David Smith 1 | Arkansas news, politics, opinion, restaurants, music, movies and art

David Smith 1 
Member since May 28, 2015


Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Stats

Recent Comments

Re: “Who knew? Global trade is complicated

'PROTECTING' the 'HARMLESS' TAXPAYERS/VOTERS from the TREATIES' SHIFT of LIABILITIES from CORPORATIONS to VOTERS is NOT 'TRADE PROTECTIONISM'; TERMS of The WAD ACCORD PROTECTS SHAREHOLDERS & the 'HARMLESS' TAXPAYERS.

PAYING TPP, ET AL, TRADE/'ARRANGEMENTS' TRIBUNAL PENALTIES COMES FROM BUDGETS for HEALTHCARE, SOCIAL PROGRAMS, et al

DECADES of LITIGATION AHEAD for WANNA-BE MILLIONAIRE TPP, et al, INVESTORS as Financially Ruinous & Unapproved Morphing of Treaty/'Arrangements' Punish Taxpaying Voters; The Global Corporate Assocs. will get it 'Even More Right' after Dark (without Scrutiny)?

The BASIS for TREATIES/'ARRANGEMENTS' LITIGATION as an INVESTMENT (FULL Article, see, davidehsmith.wordpress.com)

'The SUBMISSION to The Supreme Court of Canada;
The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of America, the Trans-Pacific nations, the EU, Canada, China, et al
v.
The 'harmless' Canadian NON-shareholders, et al, both; Native & non Native'.
(For Excerpts of 'The SUBMISSION', see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com
For The FULL SUBMISSION, see; The Supreme Court of Canada)

SUING the GLOBAL CORPORATE ECONOMY; GETTING TPP, et al, nations to PAY The COMPENSATION; WHO KNEW WHAT & WHEN?

BETTER CHANCE of INVESTORS GETTING PAID & the 'harmless' CITIZENS REMAINING NON-LIABLE IF U.S. & CANADA OUT of GLOBAL TREATIES?
WHY would the Citizens of any Semi-Democratic Country Allow its Corporately Lobbied Government to Sign Treaties/'Arrangements' & its Gov't. Encourages Corporations to Punitively Punish the 'harmless' Citizens via Secret Tribunals?

TRUMP'S CORPORATE USA PROTECTS TAXPAYERS from MASSIVE TREATY/'ARRANGEMENTS' LITIGATION COSTS & PENALTIES;
WHO'S NEXT TO EXIT?
***
FULL Article, see,
36) 'The BASIS for TREATIES/'ARRANGEMENTS' LITIGATION as an INVESTMENT';
davidehsmith.wordpress.com
***
Also see; 4) 'INSIDER TRADING' (Need for Secrecy), davidehsmith.wordpress.com
&
13) 'CSIS; The THREAT ASSESSMENT', see,
davidehsmith.wordpress.com
& 2) 'The MERKEL Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued', davidehsmith.wordpress.com
******
Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 members of your family, friends, associates in order that they can use the due diligence info to make more informed decision about their families financial planning, & then they can share it with 10 others

Posted by David Smith 1 on 08/08/2017 at 1:42 PM

Re: “TPP: Corporate takeover

Corporate Sovereignty, the TPP & Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’.

Historically, Corporate Canada has been protected & promoted by its relationship with the traditional media & its political interference via the leadership of the R.C.M.Police. The most egregious & undeniable ’crimes’ have been diluted with a sacrificial politician falling upon the sword with the retractable blade &then, arising from the ashes as an unnoticeable lobbyist, &/or, party executive.

On the other, the U.S. media has traditionally taken the role as the political cleansers for hire of Washington politics , until President Nixon. In the Post Watergate era the U.S. media has been conglomerated & homogenized in a similar fashion to the Canadian model, trading protection under the arrangements of the global corporate umbrella.

As 2 U.S. Senators have recently admitted that they have read the TPP, it leads one to ask; Why are other Members of Congress not coming forward with their admissions & therefore, the skeptical, post Nixon voters are also wondering how many Members have actually read the TPP & the other Global (non BRICS) Treaties/’Arrangements’?
And, should the Members of Congress & Members of Parliament Have to Sully Their ‘Beliefs’ & Sales Pitches with ‘Sordid’ Facts that Come from Actually Reading & Understanding Global Treaties/’Arrangements’?

***
At the risk of repeating the position, the crux of the flurry of Global Treaties is to shift the costs of corporations suing each other to suing the signatory governments; meaning, to suing the harmless Non Shareholders in order to inflate ‘profits & dividends’ of the corporations for their corporate leaders & Shareholders.

And, because the ‘disputes’ are to be resolved in secret (‘Death-Star’-Chamber) Tribunals there is no way to check & manage how much that the alleged ‘adversarial’ corporations are colluding to split any proceeds of the decisions; ie. any penalties, &/or, ‘damages’, particularly if the companies in the suits are owned jointly 49% - 51% (or, by any other split).

Other Tribunal abuses are;

1) Burden of proof; as the Tribunals are secret the litigants are not bound to government regulations & are not accountable to any governments, ie. the harmless, individual taxpayers who will pay the costs of:
a) developing, operating & maintaining the Tribunals
and
b) all of the decisions regardless of which corporations wins, or, loses the disputes, ie. The harmless, individual taxpayer is guilty in every decision at the outset of the resolution,

2) Appeals; there are no circumstances whereby the harmless taxpayers can take evidence that one, or, both of the corporations in a ‘dispute’ have acted ‘illegally’. For instance; the Tribunals do not have to accept proof that either, or, both of the litigants have inflated costs of the damages because neither ‘litigant’ is paying any of the costs. Consequently, the challenge of malfeasance will not be raised by the litigants. The proof of inflated costs will not be heard, or, have merit with The Tribunals. Will it be up to the harmless individual taxpayer to raise the legal funds in order to try to sue the corporations in the lesser courts including The Supreme Court of Canada, et al?
(see; Investment Litigation; Putin, Buffett, &/or, the ‘coveted’ Hong Kong investor)

3) Bribery/Lobbying; as the harmless taxpayers pays for all of the Global (non BRICS) Corporate Tribunals decisions, there will be no need for the corporate litigants to try & bribe the Tribunals as the ‘guilty’ party, the harmless taxpayers, have already been ascertained at the point that the Treaties/’Arrangements’ have been signed & ratified. It may not be a coincidence that as of May 20, 2015, 2 Republican Senators (US) have admitted that they Have read the TPP. How many Senators who have Not read it are Supporting the TPP? And, how many Canadian Senators, et al, Have read it, &/or, the other Global Corporate Treaties/’Agreements’ & as a consequence support the TPP, et al? (see; ; 'IGNORAMUS et IGNORABIMUS' (I do not know & I will Not Know),
4) Insider Trading, see; ‘SECRET TPPartnership, C-CITreaty, CETA TRIBUNALS are INSIDER TRADING’,
(davidehsmith.wordpress.com)

&

5) et al.

Therefore, one of the many areas of ‘collateral damage’ caused by the Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’ is tort law. As the corporations behind the treaties will no longer have to pay compensations because they are off-loading their liabilities to the signatory governments’ harmless taxpayers , the corporate ‘desire’ for tort ‘reform’ is moot. The Treaties are willfully causing the de facto ‘abolishment’ of significant areas of tort law.
By way of closing, what do you, the reader, think are some of the various other areas of ‘collateral damage’ that are probably the real target reasons for developing the treaties in the first place? Trade & employment are continuing to have nothing (or, very little) to do with why the corporations based in various countries have come together to protect &promote themselves at the costs of the harmless taxpayers via the flurry of Global Corporate Treaties/’Arrangements’. ***
For More Information, see,
'TPP & Global Treaties & Anti AIIB'. (davidehsmith.wordpress.com)

Also see;
'The Submission' to The SUPREME COURT of CANADA:
"The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of AMERICA, Australia, Canada, the EU, et al
vs
the harmless Canadian NON shareholders, both; Native & non Native, et al"
including
'The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued?'
(see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com)

Posted by David Smith 1 on 05/28/2015 at 6:48 PM

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation