan discuss all things happening in the Little Rock School District with Superintendent Michael Poore.
    • Dec 11, 2018
  • End of the week headlines and your open line

    Alderman candidate misses chance to cast deciding vote for himself in runoff election; Dem-Gaz to phase out print delivery in El Dorado, Camden and Magnolia; Rapert threatens UA Fort Smith over 'Drag Queen Story Time' event; The Van seeks to raise $35,000 in three weeks for new warehouse facility in South Little Rock.
    • Dec 7, 2018
  • More »

Latest in Editorials

  • The end of an era

    We're sad to report that Doug Smith has decided to retire. Though he's been listed as an associate editor on our masthead for the last 22 years, he has in fact been the conscience of the Arkansas Times. He has written all but a handful of our unsigned editorials since we introduced an opinion page in 1992.
    • May 8, 2014
  • A stand for equality

    Last week, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel became the first elected statewide official to express support for same-sex marriage. His announcement came days before Circuit Judge Chris Piazza is expected to rule on a challenge to the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Soon after, a federal challenge of the law is expected to move forward. McDaniel has pledged to "zealously" defend the Arkansas Constitution but said he wanted the public to know where he stood.
    • May 8, 2014
  • Same old, same old

    Remarking as we were on the dreariness of this year's election campaigns, we failed to pay sufficient tribute to the NRA, one of the most unsavory and, in its predictability, dullest of the biennial participants in the passing political parade.
    • May 1, 2014
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • Of Freud and foolishness

    I’ve been suspicious of psychologists bearing theories ever since my graduate school "Eureka!" about Freud and Dostoyevsky.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • I can only speak for myself; but, it seems that I was never quite so…

    • on January 15, 2019
  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • Hear ! Hear ! Down with poppycock !

    • on January 15, 2019

© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation