Favorite

Court's prod needed 

In one stroke, the ... court violated those precepts of judicial restraint and constitutional interpretation which it most frequently has insisted on in the past; it transformed itself into a superlegislature. So reasoned the minority of the Arkansas Supreme Court and a few other critics of the court’s decision on June 9 to once more consider whether the legislature and Gov. Huckabee did their constitutional duty by Arkansas children. But those are not the precise words of the three minority justices or of the lay critics of the court’s extraordinary decision in the Lake View school case. They were written in 1962 by James Jackson Kilpatrick, the eloquent Virginia editor whose book “The Southern Case for School Segregation” was the Southern bible for a while. The object of his scorn was the May 17, 1954, decision of the U.S. Supreme Court outlawing school segregation. This is not to imply that there is the slightest moral equivalence between Southern defenders of school segregation and those who object to the state Supreme Court’s instant review of the legislature’s and governor’s labors to comply with the court’s order that they transform Arkansas schools into a constitutional system — one that gives every child in the state a good chance for a proper education. Chief Justice Jim Hannah, who wrote the strongest dissent in the Lake View decision and used Kilpatrick’s language, would profoundly object to any linkage to segregationists. But here is what connects the cases and the critics of the jurisprudence that was involved in each: Both cases were the most dramatic to confront the respective high courts in a century, and the decisions raised the dark and troubling question about defiance and who might have the will or the power to enforce the decisions. In the Lake View case, of course, there is no instant order that needs enforcing, and given the close split on the court there likely will never be one. The majority appointed two masters, former justices, who will marshal evidence of how well the other two branches carried out the court’s mandate of 2002 to provide a suitable and equal education to all. But by recalling its mandate and assuming jurisdiction, the court raised the possibility of a fresh order that will require far greater spending on education and the specter of defiance by the legislature and perhaps even the governor. There is talk of that by Republicans in Kansas and Texas, where the courts this spring have ordered huge new spending on education to meet similar constitutional mandates and handed the legislatures and governors deadlines for acting. That is enough for justices and even cautious admirers of the courts to recoil from sweeping and extraordinary decisions. What does the court do to enforce its order? Despite the exclamations that the Arkansas court is acting as a “superlegislature,” it clearly is not going beyond the historic scope of the judiciary by judging whether legislative and executive actions are constitutional. If the Supreme Court should ultimately direct the levy of a tax for the schools or another specific remedy someone then might claim that there had indeed been a judicial coup de main and that it had usurped legislative prerogative. But at least a couple of majority justices made it clear that they would never do that. The separation of powers is not in danger. Still, the question of enforcement clearly troubles some justices. So they wrote that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction now because the legislature last year created an entirely new public school system in Arkansas and that system must be attacked afresh with a new lawsuit in circuit court. The old system that the court declared unconstitutional is gone. But Arkansas schools, as most teachers, students and parents will testify, are 90 percent unchanged. Unless you are one of the handful of patrons of consolidated schools, it is the same old school system, perhaps marginally improved. In the second Brown decision, the U.S. Supreme Court dispatched jurisdiction to federal district courts in the South, and for a while the relief of Southerners was justified. Deep South judges tended not to carry out the order to integrate the schools until appellate courts like the 5th and 8th circuits stiffened their spines. But the president of the United States ultimately ended the doubt and enforced the orders, Dwight Eisenhower at Little Rock in 1957 and Richard M. Nixon in 1968 when his Justice Department moved every Southern community to finally end separate schools. The constitutional crisis everyone fears in Arkansas occurred 18 months ago when the legislature and governor dragged their feet for months. When the Supreme Court re-entered the case the other branches did their duty and enacted reforms, including a modest tax program. If called upon, they will do it again because everyone understands that is how the system works. The issue is not whether the legislature this year did some good by the schools or quite a bit. It is whether it fully complied with the letter of the Constitution, which the Supreme Court has properly defined. Those are not extraordinary or unprecedented things for either the court or the legislature and governor to do. They are the very bedrock of our republic.
Favorite

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • LR charter school application withdrawn for this year

    Friendship Aspire Academy has withdrawn its request to move up plans to open a charter school in Little Rock by a year to take advantage of a vacant building being remodeled by the Walton Family Foundation for another charter operator that withdrew.
    • Jun 20, 2018
  • Another prison death under investigation

    John Howell, 58, who was serving a life sentence for capital murder in Garland County, died shortly before 7 p.m. Tuesday after being found unresponsive on the floor of his barracks at the Cummins Unit, a spokesman said.
    • Jun 20, 2018
  • With Trump, of course, there's a catch

    So the heroic Donald Trump proposes a compromise to tearing families apart - jailing them indefinitely.
    • Jun 20, 2018
  • More »

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Legislative boodlers

    Which sounds like the best use of your taxpayer dollars: helping pay for medical care for unemployed people, or bribing and lobbying legislators and other government officials to bestow millions of your tax dollars on a corrupt organization that claims it helps poor people who have drug problems or disabilities?
    • Jun 14, 2018
  • Scary Granny Pelosi

    Nancy Pelosi has replaced Barack Obama as the all-purpose bete noir of Republican politicians, including Arkansas's, but will she be as potent as the black president?
    • Jun 7, 2018
  • Darkly paid judges

    This is the third Arkansas election cycle in a row where corporate interests have used the cover of dark money and semisecret political action committees to try to install cozy appellate judges.
    • May 31, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • Shrugging off sulfides

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported a shocker on its front page Sunday. The rotten-egg odor from the Koch brothers' sprawling paper plant at Crossett is still making people sick, but the state's pollution control agency is unaware of the problem.
    • Mar 29, 2018

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Legislative boodlers

    Which sounds like the best use of your taxpayer dollars: helping pay for medical care for unemployed people, or bribing and lobbying legislators and other government officials to bestow millions of your tax dollars on a corrupt organization that claims it helps poor people who have drug problems or disabilities?
    • Jun 14, 2018
  • Scary Granny Pelosi

    Nancy Pelosi has replaced Barack Obama as the all-purpose bete noir of Republican politicians, including Arkansas's, but will she be as potent as the black president?
    • Jun 7, 2018
  • Darkly paid judges

    This is the third Arkansas election cycle in a row where corporate interests have used the cover of dark money and semisecret political action committees to try to install cozy appellate judges.
    • May 31, 2018
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Him, again

    • That's why it is better to bag babes at the bigger libraries. You get a…

    • on June 20, 2018
  • Re: Legislative boodlers

    • The U6 unemployment rate is still at 8%, partly because they can get benefits and…

    • on June 19, 2018
  • Re: Him, again

    • Regardless of my success or lack of it, I've been way ahead of Trump all…

    • on June 19, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation