Favorite

Court needs a report 

If the justices of the Arkansas Supreme Court were half as power hungry as the governor, his successor and a few legislative leaders say they are, this state would be a far better place.

Its schools, anyway, would be doing a better job of serving the children.

But the current Supreme Court is only modestly bolder than all its conservative predecessors. All that is missing is the eternal forbearance of the justices who went before them toward the men who run the policy branches of the government. A quarter-century of dalliance by legislators and governors and a half-dozen orders by the Supreme Court will try any judge’s patience.

Five of the seven justices last week extended the Lake View school case until the end of May, which is soon after the 2007 legislature should be adjourning. The justices went out of their way to say that they would not be riding herd on the legislature and the new governor, though we should hope that they would, and that all they really wanted was for the state officials to explain to the court exactly what they had done this year to comply with the Constitution and the court’s previous orders.

But you would have thought that the court had revoked habeas corpus. Gov. Huckabee, who has denounced the court before praising it and denouncing it again, said he was “disgusted” with the court, which he said was “out of control” and “out of compliance” with something. Attorney General Mike Beebe, the governor-elect, was only “disappointed” but he said the court had ignored fundamental doctrine. In truth, it was he and his clients.

A year ago, the Supreme Court said that the legislature and Gov. Huckabee had failed in several ways to do what they solemnly promised in acts that they had passed in 2004, which was to make education the No. 1 priority of the state by funding a suitable and equal education program first. The court identified the failures, which came about when the legislature in 2005 ignored the laws that it had passed the previous year. The court gave the state until last week to fix things. When the state demonstrated that it had done it, the court would then issue its mandate and the 14-year-old case would end.

Huckabee called a special session in the spring, they raised school spending by $87 million this year and took other steps to comply, and they agreed that indeed they had fixed things. But they never reported to the court either what they had done or how those steps had repaired the failings. The attorney general’s office said they talked about filing a report to the court but decided to lay low and see if the school plaintiffs raised objections.

The school plaintiffs waited, too, and then on Nov. 17, two weeks before the deadline, filed a motion saying the legislation fell short of addressing the needs. Beebe replied to the court that the schools had waited too late.

But it was Beebe and his clients who were too late. Beebe’s office insisted that the Supreme Court never said that it should report what the state had done to meet its obligation, arguing in effect that the court should have explained an attorney’s duty to the court and his clients.

A court decides a case based on evidence, not upon what the judges may happen to have seen on television or read in the papers about the case. I learned this in 1972 when the attorney general subpoenaed me as a witness in a federal trial on legislative reapportionment. The attorney general wanted to submit as evidence of the Board of Apportionment’s superb work an article I had written analyzing the reapportionment’s effect on African-American representation in the legislature.

Hardly had I revealed my name when the magnificent Republican judge, J. Smith Henley, stopped the questioning.

“Mr. Thornton,” he inquired of the attorney general, “is it your aim to have a newspaper story by Mr. Dumas entered as probative evidence in this case?”

“Yes, your honor,” he said.

“Then, Mr. Dumas, step down and go back to your work, whatever it is,” the judge said. He explained to the state’s lawyer that he had better have real evidence because an article by a scruffy newspaperman is only evidence that he wrote it, not proof that the Constitution has been obeyed.

The state Supreme Court seems to operate by the same doctrine. Judge Henley, incidentally, rode herd on the Arkansas prisons for many years.

Huckabee’s outrage was directed at two old friends, Justice Betty Dickey of Pine Bluff, who was his counsel when he put her on the court, and Carol Dalby of Texarkana, whom he appointed to the court to hear this specific suit. Both voted last week to continue the case to see if justice had been done.

The egressing and ingressing governors would do well to heed Dalby’s plaintive appeal a year ago when the court gave the state another chance.

“There is upon the horizon the goal of a general, suitable, and efficient system of free public schools for all children of our state,” she wrote. “That goal will one day be attained and upon attainment a mighty shout of rejoicing will be heard by and for the real victors of this struggle, our children. The echoes of all the combined efforts to reach this goal will be heard and felt throughout the valleys, the forests, the mountains, and the most hidden and tucked-away places of our state for generations to come.”

She should not hold her breath.

Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Silly acts, good law

    It was unavoidable that the struggle by sexual minorities to gain the equal treatment that the Constitution promises them would devolve into silliness and that the majestic courts of the land would have to get their dignity sullied in order to resolve the issues.
    • Dec 14, 2017
  • Renowned reporter and author Roy Reed dies at 87

    Obituary by Ernie Dumas.
    • Dec 11, 2017
  • Tax lies

    If Aristotle's famous principle can be stretched from the theater of art to the theater of politics, we may soon discover whether the Republican tax cuts will challenge the public's "willing suspension of disbelief."
    • Dec 7, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • No tax help for Trump

    The big conundrum is supposed to be why Donald Trump does so well among white working-class people, particularly men, who do not have a college education.
    • Aug 11, 2016
  • Dollars and degrees

    Governor Hutchinson says a high graduation rate (ours is about the lowest) and a larger quotient of college graduates in the population are critical to economic development. Every few months there is another, but old, key to unlocking growth.
    • Aug 25, 2016

Most Shared

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Silly acts, good law

    It was unavoidable that the struggle by sexual minorities to gain the equal treatment that the Constitution promises them would devolve into silliness and that the majestic courts of the land would have to get their dignity sullied in order to resolve the issues.
    • Dec 14, 2017
  • Tax lies

    If Aristotle's famous principle can be stretched from the theater of art to the theater of politics, we may soon discover whether the Republican tax cuts will challenge the public's "willing suspension of disbelief."
    • Dec 7, 2017
  • Not net neutral

    The Washington swamp that Donald Trump was going to drain gets deeper and wider every week.
    • Nov 30, 2017
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

December

S M T W T F S
  1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31  

Most Viewed

  • Gratitude

    Now, more than ever, I find myself thankful for those who resist. Those who remind us of our higher common values. The fact-checkers and truth-tellers. Those who build bridges in communities instead of walls to segregate. The ones who stand up and speak out against injustice.
  • A difference

    How low can a columnist go? On evidence, nowhere near as low as the president of the United States. I'd intended to highlight certain ironies in the career of U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.). The self-anointed moral arbiter of the Senate began her career as a tobacco company lawyer — that is, somebody ill-suited to demand absolute purity of anybody, much less Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.).
  • Money talks

    Democratic candidates face a dilemma in Arkansas. To take on the GOP members who are firmly entrenched in the state Legislature and Congress, they will need lots of money and lots of votes. The easiest way to get more votes is to spend more money. Obscene amounts of money. And thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision and President Trump's judicial appointments, this will be our reality for a long time. The six Republicans who make up our congressional delegation have stopped pretending to care about their constituents. They vote in line with the interests of big corporations and lobbyists. They know what side their bread is buttered on.
  • Silly acts, good law

    It was unavoidable that the struggle by sexual minorities to gain the equal treatment that the Constitution promises them would devolve into silliness and that the majestic courts of the land would have to get their dignity sullied in order to resolve the issues.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: A difference

    • Gillibrand is a tough chick, and she knows she is a political whore, like 95%…

    • on December 14, 2017
  • Re: Cats and dogs

    • I miss my wolves. It has been over five years since the last of my…

    • on December 12, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation