Deja vu re Trump 

For a couple of million Arkansawyers, this fabulous circus of Russians, Trump, Mueller and Stormy is approaching deja vu.

The president, who had already lawyered up like no president and few potential criminal defendants in history, added a former independent counsel to his ever-changing legal team this week, prefiguring the great constitutional crisis that everyone knows is coming.

Real Arkansawyers have been there, or close enough. They, through their homegrown son, were in the eye of one of the half-dozen constitutional crises in American history when the country had to decide whether a president could or should be removed from office for having a sexual dalliance with a White House employee and then prevaricating about it both publicly and under oath.

The salacious stuff came after a five-year investigation of Bill and Hillary Clinton's involvement in a money-losing real-estate investment in 1978 on the White River that was pursued by two successive Republican independent counsels. More than a dozen Arkansawyers were charged with some violation of the law in the long investigation, although most had nothing to do with the Clintons. After the Clintons left the White House, the final Whitewater counsel acknowledged that in the investigation's eight years they had found no illegalities by the Clintons in the land deal or any of the dozen or so other matters except the president's prevarications about sex, which were the basis of impeachment articles for perjury and obstruction of justice.

All of this tiresome history is only prologue for the Trump ordeal, which follows generally the same matrix as Whitewater: an investigation with political overtones into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election run by an independent counsel appointed by the Justice Department that veered into ancillary matters — fraudulent deeds by the president's men who associated with the Russians and now, perhaps, by the president himself. And then, maybe, sex.

Clinton's and Trump's ordeal differ so far in two ways: the length of the inquiries and the presidents' handling of them. Robert Mueller's Russia investigation approaches a year. The investigations by Robert Fiske and Kenneth Starr into the old land deal and the suicide of the Clintons' friend and White House lawyer, Vince Foster, had lasted more than four years when Starr found sex. In 1998, Starr and his men, including the FBI, were lying doggo, waiting for something to do, when Linda Tripp exposed her friend Monica Lewinsky, who boasted about having oral sex with the president. Starr beseeched Clinton's attorney general, Janet Reno, to let him expand his probe to White House sex and she agreed. Sex with an employee was not illegal, but Clinton might be induced to commit a crime by lying about it to FBI agents, a grand jury or a court and thus set himself up for a perjury charge or obstruction of justice. He bit.

That is the mortal danger that Trump's lawyers are trying to forestall. Knowing Trump's propensity to lie about even the most trivial matters, they are trying to strike a deal with Mueller to sharply limit the matters they will ask Trump about when he is under oath — obviously, nothing about Trump finances or taxes or, to be perfectly safe, sex.

By word and deed, Trump already has far exceeded the threshold for obstruction of justice established in the Clinton impeachment. His firing of the FBI director and attacks on Mueller, his staff, his own Justice Department appointees, his appointed FBI director and the FBI itself, all to halt or limit the Russian investigation, go well beyond Clinton's quibbling about sex.

Trump last week said the investigation was invalid because Democrats were involved. Everyone who has run or overseen the investigation — Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Mueller, James Comey, the recently fired Andrew McCabe and Trump's FBI director Christopher Wray — are Republicans. The two men who ran the Whitewater investigation were Republicans as were their staffs (one of Starr's assistants claimed to have voted for Democrats) as were five of the six other independent counsels Reno appointed to run investigations of administration controversies. Clinton complained about the breadth and length of the investigations but not much about their partisan taint.

What if Mueller is another Starr and wades into the Stormy Daniels affair? Would he need to seek Rosenstein's permission, and would it be given? The grounds are far more serious. As Deep Throat said, follow the money.

The porn actress, who claims to have had sex with Trump often in 2006 and 2007, has been paid $130,000 by the Trump lawyer who handles his amorous affairs not to talk about the trysts that Trump says didn't happen. To launder the bribe, Trump's lawyer set up a Delaware company and created false names for Trump and Stormy and now threatens her with $20 million of damage claims if she talks.

Fraud, perjury, obstruction of justice? Mueller may be too loyal a Republican to follow Starr's precedent or Rosenstein and Sessions to let him. But someone else?



Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • Shrugging off sulfides

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported a shocker on its front page Sunday. The rotten-egg odor from the Koch brothers' sprawling paper plant at Crossett is still making people sick, but the state's pollution control agency is unaware of the problem.
    • Mar 29, 2018

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • ACA will stand

    If you are worried about your health care — and that ought to be nearly everyone — pay no attention to the triumphant tweet of President Trump last Friday or the hurrah the same day from Leslie Rutledge, the Arkansas attorney general, after the most political judge in America declared the whole Affordable Care Act null and void.
    • Dec 20, 2018
  • Sex and Trump

    No one, least of all Donald Trump, should be surprised when sex puts him in mortal jeopardy, which seemed to be the case last week when his personal lawyer pleaded guilty to violating the law by arranging $280,000 in hush payments to a porn actress and a Playboy model who were prepared to tell voters about having sex with him.
    • Dec 13, 2018
  • A decent man

    The beatification of George H.W. Bush, which even the current president signaled was OK, would have surprised the 41st president, who seemed to have accepted the public's verdict that, although a waffler, he was a decent man who did his best and didn't do any harm to the people of the country or the world with whose well-being he was entrusted for a time.
    • Dec 6, 2018
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • Buying way into the Ivies: What else is new?

    If it’s news to you that social climbers see buying their children’s way into fancy, name-brand colleges as the functional equivalent of wearing Rolex watches or driving Maseratis, then I don’t know where to start.

© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation