Favorite

Dishonor before political death 

President Bush stands in an unenviable position, in fact just about where four other postwar presidents who were seeking another term stood in the last days before the election. Three were defeated. Most Americans do not believe Bush deserves to be president any longer, if that is a fair interpretation of poor approval ratings. One poll this week gave him a cumulative job approval rating of 47 percent, though he polls a little higher in some areas, such as the war on terrorism, and much lower in others, mainly dealing with economic problems. George H. W. Bush, Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford could not survive the failure of confidence. Only Harry Truman in 1948 did, in the biggest political upset of the century. Down in the Gallup Poll and his party splintered by liberal and conservative factions that put their own candidates on the ballot, Truman fought back. He barnstormed the country, largely ignoring his Republican opponent, Gov. Tom Dewey, but attacking the “do nothing” Republican Congress. Bush I, Carter and Ford lost but you would have to say that they lost with a fair degree of honor. They ran out the string until election day complimenting their own records, promising even better times and taking a few digs at their opponent’s records in public life. Bush Junior is following the Truman model, or at least adopting his determination. But Truman’s tough language never blurred the facts. He never engaged in massive distortions about what Dewey had done or said or, for that matter, what the Republican Congress had done. No presidential campaign of modern times, not even Richard Nixon’s dirty-tricks campaign of 1972, has resorted to the level of mischief that has marked the campaign of Bush and Vice President Cheney. Lee Atwater introduced the doctrine that winning is so important that it justifies whatever needs to be done to produce the result. The Bush-Cheney campaign is the culmination of that idea. Karl Rove deserves credit for figuring out the only way Bush could win when most of the country had lost confidence in his leadership. The president’s single strength was the impression that he was a firm and decisive commander in chief, even if he was wrong in his decisions about the war and even if he had run the economy into the ground. The opponent would need to be so wishy-washy and cowardly that people worried about how he would confront the adversities that Bush and Cheney said were sure to come at the hands of terrorists. If Wes Clark or anyone else had won the Democratic nomination, the strategy would be the same. It required not only the repetition of the words like wishy-washy but distorting the voting records and old speeches and twisting small phrases into meanings the precise opposite of what Kerry had said, all to the end of portraying the Democrat as a weak man who vacillated at every obstacle. In Cheney’s case, it involved stackable lies about the records of Kerry and Sen. John Edwards. It began with convincing falsehoods about Kerry’s votes on the war resolution and on his votes on weapons and the $87 billion supplemental war appropriation in 2003. They said he voted to go to war but against money to support the troops. Of course, he did vote for the $67 billion to support troops and $20 billion in loans for reconstructing Iraq, but Bush threatened to veto the version Kerry supported — a version, by the way, that a vast majority of Americans would have preferred — and Republicans fell into line and voted out the Bush plan, which was far costlier to the American taxpayer. In the last three weeks, Bush and Cheney came up almost daily with a fresh distortion of Kerry’s words, plucking out a half-dozen words from a lengthy dissertation on security to suggest that Kerry would not stand up to terrorists, exactly opposite of what he had said. The media has acted occasionally as a truth squad but the corrections of the record are always buried and neutered by the impulse to demonstrate balance by finding an equal number of problems with the other side when the errors were of entirely different magnitudes. The Washington Post in late August ran a long and illuminating list of Kerry quotes alongside the twisted versions by Bush and Cheney, but they came so fast afterward that it was pointless to try to keep up. When this race is over, the country needs a serious debate about whether the Atwater doctrine serves the democracy. It is a problem at least as serious as campaign money. Some have suggested a truth-in-elections commission to sort out and call attention to lies and distortions, which at least one state employs. Though it might act as some restraint, the simple tide of untruths in this campaign makes that instantly impractical. Bush told a fawning Fox News interviewer Monday that he knew for an absolute dead certainty that he would be re-elected. A man who says that is not going to be deterred by a truth commission.
Favorite

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Inhuman America

    Our history has included some evil passages — slavery and white supremacy, the forced removal of Native Americans from their homes, the imprisonment and dispossession of Japanese Americans during World War II, the torture of prisoners in latter-day wars — but it is also a part of our history that we came to officially regard them all with shame, as offenses to the human rights that were our original values.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Legislative boodlers

    Which sounds like the best use of your taxpayer dollars: helping pay for medical care for unemployed people, or bribing and lobbying legislators and other government officials to bestow millions of your tax dollars on a corrupt organization that claims it helps poor people who have drug problems or disabilities?
    • Jun 14, 2018
  • Scary Granny Pelosi

    Nancy Pelosi has replaced Barack Obama as the all-purpose bete noir of Republican politicians, including Arkansas's, but will she be as potent as the black president?
    • Jun 7, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • Shrugging off sulfides

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported a shocker on its front page Sunday. The rotten-egg odor from the Koch brothers' sprawling paper plant at Crossett is still making people sick, but the state's pollution control agency is unaware of the problem.
    • Mar 29, 2018

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Inhuman America

    Our history has included some evil passages — slavery and white supremacy, the forced removal of Native Americans from their homes, the imprisonment and dispossession of Japanese Americans during World War II, the torture of prisoners in latter-day wars — but it is also a part of our history that we came to officially regard them all with shame, as offenses to the human rights that were our original values.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Legislative boodlers

    Which sounds like the best use of your taxpayer dollars: helping pay for medical care for unemployed people, or bribing and lobbying legislators and other government officials to bestow millions of your tax dollars on a corrupt organization that claims it helps poor people who have drug problems or disabilities?
    • Jun 14, 2018
  • Scary Granny Pelosi

    Nancy Pelosi has replaced Barack Obama as the all-purpose bete noir of Republican politicians, including Arkansas's, but will she be as potent as the black president?
    • Jun 7, 2018
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • The battle over Issue 1

    The odds are that the most spending in a statewide campaign in Arkansas this year will not be for a constitutional office, but instead in a battle over a proposed state constitutional amendment.
  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
  • The cult of Trump

    Nearly 40 years ago our country was introduced to two major phenomena centering around cults: namely, the Moonies and the Shiite Muslims. There were others, as well, and I soon became fascinated with the dynamics of cults and cult leaders (both religious and secular) in general — leading me to read a number of books and articles, some even written by those who had been deprogrammed after spending time in a cult.
  • Trump doctrine

    Let's face it: President Trump enjoys hurting and humiliating people, and that's the thing some of his loudest supporters like about him. Making women and children cry makes him feel manly and powerful. The more defenseless, the better. He particularly enjoys punishing racial minorities.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Him, again

    • That's why it is better to bag babes at the bigger libraries. You get a…

    • on June 20, 2018
  • Re: Legislative boodlers

    • The U6 unemployment rate is still at 8%, partly because they can get benefits and…

    • on June 19, 2018
  • Re: Him, again

    • Regardless of my success or lack of it, I've been way ahead of Trump all…

    • on June 19, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation