Double indemnity 

I can sympathize with state legislators who are opposing the substantial increases in school funding that have been proposed for the coming special session.

Not because I think we shouldn’t invest heavily in education. Any amount of money we can direct toward the public school system is badly needed, and it’s hard to imagine how we could overspend in that area, considering where Arkansas stands in quality measurements relative to other states.

But where would the money ultimately go? We already know that some school districts allocate more than a reasonable share of their budgets to athletic and administrative expenses while failing to provide a decent basic education. Even where schools are being responsible with their money, however, it’s rare to see a direct, immediate correlation between increased financial support and improved academic performance.

The reason, most likely, is that we are merely propping up an outdated system. We need to continue to prop it up — at least in the short term — because the alternative would be unacceptable backsliding. But we also need to seriously consider wholesale reform of the public school curriculum.

It’s a curriculum that has worked fine for the kinds of manufacturing and agricultural jobs that have been common in Arkansas for decades. But those jobs are beginning to leave, as industries reorganize, downsize or export them to other nations where wages are lower. Now the jobs that remain in the U.S. — especially in the manufacturing and agricultural sectors — require a higher degree of education, because that is our only competitive advantage in the global marketplace. So the high school diploma needs to mean more than it did before.

In many ways, what children learn in school and how they learn it has not fundamentally changed in half a century. Just as our health care system was designed for a different era, our approach to public education does not take into account the world we live in today. Both institutions have served us well until now, and we have become comfortable with them, so it is difficult to even imagine restructuring them. But that burden is falling upon us now, and we need to seize the initiative or risk falling further behind.

A solution may come with the realization that the connection between health care and education is more than theoretical. As the percentage of medically uninsured Americans grows, states are devoting ever-larger portions of their budgets to programs like Medicaid. In fiscal 2004, Arkansas allocated 21 percent of its general revenues to health and human services.

It’s absurd that states should have to spend so much on health care when the federal government is already so heavily invested. And the problem will only get worse — consuming even more of Arkansas’s budget — as the Baby Boom generation ages and makes unprecedented demands on the system.

On the other hand, education is to state government what national defense is to the federal government: It is its number-one priority and the service it is uniquely equipped to deliver. With this in mind, the money Arkansas is spending on health care — one-fifth of its taxes — would be better directed toward innovative, incremental reforms to its public school system.

The way to achieve this is through the creation of a simple health insurance plan provided by the federal government. It’s efficient and rational, because it diffuses risk and eliminates many systemic complications. It’s fairer to business, which is shouldering more costs as competitive pressures make that harder to do. And it’s practically a moral obligation as more Americans lose insurance, forcing them to forgo care while driving up health care rates for everyone.

The first step, of course, is acknowledging the need for a complete overhaul of the education and health care systems. In both areas, we’re wasting money each year by spending more for less. Over the last 10 years, our economy and society have changed drastically, but we keep doing things the same way.

At a time when education has never been more important to the future of our state, we should find ways to erase any doubt that it deserves a greater investment. A recommitment to public schools demands rethinking and reform, and that will only be possible after we remove the shackles of our inefficient and unsustainable health care system.


Sign up for the Daily Update email


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Rutledge opponent hits her socializing with corporate interests

    Mike Lee, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, has criticized Attorney General Leslie Rutledge over recent reports of her participation at private meetings where corporate interests make big contributions to a political group she heads for access to state legal officers.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • More »

More by Warwick Sabin

  • Helena's disappearing buildings

    Preservationists hope to slow demolitions.
    • Mar 22, 2007
  • Trailers headed to Dumas

    Gov. Mike Beebe issued the following statement earlier today: Although this decision by FEMA to deny emergency funds to Desha County defies common sense, Arkansas will take care of its own people.
    • Mar 9, 2007
  • Youth Ranch robbed, vandalized

    According to a press release we just received: The Donald W. Reynolds Campus of the Arkansas Sheriff’s Youth Ranches (The Ranch) located near Fort Smith was vandalized overnight Thursday.  Items stolen during the break-in included all of the children’s saddles, food, tools and supplies from The Ranch’s carpentry shop and all equipment from its auto shop.  An investigation is underway with the Crawford County Sheriff’s Office.
    • Mar 9, 2007
  • More »

Latest in Warwick Sabin

  • Trickle-up theory

    Through thick and thin, there has always been one group of dedicated Americans whose support for President George W. Bush has been unwavering: The wealthy.
    • Mar 8, 2007
  • Time to go

    Tough questions face us in Iraq and it's time to confront them directly.
    • Mar 1, 2007
  • Plugged in

    One reason why the South remained solidly Democratic during the mid-20th century was the enduring gratitude to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who brought electricity to the poor, rural parts of the region. According to one historical account, ÔÇťAlthou
    • Feb 22, 2007
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: The cult of Trump

    • That isn't what I said, and you know that pretty well, Oaf. Just lies and…

    • on June 23, 2018
  • Re: The cult of Trump

    • Rabbi, you probably don't know Steven. He's the head Kool-Aid taster for the Trump cult…

    • on June 22, 2018
  • Re: The cult of Trump

    • Those traits sound like most any politician in DC, mostly the Dims.

    • on June 22, 2018

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation